Tutorial groups: Redesign overview page
#9445
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
tests
client
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
deployment-error
PaRangger
removed
the
deployment-error
MaximilianAnzinger
changed the title
Tutorial Groups: Redesign overview pageTutorial groups: Redesign overview page
PaRangger
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test6.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a comprehensive redesign of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-180: Overall assessment: Test file updates are comprehensive and well-structured.The changes to this test file are consistent with the PR objectives of redesigning the tutorial group overview page. The additions of MockComponent for IconCardComponent and MockDirective for TranslateDirective in both test setups (MockWrapperComponent and TutorialGroupDetailComponent) demonstrate a thorough approach to updating the test environment.
These modifications ensure that the tests accurately reflect the changes in the component structure and dependencies. The consistent use of mocks across different test scenarios is a good practice that maintains test isolation and reliability.
One suggestion for further improvement:
Consider adding specific test cases for the new IconCardComponent integration if it plays a significant role in the redesigned UI. This would help ensure that the new layout is functioning as expected within the TutorialGroupDetailComponent.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.scss (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (5 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-groups-shared.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/de/tutorialGroups.json (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/en/tutorialGroups.json (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-groups-shared.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/tutorialGroups.json (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🪛 Biome
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts
[error] 19-19: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
🔇 Additional comments (32)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.html (2)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate use of Bootstrap classes for card layout.The card structure using Bootstrap classes
cardandh-100is well-implemented, ensuring a responsive and full-height card layout.
8-11: LGTM: Appropriate use of content projection.The use of
<hr />for visual separation and<ng-content>for content projection is well-implemented. This structure allows for flexible and reusable card content.src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.scss (3)
1-1: LGTM: Good use of SCSS variable for tutor image sizeThe introduction of the
$tutor-image-sizevariable is a good practice. It promotes consistency across the component and makes future adjustments easier. The value of 4.5rem seems appropriate for a profile image size in the context of a redesigned, more compact layout.
14-16: Please clarify the purpose of the negative marginThe addition of a negative bottom margin (-1rem) to the
.markdown-previewclass could help reduce whitespace, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, the specific purpose of this adjustment isn't entirely clear from the context provided.Could you please explain the intended effect of this negative margin? Are there any potential layout issues that need to be considered with this approach?
Line range hint
1-33: Overall: Well-structured SCSS changes that align with PR objectivesThe changes to this SCSS file effectively support the redesign of the tutorial group overview page. The introduction of the
$tutor-image-sizevariable, along with the new classes for tutor images and default images, contributes to a more consistent and organized layout. The use of CSS custom properties for colors is a good practice for maintaining a cohesive design system.The styles appear to reduce unnecessary whitespace and improve the presentation of information, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is clean, well-structured, and follows SCSS best practices.
Minor suggestions have been made for further enhancements, but overall, these changes seem to effectively improve the UI as intended.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are correct and follow best practices.The imports are well-organized and include all necessary dependencies for the component's functionality. The use of FontAwesome icons and shared modules promotes consistency and code reuse across the application.
7-13: LGTM: Component decorator is well-configured.The component is correctly set up as a standalone component, which aligns with modern Angular practices. The imports, selector, and file references are all properly configured. The 'jhi-' prefix in the selector suggests adherence to project-specific naming conventions.
15-17: LGTM: Input properties are well-defined.The use of the new Angular 16+ input() syntax for defining properties is modern and concise. The property names follow the camelCase convention as per the coding guidelines. Providing default values for the inputs enhances the component's usability.
1-20: Overall, the IconCardComponent is well-implemented.The component follows Angular best practices and project-specific guidelines. It uses modern features like standalone components and the new input() syntax. The code is clean, well-organized, and promotes reusability.
Minor suggestions for improvement:
- Remove the empty constructor.
- Consider localizing the default 'Title' string.
These changes will further enhance the code quality and maintainability of the component.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 19-19: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow best practices.The imports include necessary testing utilities and correctly use MockDirective for isolating the component under test.
6-9: LGTM: Test suite setup follows Angular testing best practices.The describe block and variable declarations for component and fixture are correctly implemented.
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-groups-shared.module.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement for IconCardComponent.The import statement follows Angular style guidelines and uses the correct naming convention (PascalCase) for the component. The import path suggests proper organization of shared components.
Line range hint
1-38: Summary: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications to this module file, specifically the addition of
IconCardComponent, align well with the PR objectives of redesigning the tutorial group overview page. The introduction of this new component suggests the implementation of new UI elements, which is consistent with the goal of organizing information into a more horizontal layout using categorized cards.However, ensure that all new UI components, including
IconCardComponent, adhere to the responsive layout requirements mentioned in the PR objectives. This will help in reducing scrolling and improving accessibility as intended.
19-19: Verify if IconCardComponent is a standalone component.The addition of
IconCardComponentto theimportsarray suggests that it might be a standalone component. Typically, components are added to thedeclarationsarray unless they are standalone components (a feature introduced in Angular 14+).Please verify that
IconCardComponentis indeed a standalone component. If it's not, consider moving it to thedeclarationsarray instead.Let's verify if IconCardComponent is a standalone component:
✅ Verification successful
IconCardComponent is correctly configured as a standalone component.
The addition to the
importsarray is appropriate.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if IconCardComponent is a standalone component # Test: Search for standalone: true in IconCardComponent rg --type typescript 'standalone:\s*true' app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts # If the above command doesn't find anything, it's likely not a standalone component if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "IconCardComponent might not be a standalone component. Consider moving it to the declarations array." fiLength of output: 351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if IconCardComponent is a standalone component # Corrected Test: Search for standalone: true in IconCardComponent rg --type ts 'standalone:\s*true' app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts # If the above command doesn't find anything, it's likely not a standalone component if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "IconCardComponent might not be a standalone component. Consider moving it to the declarations array." fiLength of output: 392
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the IconCardComponent file # Search for all files named 'icon-card.component.ts' in the repository fd 'icon-card\.component\.ts$'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if IconCardComponent is a standalone component # Search for 'standalone: true' in the IconCardComponent file rg 'standalone:\s*true' src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts # If the above command doesn't find anything, it's likely not a standalone component if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "IconCardComponent might not be a standalone component. Consider moving it to the declarations array." fiLength of output: 125
src/test/javascript/spec/component/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail.component.spec.ts (5)
4-4: LGTM: New imports are consistent with test changes.The added imports for
MockDirective,TranslateDirective, andIconCardComponentalign well with the modifications in the test setup. These additions support the enhanced mocking strategy in the updated tests.Also applies to: 23-24
66-66: LGTM: MockComponent for IconCardComponent added.The addition of
MockComponent(IconCardComponent)to the declarations is a good practice. It ensures that the IconCardComponent is properly mocked in the test environment, isolating the component under test and potentially improving test performance.
71-71: LGTM: MockDirective for TranslateDirective added.The addition of
MockDirective(TranslateDirective)to the declarations is appropriate. It ensures that the translation functionality is properly mocked in the test environment, which helps isolate the component under test from translation dependencies and potentially improves test reliability.
118-118: LGTM: Consistent use of MockComponent for IconCardComponent.The addition of
MockComponent(IconCardComponent)in the TutorialGroupDetailComponent test setup is consistent with the changes in the MockWrapperComponent. This ensures that the IconCardComponent is properly mocked in both test scenarios, maintaining consistency and isolation in the test environment.
121-121: LGTM: Consistent use of MockDirective for TranslateDirective.The addition of
MockDirective(TranslateDirective)in the TutorialGroupDetailComponent test setup mirrors the changes in the MockWrapperComponent. This consistency ensures that the TranslateDirective is properly mocked across all test scenarios, maintaining a uniform approach to handling translations in the test environment.src/main/webapp/i18n/en/tutorialGroups.json (5)
58-58: LGTM: Improved JSON formattingThe addition of a trailing comma to the
profilePictureAltentry improves JSON formatting consistency. This change makes it easier to add new entries in the future and aligns with best practices for maintaining JSON files.
59-59: LGTM: Added localization for "Name" labelThe addition of the
"name": "Name"entry provides necessary localization support for the redesigned UI mentioned in the PR objectives. This change aligns with the goal of improving the tutorial group overview page's layout and information presentation.
60-60: LGTM: Added localization for "Information" labelThe addition of the
"information": "Information"entry provides necessary localization support for the redesigned UI mentioned in the PR objectives. This change supports the new categorized cards layout, contributing to the improved organization and accessibility of the tutorial group overview page.
58-61: Summary: Localization updates align with PR objectivesThe changes to the localization file support the redesigned UI for the tutorial group overview page as described in the PR objectives. The new entries for "Name", "Information", and "Not Online" status contribute to the improved layout and information presentation.
All changes are consistent with the existing file structure and naming conventions. The only point of consideration is the potential duplication between the new
isNotOnlineentry and the existingofflineentry in thegenericsection. Please review the usage of these keys as suggested in the previous comment to ensure both are necessary and distinct.Overall, these localization updates effectively support the UI improvements outlined in the PR objectives.
61-61: LGTM: Added localization for "Not Online" status, but verify necessityThe addition of the
"isNotOnline": "Not Online"entry provides localization support for displaying the offline status of tutorial groups in the redesigned UI. This aligns with the PR objectives of improving information presentation.However, please verify if this new entry is necessary, as there's an existing
"offline": "Offline"entry in thegenericsection that might serve a similar purpose. If both are needed, consider adding a comment explaining the difference to avoid confusion for future maintainers.To check for potential duplication, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Added localization for "Not Online" status
The addition of the
"isNotOnline": "Not Online"entry provides localization support for displaying the offline status of tutorial groups in the redesigned UI. This aligns with the PR objectives of improving information presentation.No existing usages of
"offline"or"isNotOnline"were found elsewhere in the codebase, indicating that this new entry does not duplicate existing keys.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of both "offline" and "isNotOnline" keys in the codebase echo "Searching for 'offline' key usage:" rg --type typescript --type html "(?<!')\b(offline|'offline')\b(?!')" src/main/webapp echo "\nSearching for 'isNotOnline' key usage:" rg --type typescript --type html "(?<!')\b(isNotOnline|'isNotOnline')\b(?!')" src/main/webappLength of output: 875
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of both "offline" and "isNotOnline" keys in the codebase without using look-around echo "Searching for 'offline' key usage:" rg --type typescript --type html '"offline"\s*:' src/main/webapp echo "\nSearching for 'isNotOnline' key usage:" rg --type typescript --type html '"isNotOnline"\s*:' src/main/webappLength of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of both "offline" and "isNotOnline" keys in the codebase by specifying file extensions echo "Searching for 'offline' key usage:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.html" '"offline"\s*:' src/main/webapp echo "\nSearching for 'isNotOnline' key usage:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.html" '"isNotOnline"\s*:' src/main/webappLength of output: 325
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/tutorialGroups.json (3)
58-58: LGTM: Improved JSON formattingThe addition of the trailing comma improves consistency in the JSON structure and follows best practices for maintainability.
59-59: LGTM: Appropriate translation for "name"The translation for "name" is correct and concise. It uses a neutral term that doesn't require informal/formal distinction.
60-60: LGTM: Correct translation for "information"The translation for "information" is accurate, using the same word in German. It's a neutral term that doesn't require informal/formal distinction.
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (4)
9-9: Appropriate Import of FontAwesome IconsThe import statement correctly imports the necessary FontAwesome icons for use in the component.
37-40: Property Names Adhere to CamelCase ConventionThe properties
tutorInitials,tutorDefaultProfilePictureHue,isMessagingEnabled, andutilizationare well-named usingcamelCase, complying with the coding guidelines.
110-110: Consistent Update of Dependent Properties After Attendance RecalculationCalling
this.getTutorialDetail();after recalculating attendance details ensures that all dependent properties, such asutilization, are updated accordingly. This maintains consistency in the component's state.
71-71: Verify the Invocation ofgetTutorialDetail()inngOnChangesCalling
this.getTutorialDetail();withinngOnChangesensures that component properties are updated when input properties change. However, confirm that this does not introduce unnecessary computations or side effects, especially ifngOnChangestriggers frequently.Run the following script to check for potential performance issues related to
getTutorialDetail():✅ Verification successful
Verified: Invocation of
getTutorialDetail()inngOnChangesdoes not introduce unnecessary computations or side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if getTutorialDetail() has side effects that could affect performance. # Search for all usages of getTutorialDetail() in the TypeScript files to ensure it doesn't cause unintended side effects. rg --type ts 'getTutorialDetail\(\)' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 4532
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (1)
95-96: Ensure Language Information is Localized
tutorialGroup.languagemight be a code or enum that isn't localized. To provide a better user experience, ensure that the language is displayed in the user's locale.Please check if
tutorialGroup.languageis a localized string. If not, consider using a translation pipe or mapping it to a localized value.
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.scss
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.scss
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...p/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (5 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-organized.The imports follow Angular style guide recommendations, including the correct order (Angular core, third-party libraries, application-specific imports). All imported items are used in the component, and necessary dependencies are included.
7-13: LGTM: Component decorator is well-configured.The component decorator follows Angular best practices:
- Standalone component configuration is used, aligning with modern Angular development.
- The selector 'jhi-icon-card' follows the project's naming convention.
- Template and style files are correctly linked.
- Necessary shared modules are imported, promoting code reuse.
14-16: LGTM: Modern input syntax is used correctly.The component class uses the new input() syntax for defining input properties, which aligns with the latest Angular practices. The default value for headerIcon is appropriately set to faCircleInfo.
17-17: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider localizing the default 'Title' string.
To maintain consistency with localization practices and support multiple languages, consider using a localized string for the default 'Title' value.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1)
37-38: Unnecessaryfixture.detectChanges()After Input AssignmentAfter assigning inputs directly to the component instance, Angular change detection should be run to update the view. However, since we're testing component properties and not the rendered template, you might not need
fixture.detectChanges();here. If you're asserting on the DOM, then this is appropriate.Please verify if
fixture.detectChanges();is necessary in this context.src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (3)
9-9: Import statement follows best practicesThe import of FontAwesome icons is correctly formatted and uses single quotes, adhering to the coding guidelines.
37-40: Properties are properly defined with appropriate naming conventionsThe newly added properties are well-named using camelCase, and their types are correctly specified.
71-71: Appropriate method call to update component stateCalling
this.getTutorialDetail();withinngOnChangesensures that the component updates its internal state whenever input properties change, which is appropriate.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...p/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...p/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts (1)
1-5: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Organize imports for better readability.
Consider reorganizing the imports alphabetically and grouping them by module or functionality for improved readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to reorganize the imports:
import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing'; +import { faCircleInfo, faCoffee } from '@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons'; import { MockDirective } from 'ng-mocks'; import { IconCardComponent } from 'app/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component'; import { TranslateDirective } from 'app/shared/language/translate.directive'; -import { faCircleInfo, faCoffee } from '@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/icon-card/icon-card.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (1)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts (2)
94-94:⚠️ Potential issueUse Strict Null Checks for
teachingAssistantIdThe current ternary operator may incorrectly handle cases where
teachingAssistantIdis0, as0is falsy in JavaScript. This could result in using'default'instead of the actual ID.Update the condition to use a strict null check:
- this.tutorDefaultProfilePictureHue = getBackgroundColorHue(tutorialGroup.teachingAssistantId ? tutorialGroup.teachingAssistantId.toString() : 'default'); + this.tutorDefaultProfilePictureHue = getBackgroundColorHue(tutorialGroup.teachingAssistantId != null ? tutorialGroup.teachingAssistantId.toString() : 'default');
97-100:⚠️ Potential issueHandle Zero Values Correctly in Utilization Calculation
The condition
if (tutorialGroup.averageAttendance && tutorialGroup.capacity)will evaluate tofalseif eitheraverageAttendanceorcapacityis0, even though0can be a valid value. This may preventutilizationfrom being calculated when appropriate.Also, ensure division by zero is prevented when
capacityis0.Adjust the condition to include strict null checks and explicitly handle zero:
- if (tutorialGroup.averageAttendance && tutorialGroup.capacity) { + if (tutorialGroup.averageAttendance != null && tutorialGroup.capacity != null && tutorialGroup.capacity !== 0) {src/main/webapp/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html (3)
8-41: LGTM: Teaching Assistant Details SectionThe implementation of the teaching assistant details using
jhi-icon-cardand Bootstrap grid classes is correct. The use of conditional rendering with@ifenhances readability, and the component effectively displays the tutor's information.
44-88: LGTM: Utilization Metrics SectionThe utilization metrics are accurately presented, and the use of progress bars with dynamic classes based on utilization thresholds is appropriate. The inclusion of tooltips improves user understanding.
90-132: LGTM: Tutorial Group Information SectionThe tutorial group information is well-organized, and the conditional translation keys enhance internationalization support. The display logic for online status is clear and user-friendly.
...p/app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...app/course/tutorial-groups/shared/tutorial-group-detail/tutorial-group-detail.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Great improvements 👍 let's merge this PR asap |
PaRangger
requested review from
FelberMartin,
asliayk,
cremertim,
rabeatwork and
anian03
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
deployment-error
SimonEntholzer
added
deploy:artemis-test1
and removed
deployment-error
SimonEntholzer
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test1.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested on TS1, works as described, but I have some small remarks:
- I'm a bit confused about the icon for "Tutor". Why does it have a checkmark? I don't really see what that checkmark says. Just having the person icon seems sufficient to me.
- The placement of the conversation channel link under "Tutor" might be a bit confusing. Maybe we could rename this section into something more broad like "Tutorial" (and then "Tutor" instead of "Name", as well as the schedule in this section instead?)
- An option to start a DM with the tutor might be nice on this screen :)
Thanks for these suggestions. Let’s work on them in a follow-up |
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
Currently there tutor group overview page shows a lot of whitespace as well as unneccesary information. The user has to scroll down quite far to reach a lot of the relevant information like location or session times.
Description
I redesigned the tutorial page to show the same information as before but in a more horizontal way using categorized cards. I removed the course title and group name because it was redundant. The rest of the information should still be displayed.
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
(Tutorial groups can be created in the edit course menu)
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Performance Review
Code Review
Manual Tests
Exam Mode Test
Performance Tests
Test Coverage
Screenshots
Before:
After:
Within the manage course menu it should look similar:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
IconCardComponentfor improved icon and title representation.Bug Fixes
Tests
IconCardComponentand updated tests forTutorialGroupDetailComponentto include new mock components and directives.