Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Info widget flicking on wayland #128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rb-union
Copy link
Contributor

@rb-union rb-union commented Feb 6, 2024

Wayland 下默认动画和应用动画重叠,同时可能导致
wayland 未正确取得控件信息,显示花屏,调整应用
动画在 wayland 动画后.

  • 尝试首次展示降低动画时间,或展示后show()刷新 效果不佳,控件重叠

Log: Info widget flicking on wayland
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-242125.html

Wayland 下默认动画和应用动画重叠,同时可能导致
wayland 未正确取得控件信息,显示花屏,调整应用
动画在 wayland 动画后.
* 尝试首次展示降低动画时间,或展示后show()刷新
  效果不佳,控件重叠

Log: Info widget flicking on wayland
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-242125.html
Copy link
Contributor

@starhcq starhcq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/+1

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rb-union, starhcq

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rb-union rb-union merged commit 8d154df into linuxdeepin:master Feb 6, 2024
17 checks passed
rb-union added a commit to rb-union/image-editor that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
Bump version to 1.0.43
PR:
* linuxdeepin#128

Log: Bump version to 1.0.43
starhcq pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
Bump version to 1.0.43
PR:
* #128

Log: Bump version to 1.0.43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants