Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: change the AIO disk block size to 512 bytes for v2 data engine #3403

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

derekbit
Copy link
Member

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#10053

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@derekbit derekbit self-assigned this Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the defaultBlockSize constant in the controller/monitor/disk_utils.go file, changing its value from 4096 to 512 bytes. This change is specifically targeted at improving compatibility with the v2 data engine's disk operations, aligning the block size with the configuration used in the v1 data engine. The modification affects how disk configurations are generated for block-type disks, potentially impacting disk-related operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
controller/monitor/disk_utils.go Updated defaultBlockSize constant from 4096 to 512

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Change AIO disk block size to 512 bytes [#10053]
Improve compatibility with v1 data engine disk configurations

The changes directly address the improvement request by modifying the default block size to 512 bytes, which should resolve the compatibility issues with backing images generated by the v1 data engine.

Note: Users are still advised to follow the migration steps outlined in the issue description when updating existing v2 volumes.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74c9544 and 3e20ca5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • controller/monitor/disk_utils.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
controller/monitor/disk_utils.go (1)

24-24: Confirm the rationale for reducing the default block size to 512 bytes.

While this change may be necessary for the v2 data engine’s AIO use-case, please verify that this reduction doesn’t introduce unintended performance or alignment issues for other parts of the system relying on the original 4096 bytes.

Below is a script to locate all references to the defaultBlockSize usage and highlight references to confirm the updated block size is intended for the v2 data engine only:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the block size usage and its implications.


Let me search for more context about the block size usage and its relationship with the v2 data engine.


Let me search for more specific information about the block size change and its relationship with disk drivers.


Let me check the disk service client implementation to understand how the block size is used.


Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response about the block size change:

The block size reduction to 512 bytes is appropriate and intentional.

The block size of 512 bytes is used specifically for block-type disk configurations when creating disk devices through the disk service client. This aligns with:

  1. The standard Linux block device sector size of 512 bytes, as seen in the longhorn-engine package (vendor/github.com/longhorn/longhorn-engine/pkg/util/util.go:BlockSizeLinux = 512)
  2. The AIO disk driver implementation, which is the default disk driver for block devices (DiskDriverAio)
  3. The disk service's block device creation process that uses this block size for proper device initialization

The change from 4096 to 512 bytes ensures better compatibility with the underlying block device layer and the AIO disk driver, while maintaining proper sector alignment. This is not a performance concern as modern storage stacks handle 512-byte sectors efficiently.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all references to defaultBlockSize throughout the codebase, providing extra 5 lines of context.

rg -A 5 "defaultBlockSize"

Length of output: 880


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for block size related constants and configurations
rg -i "block.*size.*=.*4096|block.*size.*512" -A 3

# Search for AIO related code and configurations
rg -i "aio|async.*io" -A 3

# Look for disk configuration and initialization code
ast-grep --pattern 'func generateBlockTypeDiskConfig($$$)'

Length of output: 62860


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for block size related code and configurations in the v2 data engine
rg -i "v2.*data.*engine.*block.*size|block.*size.*v2" -A 3

# Search for any documentation or comments about block size
rg -i "block.*size" -g "*.md" -A 3

# Look for disk configuration related code
ast-grep --pattern 'type DiskConfig struct {$$$}'

Length of output: 6409


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the history of defaultBlockSize changes
git log -p --all -S "defaultBlockSize"

# Search for disk driver related code and configurations
rg -i "diskdriver.*aio|aio.*disk" -A 3

# Look for block device related configurations
rg -i "block.*device.*config|device.*block.*size" -A 3

Length of output: 1379


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for disk service client implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'type DiskServiceClient struct {$$$}'

# Search for disk creation and block size usage
rg -i "diskcreate.*block.*size|block.*type.*disk" -A 5

# Search for any comments or documentation about block size configuration
rg -i "block.*size.*config|block.*device.*config" -A 5 -g "*.go"

Length of output: 9425


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@derekbit
Copy link
Member Author

@mergify backport v1.8.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 24, 2024

backport v1.8.x

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

@ChanYiLin ChanYiLin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants