-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Development
: Migrate the git diff report module to standalone components
#9443
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range comments (14)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-14
: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation of reactive patterns and new Angular syntax.The changes in this file successfully achieve the following:
- Migrated from property access to method calls, consistent with the use of signals or computed properties.
- Implemented the new
@if
syntax as per the coding guidelines.- Ensured reactivity in all dynamic parts of the template.
These modifications align well with the PR objectives and coding guidelines. The code is now more reactive and follows modern Angular practices.
To further improve the component:
- Consider extracting complex logic (like ngClass conditions) into computed properties or methods in the component class.
- Ensure that the corresponding TypeScript file (
git-diff-file-panel-title.component.ts
) has been updated to use signals or computed properties fortitle
andfileStatus
.- If not already done, consider adding unit tests to verify the reactive behavior of this component.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html (2)
Line range hint
28-34
: Good use of @if. Consider method call for consistency.The replacement of
*ngIf
with@if
for displaying the error message is correct and follows the new Angular syntax guidelines.For consistency with other changes in this file, consider changing the condition to a method call:
@if (errorWhileFetchingRepos()) {This would align with the pattern used elsewhere in the template and ensure that the latest value is always used.
Line range hint
1-38
: Overall structure looks good. Consider full consistency in method calls.The overall structure of the modal template is well-maintained, with appropriate sections for the header and body. The changes made improve reactivity and align with new Angular syntax guidelines.
For full consistency, consider converting all property bindings to method calls throughout the template. For example:
<button type="button" class="btn-close" aria-label="Close" (click)="close()"></button>Could be changed to:
<button type="button" class="btn-close" aria-label="Close" (click)="close()"></button>This would ensure a uniform approach across the entire template.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/participate/programming-repository.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-48
: Enhance module organization for better readabilityWhile the file generally adheres to coding guidelines, consider the following improvements:
- Group related imports together (e.g., all Artemis-specific modules, then Angular modules).
- Consider using a barrel file for Artemis modules to reduce import lines.
- Sort imports alphabetically within each group.
These changes will enhance readability and maintainability.
Here's an example of how you could reorganize the imports:
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { FormsModule } from '@angular/forms'; import { ArtemisAssessmentSharedModule, ArtemisProgrammingExerciseModule, ArtemisProgrammingRepositoryRoutingModule, // ... other Artemis modules } from 'app/exercises'; import { FeatureToggleModule } from 'app/shared/feature-toggle/feature-toggle.module'; import { FormDateTimePickerModule } from 'app/shared/date-time-picker/date-time-picker.module'; import { CommitDetailsViewComponent } from 'app/localvc/commit-details-view/commit-details-view.component'; import { CommitHistoryComponent } from 'app/localvc/commit-history/commit-history.component'; import { GitDiffReportComponent } from 'app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component'; import { RepositoryViewComponent } from 'app/localvc/repository-view/repository-view.component'; // ... rest of the filesrc/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
59-133
: LGTM: Consistent updates across all test cases, but consider parameterization.The changes across all remaining test cases are consistent and appropriate:
- Proper use of
setInput
fordiffEntries
anddetectChanges()
.- Correct updating of expectations to use method calls.
- Good coverage of various scenarios for added and removed lines.
These changes improve the tests' accuracy and maintainability.
However, to further enhance the test suite:
Consider parameterizing these tests to reduce repetition and improve maintainability. You could use Jest's
test.each
or a similar approach. For example:const testCases = [ { input: [{ filePath: 'src/a.java', startLine: 1, lineCount: 1 }], expected: { added: 1, removed: 0 } }, // ... other test cases ... ]; test.each(testCases)('Should set added/removed lines correctly', ({ input, expected }) => { fixture.componentRef.setInput('diffEntries', input as ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffEntry[]); fixture.detectChanges(); expect(comp.addedLineCount()).toBe(expected.added); expect(comp.removedLineCount()).toBe(expected.removed); });This approach would make it easier to add new test cases and maintain the existing ones.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.ts (5)
Line range hint
16-30
: Approved changes with a minor suggestion for consistency.The modifications to the class declaration and properties are in line with the PR objectives:
- Removal of
ngOnInit
andresizeObserver
, simplifying the component's lifecycle management.- Introduction of
input()
andoutput()
for reactive state management using signals.The property naming follows the camelCase convention as required by the coding guidelines.
For consistency with other properties, consider adding an underscore prefix to the private
_editor
property:- private _editor: monaco.editor.IStandaloneDiffEditor; + private readonly _editor: monaco.editor.IStandaloneDiffEditor;This change would align with the readonly nature of other injected services and improve consistency within the class.
Line range hint
32-62
: Approved changes with a suggestion for code organization.The modifications to the constructor and
ngOnDestroy
method are well-implemented:
- Moving editor creation to the constructor ensures immediate availability, preventing potential errors.
- The use of
effect()
for reactive updates of editor options based onallowSplitView
aligns with the signal-based approach outlined in the PR objectives.- The destruction logic in
ngOnDestroy
remains appropriate for proper resource cleanup.Consider extracting the editor creation logic into a separate private method for improved readability:
private createAndAppendEditor(): void { this.monacoDiffEditorContainerElement = this.renderer.createElement('div'); this._editor = this.monacoEditorService.createStandaloneDiffEditor(this.monacoDiffEditorContainerElement); this.renderer.appendChild(this.elementRef.nativeElement, this.monacoDiffEditorContainerElement); this.renderer.addClass(this.monacoDiffEditorContainerElement, 'diff-editor-container'); }Then call this method in the constructor. This refactoring would improve code organization and make the constructor more concise.
Line range hint
64-96
: Approved changes with a suggestion for improved clarity.The modifications to
setupDiffListener
andsetupContentHeightListeners
methods are well-implemented:
- The change to use
adjustContainerHeight
aligns with the PR's goal of simplifying layout handling.- The listener setup logic remains robust, effectively handling various scenarios that might affect the editor's content height.
For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of using
getMaximumContentHeight()
in thesetupDiffListener
method:setupDiffListener(): void { const diffListener = this._editor.onDidUpdateDiff(() => { // Adjust container height based on the larger of the two editors to ensure proper display this.adjustContainerHeight(this.getMaximumContentHeight()); this.onReadyForDisplayChange.emit(true); }); this.listeners.push(diffListener); }This comment would help future developers understand the reasoning behind using the maximum content height.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 104-104: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
Line range hint
107-140
: Approved with a suggestion for improved error handling.The
setFileContents
method remains well-implemented:
- It correctly signals that the component is not ready for display while updating content.
- The logic for setting up and updating editor models is sound and unchanged.
Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
setFileContents(original?: string, originalFileName?: string, modified?: string, modifiedFileName?: string): void { try { this.onReadyForDisplayChange.emit(false); // ... existing code ... } catch (error) { console.error('Error setting file contents:', error); // Optionally, emit a different signal or handle the error as needed } finally { // Ensure we always signal that the operation is complete, even if an error occurred this.onReadyForDisplayChange.emit(true); } }This change would make the method more resilient to potential errors during file content updates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 104-104: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
Line range hint
142-163
: Approved with a suggestion for improved type safety.The utility methods
getMaximumContentHeight
,getContentHeightOfEditor
, andgetText
are well-implemented:
- They are concise and focused, each serving a specific purpose.
- The naming follows the camelCase convention as per the coding guidelines.
- These methods effectively support the overall functionality of the component.
For improved type safety, consider adding a return type annotation to the
getText
method:getText(): MonacoEditorDiffText { const original = this._editor.getOriginalEditor().getValue(); const modified = this._editor.getModifiedEditor().getValue(); return { original, modified }; }This change would make the method's return type explicit, improving code readability and type checking.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-216
: Excellent improvements to the GitDiffReportComponent test suiteThe changes made to this test file significantly enhance its quality and reliability:
- Consistent use of
fixture.componentRef.setInput()
for setting component inputs.- Proper triggering of change detection with
fixture.detectChanges()
.- Use of method calls in assertions instead of direct property access.
- Addition of new test cases to improve coverage, particularly for diff readiness and renamed file identification.
- Clear and consistent test structure following the arrange-act-assert pattern.
These improvements align well with Angular testing best practices and our coding guidelines.
For future enhancements, consider:
- Adding more edge cases to test boundary conditions.
- Exploring the use of parameterized tests for similar test cases with different inputs.
- Adding performance tests if there are any performance-critical operations in the component.
Overall, excellent work on improving this test suite!
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-modal.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-169
: Overall, excellent improvements to the test suite with minor suggestions for further enhancement.The changes made to this test file significantly improve its robustness and coverage. Key improvements include:
- Introduction of the
finishEffects
function for better async handling.- Use of
fixture.componentRef.setInput
for more accurate input setting.- Additional test cases covering various scenarios, including error handling and cache usage.
- Consistent use of method calls in expectations, reflecting possible API changes in the component.
These changes align well with Angular testing best practices and the PR objectives of ensuring thorough testing and maintaining a responsive UI.
To further enhance the test suite, consider the following suggestions:
- Replace the custom
finishEffects
function with Angular'sfakeAsync
andtick
utilities for more idiomatic async handling.- Refactor the error handling test into separate
it
blocks for better isolation of test cases.- Update the component's documentation if the API has indeed changed to use methods instead of properties.
These minor adjustments would make the test suite even more robust and maintainable.
src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/exam-management.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-160
: Consider further modularization in the futureWhile the current changes are appropriate and align with the PR objectives, I noticed that this module has a large number of imports and declarations. In the future, consider breaking this module down into smaller, more focused modules to improve maintainability and reduce the cognitive load when working with this file.
This suggestion is based on the Angular style guide principle of keeping modules focused and cohesive. It's not an immediate issue but something to keep in mind for future refactoring efforts.
src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/student-exams/student-exam-timeline/programming-exam-diff/programming-exercise-exam-diff.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
131-133
: Manage the subscription to prevent potential memory leaks.The subscription within
showGitDiff()
togetCachedRepositoryFilesObservable()
is not being managed. IfshowGitDiff()
is called multiple times, this could lead to multiple active subscriptions and potential memory leaks.Consider storing the subscription and unsubscribing in
ngOnDestroy()
:+ private cachedFilesSubscription?: Subscription; showGitDiff(): void { const modalRef = this.modalService.open(GitDiffReportModalComponent, { windowClass: GitDiffReportModalComponent.WINDOW_CLASS }); modalRef.componentInstance.report = this.exercise.gitDiffReport; modalRef.componentInstance.diffForTemplateAndSolution = false; modalRef.componentInstance.cachedRepositoryFiles = this.cachedRepositoryFiles; - this.cachedRepositoryFilesService.getCachedRepositoryFilesObservable().subscribe((cachedRepositoryFiles) => { + this.cachedFilesSubscription = this.cachedRepositoryFilesService.getCachedRepositoryFilesObservable().subscribe((cachedRepositoryFiles) => { this.cachedRepositoryFiles = cachedRepositoryFiles; }); } ngOnDestroy(): void { this.exerciseIdSubscription?.unsubscribe(); + this.cachedFilesSubscription?.unsubscribe(); }Alternatively, use the
take(1)
operator if only a single emission is needed:this.cachedFilesSubscription = this.cachedRepositoryFilesService.getCachedRepositoryFilesObservable() + .pipe(take(1)) .subscribe((cachedRepositoryFiles) => { this.cachedRepositoryFiles = cachedRepositoryFiles; });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
- src/main/webapp/app/detail-overview-list/components/programming-diff-report-detail/programming-diff-report-detail.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/detail-overview-list/detail.module.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/exam-management.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/student-exams/student-exam-timeline/programming-exam-diff/programming-exercise-exam-diff.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.html (4 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.module.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/manage/programming-exercise-management.module.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/participate/programming-repository.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.ts (5 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-editor.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/exam/manage/programming-exam-diff.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-modal.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.spec.ts (8 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/main/webapp/app/detail-overview-list/detail.module.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.module.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/manage/programming-exercise-management.module.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (27)
src/main/webapp/app/detail-overview-list/components/programming-diff-report-detail/programming-diff-report-detail.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/exam-management.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/student-exams/student-exam-timeline/programming-exam-diff/programming-exercise-exam-diff.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/participate/programming-repository.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-editor.service.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/exam/manage/programming-exam-diff.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-modal.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🪛 Biome
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts
[error] 43-43: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 47-47: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 47-47: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 47-47: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 55-55: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 59-59: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 59-59: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 59-59: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
[error] 56-56: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 65-65: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 67-67: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 83-83: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 84-84: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 88-88: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 99-99: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 106-106: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 108-108: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 118-118: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 133-133: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 134-134: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 138-138: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 150-150: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 150-150: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
[error] 53-53: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 66-66: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 68-68: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 129-129: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (80)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.scss (2)
1-8
: LGTM: New CSS class improves editor appearanceThe introduction of the
.diff-editor-container
class with its nested selectors is a good approach to target the Monaco diff editor and its child editor. Settingoutline: none
effectively removes the focus border, which can improve the overall appearance of the editor.A few observations:
- The nesting structure is clean and follows SCSS best practices.
- The comment on line 4 clearly explains the purpose of the
outline: none
property.
Line range hint
11-21
: Existing styles for hidden lines retained appropriatelyThe styles for
.diff-hidden-lines .top
and.diff-hidden-lines .bottom
have been correctly retained. These styles hide the drag handles for hidden lines, preventing unintuitive behavior as explained in the comment.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.html (4)
2-2
: LGTM: Updated to use method call for reactive state.The change from property access to method call (
addedLineCount()
) aligns with the PR objectives of migrating to standalone components and introducing signals. This update enhances reactivity and is consistent with modern Angular practices.
3-3
: LGTM: Consistent update to use method call.The change to
removedLineCount()
is consistent with the previous update and aligns with the PR objectives. This maintains a uniform approach to accessing reactive state within the template.
5-10
: LGTM: Updated loop syntax and optimized rendering.The changes in this segment demonstrate several improvements:
- Use of
@for
instead of*ngFor
, adhering to the new Angular syntax as per the coding guidelines.- Transition to method calls (
addedSquareArray()
andremovedSquareArray()
), consistent with the reactive approach.- Addition of
track $index
, which is a best practice for optimizing Angular's change detection in loops.These updates align well with the PR objectives and contribute to a more efficient and reactive component.
Line range hint
1-13
: Overall assessment: Excellent updates aligned with PR objectives.The changes in this file consistently implement the migration to standalone components and the introduction of reactive patterns. The use of method calls instead of property access, along with the updated loop syntax, contributes to a more efficient and maintainable component. These modifications align perfectly with the PR objectives and adhere to the provided coding guidelines.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.html (1)
2-7
: LGTM! Correct usage of new Angular syntax.The change from
*ngIf
to@if
adheres to the new Angular syntax guidelines. The transition fromfileUnchanged
tofileUnchanged()
indicates a shift from a property to a method call, which is consistent with the migration to reactive state management.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.html (3)
2-2
: LGTM: Updated property access to method invocation.The change from
{{ title }}
to{{ title() }}
is correct and aligns with the migration to reactive state management using Angular's signals or computed properties.
3-3
: Excellent: Updated to new @if syntax and method invocation.The changes in this line are commendable:
- Replaced
*ngIf
with@if
, adhering to the new Angular syntax as per the coding guidelines.- Updated
fileStatus
tofileStatus()
, consistent with the shift to reactive state management.These modifications improve code consistency and reactivity.
5-5
: LGTM: Updated property access in translation string.The change from
fileStatus
tofileStatus()
in the translation string is correct and consistent with the migration to reactive state management.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html (1)
20-27
: Excellent use of @if for error handling.The replacement of
*ngIf
with@if
for error handling is spot on. It adheres to the new Angular syntax guidelines while maintaining the existing error handling logic.The error handling approach looks good, showing a loading spinner when there's no error and the content is still loading.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.spec.ts (3)
7-7
: LGTM: Improved test suite descriptionThe updated description in the describe block is more concise and aligns better with Angular naming conventions. This change enhances readability and consistency.
32-36
: Excellent improvements in test implementationThe changes in this test case significantly improve its alignment with Angular best practices:
- Using
fixture.componentRef.setInput()
is the correct way to set input values in Angular tests.- Calling
fixture.detectChanges()
ensures that the component's view is updated after input changes.- Using
comp.squareCounts()
to retrieve values suggests improved encapsulation in the component.These changes make the test more robust and maintainable while still covering the same functionality.
Additionally, the assertions follow the coding guidelines for expectation specificity, using
toBe
for reference equality checks.
Line range hint
1-38
: Overall assessment: Excellent improvementsThe changes in this test file demonstrate a strong understanding of Angular testing best practices. The updated implementation:
- Improves alignment with Angular's input binding and change detection mechanisms.
- Enhances test readability and maintainability.
- Adheres to the provided coding guidelines, particularly in terms of expectation specificity.
These modifications contribute to a more robust and reliable test suite for the GitDiffLineStatComponent.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.html (7)
4-4
: LGTM: Property bindings updated to use method calls.The changes in this line align well with the PR objectives of migrating to standalone components and utilizing signals. The use of method calls (
modifiedFilePath()
andoriginalFilePath()
) instead of direct property references indicates a shift towards a more reactive approach, which should improve the component's responsiveness to state changes.
7-8
: LGTM: Consistent update of property bindings to method calls.The changes in these lines follow the same pattern as the previous modifications, updating property bindings to use method calls (
addedLineCount()
andremovedLineCount()
) instead of direct property references. This consistency maintains the reactive approach throughout the component.
10-10
: LGTM: Updated tooltip to use method call for dynamic content.The change to use
diffForTemplateAndSolution()
in thengbTooltip
attribute is consistent with the overall approach of using method calls instead of direct property references. This modification allows for potentially dynamic tooltip content based on the current state of the component.
24-30
: LGTM: Comprehensive update of property bindings and addition of new bindings.The changes in these lines consistently update all property bindings to use method calls, aligning with the PR objectives and the overall pattern of changes in this file. The addition of
[originalFilePath]
and[modifiedFilePath]
bindings enhances the component's data flow or functionality. These modifications should improve the reactivity and modularity of the component.
Line range hint
1-36
: LGTM: Compliant with coding guidelines and Angular best practices.The changes in this file adhere to the provided coding guidelines. Although the guideline about using @if and @for over *ngIf and *ngFor is not directly applicable (as these directives are not present), the overall modifications align well with Angular best practices and the PR objectives of migrating to standalone components and utilizing signals.
Line range hint
1-36
: Great job on improving component reactivity!The changes made to this file consistently enhance the reactivity of the component by using method calls instead of direct property references. This approach aligns well with modern Angular practices and should improve the component's performance and maintainability. The modifications maintain the existing structure while introducing a more dynamic behavior, which is likely to result in a more responsive user interface.
Line range hint
1-36
: Excellent work on migrating to reactive patterns!This file demonstrates a successful migration towards more reactive patterns in Angular. The consistent use of method calls in property bindings aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of transitioning to standalone components and utilizing signals. These changes should result in improved performance, better maintainability, and a more responsive user interface. The modifications are well-executed and maintain the existing functionality while enhancing the component's reactivity. Great job on this part of the migration!
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.spec.ts (5)
25-26
: Improved input parameter namingThe renaming of
filePath
tomodifiedFilePath
andpreviousFilePath
tooriginalFilePath
enhances clarity and precision in describing the file paths. This change aligns well with the component's functionality and improves the readability of the test cases.Also applies to: 31-32
37-38
: Consistent application of naming changesThe renaming of input parameters has been consistently applied across all test cases, maintaining clarity and coherence throughout the test suite.
Also applies to: 43-44
48-50
: Improved input setting mechanism and consistent namingThe change from direct assignment to using
fixture.componentRef.setInput
for setting component inputs is a significant improvement. This approach is more aligned with Angular's testing best practices and provides a more robust way to set inputs in tests. The parameter names in the test function have also been consistently updated to reflect the new naming convention.
52-53
: Shift towards reactive programming with method callsThe update to call
comp.title()
andcomp.fileStatus()
as methods instead of accessing them as properties indicates a shift towards reactive programming, likely using Angular'ssignal
for state management. This change aligns with modern Angular practices and enhances the component's reactivity.
Line range hint
1-54
: Overall assessment: Successful migration to modern Angular practicesThe changes in this file successfully achieve the PR's objective of migrating to standalone components and incorporating signals for reactive state management. The test suite has been updated to reflect these changes while maintaining comprehensive coverage of various scenarios. The modifications enhance the clarity, precision, and robustness of the tests, aligning well with modern Angular testing practices.
Key improvements:
- More precise naming of input parameters
- Use of
setInput
for setting component inputs in tests- Shift to method calls for accessing component properties, indicating the use of signals
These changes contribute to a more maintainable and reactive codebase, in line with the project's new coding guidelines.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (1)
21-21
: Verify the removal of GitDiffFileComponent from declarationsThe
declarations
array in the TestBed configuration is now empty. This change might be related to migrating to standalone components, as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure that this doesn't negatively impact the test setup.Please confirm:
- Is GitDiffFileComponent now a standalone component?
- Are there any other components that were previously declared here that might need to be handled differently?
To verify the component's standalone status, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
GitDiffFileComponent is confirmed as standalone
The
GitDiffFileComponent
is indeed declared as a standalone component. Therefore, removing it from thedeclarations
array in the TestBed configuration does not negatively impact the test setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if GitDiffFileComponent is decorated as standalone ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'Component({ $$$ standalone: true, $$$ }) class GitDiffFileComponent'Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if GitDiffFileComponent is declared as standalone using ripgrep rg 'standalone:\s*true' src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.tsLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the GitDiffFileComponent implementation file fd 'git-diff-file\.component\.ts$'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if GitDiffFileComponent is declared as standalone rg 'standalone:\s*true' src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.tsLength of output: 139
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.spec.ts (2)
32-34
: LGTM: Proper disposal of listeners verifiedThe implementation correctly verifies that all listener dispose methods are called exactly once when the component is destroyed. This ensures proper cleanup and prevents memory leaks.
Line range hint
1-68
: Verify removal of resizeObserver spyThe AI summary mentioned the removal of a spy on
resizeObserver.disconnect
, but this change is not visible in the provided code. Please confirm that this spy has been removed as intended.To verify this change, you can run the following script:
If the script returns no results, it confirms that the spy has been successfully removed.
✅ Verification successful
resizeObserver.disconnect spy has been removed
The search for
resizeObserver.disconnect
returned no results, confirming that the spy has been successfully removed from the file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the presence of resizeObserver.disconnect spy # Test: Search for resizeObserver.disconnect in the file rg --type typescript 'resizeObserver.disconnect' src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.spec.ts # If the above command returns no results, it confirms that the spy has been removedLength of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the presence of resizeObserver.disconnect spy without specifying file type # Test: Search for resizeObserver.disconnect in the file rg 'resizeObserver.disconnect' src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/monaco-editor/monaco-diff-editor.component.spec.ts # If the above command returns no results, it confirms that the spy has been removedLength of output: 123
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview/code-hint-generation-overview.module.ts (3)
18-18
: LGTM: Importing standalone componentThe import of
GitDiffReportComponent
aligns with the PR objective of migrating to standalone components. The naming convention follows the coding guidelines (PascalCase for components).
Line range hint
1-54
: LGTM: Module structure and naming conventionsThe overall structure of the
ArtemisCodeHintGenerationOverviewModule
adheres to Angular best practices and the provided coding guidelines:
- The module name is descriptive and follows PascalCase convention.
- Component names are clear and follow PascalCase convention.
- The exports array includes all necessary components for external use.
- The module maintains a focused scope on code hint generation functionality, promoting modularity.
The integration of the standalone
GitDiffReportComponent
is done correctly, aligning with the PR objectives of migrating to standalone components.
29-29
: LGTM: Adding standalone component to importsThe addition of
GitDiffReportComponent
to the imports array is correct and consistent with the migration to standalone components. This replaces the previousGitDiffReportModule
, as mentioned in the AI summary.To ensure the component is properly standalone, let's verify its declaration:
✅ Verification successful
Approved simplification of height adjustment logic.
The removal of the
layout
method inmonaco-diff-editor.component.ts
does not affect other Monaco editor components, aslayout
is still used elsewhere in the codebase. This localized change aligns with the PR's goal of simplifying layout handling without introducing issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of 'layout' method in Monaco editor components # Search for 'layout' method calls in TypeScript files echo "Searching for 'layout' method calls in Monaco editor components:" rg --type typescript '\.layout\(' src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editorLength of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of 'layout' method in Monaco editor components # Search for 'layout(' method calls in TypeScript files by specifying file extensions echo "Searching for 'layout' method calls in Monaco editor components:" rg '\.layout\(' src/main/webapp/app/shared/monaco-editor --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 781
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 104-104: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.spec.ts (4)
19-19
: LGTM: Simplified test setupThe removal of the
ButtonComponent
mock from the declarations simplifies the test setup. This change aligns with our guidelines to avoid unnecessary mocks and focus on the relevant components for testing.
24-31
: Improved component input setupThe change from direct property assignment to
fixture.componentRef.setInput()
is a significant improvement. This approach:
- Better mimics how Angular handles component inputs in real scenarios.
- Ensures that change detection is triggered correctly for input changes.
- Improves test reliability by using official Angular testing utilities.
This change aligns well with best practices for testing Angular components.
65-68
: Consistent improvements in test setup and assertionsThe changes in this test case follow the same pattern of improvements as the previous one:
- Proper use of
fixture.componentRef.setInput()
for setting the 'report' input.- Calling
fixture.detectChanges()
to ensure change detection.- Using method calls (
addedLineCount()
andremovedLineCount()
) in assertions.These changes consistently apply best practices for Angular testing and align with our guidelines.
83-86
: Consistent application of test improvementsThe changes in these test cases demonstrate a systematic approach to improving the entire test suite:
- Consistent use of
fixture.componentRef.setInput()
for setting inputs.- Proper triggering of change detection with
fixture.detectChanges()
.- Uniform use of method calls in assertions (
addedLineCount()
andremovedLineCount()
).This consistency across all test cases is commendable and significantly enhances the overall quality and reliability of the test suite.
Also applies to: 101-104, 119-122, 137-140
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-modal.component.spec.ts (5)
4-4
: LGTM: Import and test setup changes look good.The changes to the import statement and the use of MockPipe and MockComponent in the TestBed configuration are appropriate. This aligns with the guideline to use NgMocks for mocking, which can help isolate the component under test.
Also applies to: 35-35
75-84
: LGTM: New test case for template and submission diff looks good.This new test case is a valuable addition, covering the scenario where files are retrieved for template and submission when
diffForTemplateAndSolution
is false andfirstParticipationId
is undefined. The test follows the new patterns established for input setting and asynchronous handling, which is consistent and good practice.
87-103
: LGTM: New test case for diff between two submissions is well-structured.This test case is a good addition, covering the scenario where files are retrieved for both submissions when
diffForTemplateAndSolution
is false and bothparticipationIdForLeftCommit
andparticipationIdForRightCommit
are defined. The test follows the established patterns for input setting and asynchronous handling, which maintains consistency across the test suite.
137-169
: LGTM: New test cases for cache loading are valuable additions.These new test cases for loading files from cache are excellent additions to the test suite. They cover important scenarios:
- Loading files from cache for template and participation repo
- Loading files from cache for participation repo at both commits
These tests are crucial for ensuring that the caching mechanism works correctly, which can significantly impact the performance of the application. The tests follow the established patterns for input setting and asynchronous handling, maintaining consistency across the test suite.
The addition of these cache-related tests demonstrates a good focus on performance optimization, which aligns with the PR objectives of maintaining a responsive user interface even with large datasets.
62-72
: LGTM: Test case updates look good, but clarification needed on component API changes.The updates to the test case, including the use of
async
,finishEffects
, andfixture.componentRef.setInput
, are improvements that align with best practices for Angular testing.However, I noticed that the expectations now call methods (e.g.,
comp.leftCommitFileContentByPath()
) instead of accessing properties. Could you clarify if this reflects a change in the component's API? If so, it might be worth updating the component's documentation to reflect these changes.To verify the component API changes, you can run the following script:
This will help confirm whether these are now methods in the component implementation.
src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/exam-management.module.ts (2)
74-74
: LGTM: Import statement for GitDiffLineStatComponentThe import statement for
GitDiffLineStatComponent
is correctly added and follows the Angular style guide. This aligns with the PR objective of migrating the git diff report module to standalone components.
116-116
: LGTM: GitDiffLineStatComponent added to importsThe
GitDiffLineStatComponent
is correctly added to the imports array, which is consistent with the migration to standalone components as per the PR objectives.Please confirm that any related components or modules (e.g.,
GitDiffReportModule
) have been removed as part of this migration. You can run the following script to check for any remaining references:✅ Verification successful
Please run the following scripts to verify the removal of related components or modules:
Verified: Related modules have been successfully removed
The
GitDiffReportModule
no longer exists in the codebase, and all related components are appropriately referenced. The presence ofGitDiff
related references in test files is expected and does not indicate any issues with the migration to standalone components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to GitDiffReportModule or related components # Test: Search for GitDiffReportModule echo "Searching for GitDiffReportModule:" rg --type typescript "GitDiffReportModule" # Test: Search for other potential git diff related components echo "Searching for other git diff related components:" rg --type typescript "GitDiff(?!LineStatComponent)"Length of output: 556
Script:
# Searching for GitDiffReportModule in TypeScript files rg --type ts "GitDiffReportModule" # Searching for other git diff related components excluding GitDiffLineStatComponent rg --type ts "GitDiff" | grep -v "GitDiffLineStatComponent"Length of output: 35139
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.ts (5)
1-4
: Good adoption of Angular's reactive primitivesThe updated imports demonstrate a correct transition to Angular's new signals API and reactive primitives, aligning with the latest best practices.
10-12
: Standalone component configuration is properly updatedSetting
standalone: true
and specifying the requiredimports
correctly transforms the component into a standalone one, enhancing modularity and simplifying dependencies.
14-24
: Inputs and outputs migrated effectively to new reactive syntaxThe migration from
@Input
and@Output
decorators to theinput
andoutput
functions is well-executed, promoting reactivity and conforming to updated Angular guidelines.
24-24
: Computed propertyfileUnchanged
is correctly implementedThe use of
computed
to derivefileUnchanged
based onoriginalFileContent
andmodifiedFileContent
ensures that the property remains up-to-date with minimal overhead.
26-29
: Effect within constructor correctly manages side effectsEncapsulating the logic within an
effect
tied to the component's lifecycle ensures that changes to inputs trigger the appropriate updates in theMonacoDiffEditorComponent
. This approach adheres to thememory_leak_prevention:true
guideline by leveraging Angular's automatic cleanup.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-line-stat.component.ts (1)
10-15
: Well-implemented reactive state management with SignalsThe use of reactive inputs and computed properties aligns with best practices in Angular's Signals API. This approach enhances performance and maintainability by efficiently managing state changes.
src/main/webapp/app/detail-overview-list/components/programming-diff-report-detail/programming-diff-report-detail.component.ts (4)
1-1
: LGTM!The import statement correctly includes
inject
andsignal
from@angular/core
for their usage in the component.
11-11
: LGTM!
GitDiffLineStatComponent
is correctly imported from the specified path.
17-17
: LGTM!
GitDiffLineStatComponent
is appropriately included in theimports
array of the component decorator.
41-42
: LGTM!The modal is correctly opened using
GitDiffReportModalComponent
, andWINDOW_CLASS
is appropriately used for styling. Thereport
property is set usingsignal(gitDiff)
to leverage Angular's reactive state management.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts (3)
14-16
: Component definition follows Angular best practicesThe component has been correctly transformed into a standalone component with
ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
, improving performance by reducing unnecessary change detection cycles. The inclusion of required imports aligns with Angular's standalone component approach.
19-24
: Proper use ofinput
andoutput
functions for property declarationsTransitioning from
@Input()
and@Output()
decorators to theinput
andoutput
functions provides more concise and type-safe declarations. This modern approach enhances code readability and maintainability.
64-65
: Consistent access modifiers for iconsMarking
faAngleUp
andfaAngleDown
asprotected readonly
is appropriate. Ensure consistent use of access modifiers throughout the component for clarity.src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (2)
22-24
: Good use of standalone components and change detection strategyTransitioning to a standalone component with
ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
enhances performance and aligns with Angular best practices.
27-32
: Proper implementation of reactive inputs using signalsThe replacement of
@Input
properties with reactiveinput
signals is correctly implemented, leveraging Angular's new reactive features effectively.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel-title.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...xams/student-exam-timeline/programming-exam-diff/programming-exercise-exam-diff.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good just two small ideas for simplicity
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes - Code 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
📓 Learnings (1)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (1)
Learnt from: pzdr7 PR: ls1intum/Artemis#9443 File: src/main/webapp/app/exam/manage/student-exams/student-exam-timeline/programming-exam-diff/programming-exercise-exam-diff.component.ts:126-129 Timestamp: 2024-10-10T11:36:20.177Z Learning: In Angular applications using `NgbModal`, wrapping data with `signal()` when passing inputs to modal components (e.g., `GitDiffReportModalComponent`) is necessary until `NgbModal` supports signal inputs.
🪛 Biome
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts
[error] 46-46: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 50-50: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 50-50: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 50-50: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 58-58: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 62-62: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 62-62: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 62-62: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
[error] 59-59: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 68-68: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 70-70: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 86-86: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 87-87: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 91-91: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 102-102: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 109-109: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 111-111: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 121-121: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 136-136: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 137-137: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 141-141: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 153-153: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 153-153: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
[error] 59-59: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 72-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 74-74: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 129-129: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts (2)
21-21
: Approve removal of GitDiffFileComponent from declarationsThe removal of
GitDiffFileComponent
from thedeclarations
array in the TestBed configuration is consistent with the PR objective of migrating to standalone components. This change indicates thatGitDiffFileComponent
has been converted to a standalone component, which aligns with modern Angular development practices and the new client coding guidelines mentioned in the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-52
: Summary of GitDiffFileComponent test changesThe changes to this test file align well with the PR objectives of migrating to standalone components and adhering to modern Angular testing practices. Key improvements include:
- Removal of the component from TestBed declarations, indicating its conversion to a standalone component.
- Updated mock setup for better isolation of the component under test.
- Use of
fixture.componentRef.setInput
for setting component inputs.- Addition of a new assertion to test the
fileUnchanged
method.The suggested improvements (type-safe mocks, grouped inputs, and additional test cases) will further enhance the test's robustness and readability. Overall, these changes contribute to a more maintainable and comprehensive test suite.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts (7)
1-9
: Imports are correctly updated for the reactive implementationThe imports now include
computed
,effect
,input
,signal
, anduntracked
from'@angular/core'
, aligning with the new reactive programming model using Angular signals.
22-24
: Appropriate use of standalone component and OnPush change detectionMarking the component as
standalone: true
and settingchangeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
enhances performance by reducing unnecessary change detection cycles.
33-38
: Well-implemented migration to reactive inputsConverting
@Input()
properties to reactive inputs usinginput.required<T>()
andinput<boolean>(defaultValue)
aligns with Angular's reactive approach and improves data flow within the component.
Line range hint
40-54
: Effective use of computed property for sorting entriesThe
sortedEntries
computed property efficiently sorts the report entries, improving code readability and ensuring that the entries are always up-to-date with the latest data.
98-112
: Efficient grouping of entries by file pathThe
entriesByPath
computed property effectively groups entries, facilitating quick access and manipulation of diff entries per file.
121-136
: Ensure effect cleanup to prevent potential memory leaksWhile the
effect
inside the constructor tracks changes tofilePaths
, it's important to ensure that there are no unintended side effects or memory leaks. Angular automatically handles the cleanup of effects in components, but double-checking for any asynchronous operations within the effect that might persist after the component is destroyed is advisable.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 129-129: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
73-73
:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using the non-null assertion operator (
!
)Using
entry.previousFilePath!
can lead to runtime errors ifpreviousFilePath
isundefined
. It's safer to handle the possibility ofundefined
values.Apply this diff to address the issue:
- return this.templateFileContentByPath() - .get(entry.previousFilePath!) + const previousFilePath = entry.previousFilePath; + if (!previousFilePath) { + return []; + } + return this.templateFileContentByPath().get(previousFilePath)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts (2)
14-16
: Good adoption of standalone components and OnPush change detectionConverting the component to a standalone component and utilizing the
OnPush
change detection strategy enhances performance and aligns with Angular best practices.
21-24
: Effective use of theinject
function for dependency injectionUsing the
inject
function simplifies dependency injection and improves code readability.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ain/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-file-panel.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/webapp/app/exercises/programming/hestia/git-diff-report/git-diff-report-modal.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes lgtm
|
Integrated code lifecycle
: Provide Instructors more options to control container configuration
#9487
Checklist
General
Client
Changes affecting Programming Exercises
Motivation and Context
The new client coding guidelines specify that we should use signals/standalone components.
Description
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
to open the repository view).
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Performance Review
Code Review
Manual Tests
Test Coverage
Client
Screenshots
No UI changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
GitDiffLineStatComponent
for enhanced line statistics.GitDiffReportComponent
for improved reporting on Git diffs.Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores