Communication: Refactor consecutive message view
#9456
Conversation
asliayk
added
tests
client
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces various enhancements to the messaging and posting components within the application. Key changes include the addition of the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 50
🧹 Outside diff range comments (6)
src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/answer-post.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
5-12: Consider consistent property initializationFor better consistency and readability, consider initializing all properties either inline or in the constructor. This would make the code more uniform and easier to maintain.
Here's a suggested refactor:
export class AnswerPost extends Posting { public resolvesPost: boolean = false; public post?: Post; public isConsecutive: boolean = false; constructor() { super(); } }This approach initializes all properties inline, removing the need for initialization in the constructor and making the code more concise.
src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/post.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
16-24: Consider adding type annotation and property description.To further improve code readability and maintainability:
- Add a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
isConsecutiveproperty.- Consider adding a type annotation to the constructor.
Here's an example of how you could implement these suggestions:
/** Indicates whether this post is consecutive to the previous one in the conversation. */ public isConsecutive: boolean = false; constructor(data: Partial<Post> = {}) { super(); Object.assign(this, data); // set default values this.visibleForStudents = this.visibleForStudents ?? true; this.displayPriority = this.displayPriority ?? DisplayPriority.NONE; }These changes would enhance the code's self-documentation and type safety.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.component.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-48: Summary: Effective UI improvements for emoji reactionsThe changes in this file successfully implement the UI improvements outlined in the PR objectives. The new
.emoji-containerclass provides a clean, organized layout for emoji reactions, while the updated.reaction-buttonclass ensures consistent styling. These modifications will enhance the visual coherence of the chat interface and support better theming capabilities.To further improve maintainability and theming flexibility, consider creating a separate SCSS file for theme variables (if not already present). This would centralize all color and styling variables, making it easier to manage and update themes across the application.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/post-header/post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
65-93: Enhance expectation specificityWhile the test file generally adheres to the coding guidelines, there's room for improvement in using more specific matchers for some expectations. Consider the following suggestions:
- Replace
expect(...).not.toBeNull()withexpect(...).toBeDefined()orexpect(...).toBeInstanceOf(HTMLElement)where appropriate.- Use
toBeTrue()instead oftoBe(true)for boolean assertions.- Consider using
toContainHTML()ortoHaveClass()for more specific element checks.Example refactor for the "should display resolved icon on resolved post header" test:
it('should display resolved icon on resolved post header', () => { component.posting = metisPostExerciseUser1; component.posting.resolved = true; component.ngOnInit(); fixture.detectChanges(); expect(getElement(debugElement, '.resolved')).toBeInstanceOf(HTMLElement); expect(getElement(debugElement, '.resolved')).toHaveClass('resolved'); });These changes will make the tests more robust and align better with the provided coding guidelines.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-162: Overall structure is good, but consider performance improvements.The new test case integrates well with the existing structure of the file. The use of Jest and NgMocks aligns with the specified coding guidelines. However, consider the following points:
The file uses a mix of
fakeAsyncand non-fakeAsynctests. Ensure this is intentional and consistent with the asynchronous nature of the tested methods.As per the coding guidelines, consider implementing performance improvements by mocking irrelevant dependencies. Review the mocked services and components to ensure only necessary dependencies are included in each test.
The test file adheres to the jest testing guidelines as specified. Good job on maintaining consistency with the existing testing patterns.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 141-141: Forbidden non-null assertion.
Unsafe fix: Replace with optional chain operator ?. This operator includes runtime checks, so it is safer than the compile-only non-null assertion operator
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
33-75: Add JSDoc comments to methods for better documentationThe methods
ngOnInit(),ngOnChanges(),isAnyReactionCountAboveZero(),deletePosting(),setMayEditOrDelete(), andonEditPosting()lack JSDoc comments. Adding descriptive comments to these methods will enhance code readability and maintainability.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 26-26: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
[error] 29-31: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
- src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/answer-post.model.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/post.model.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/metis.module.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (4 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.html (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.scss (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/post-header/post-header.component.html (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/post-header/post-header.component.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.ts (7 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.directive.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-thread/posting-thread.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-thread/posting-thread.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/post/post.component.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/post-header/post-header.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (9 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/metis.module.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.html
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.scss
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/answer-post-footer/answer-post-footer.component.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/post-header/post-header.component.html
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/post-header/post-header.component.ts
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/post/post.component.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (25)
src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/answer-post.model.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/post.model.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.directive.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-thread/posting-thread.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-thread/posting-thread.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/post-header/post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🪛 Biome
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.ts
[error] 25-25: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.ts
[error] 66-66: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.ts
[error] 145-145: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 149-149: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts
[error] 26-26: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
[error] 29-31: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
[error] 64-64: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.ts
[error] 50-50: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.spec.ts
[error] 31-35: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts
[error] 167-167: Forbidden non-null assertion.
Unsafe fix: Replace with optional chain operator ?. This operator includes runtime checks, so it is safer than the compile-only non-null assertion operator
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (63)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-thread/posting-thread.component.html (1)
6-6: LGTM! The changes align with PR objectives and coding guidelines.The addition of the
[isConsecutive]input binding to the<jhi-post>component is well-implemented:
- It uses the correct property binding syntax.
- The logical OR operation (
isConsecutive || false) provides a sensible default value.- This change supports the PR objective of grouping messages based on timing.
Additionally, the use of
@ifinstead of*ngIfin the existing code aligns with the provided Angular syntax guidelines.src/main/webapp/app/entities/metis/post.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Overall structure and consistency look good.The file maintains a clean and consistent structure. The new
isConsecutiveproperty is well-integrated into the existingPostclass. The import statements, class extension, and constructor implementation all follow good practices and adhere to the coding guidelines.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.component.scss (1)
3-7: LGTM: New emoji container improves reaction layoutThe new
.emoji-containerclass effectively implements a flexbox layout for emoji reactions, aligning with the PR's objective to enhance the user interface. The centered alignment and small gap between items (0.2rem) will provide a clean, organized look for emoji reactions, improving the visual coherence of the chat interface.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (3)
16-18: LGTM! Verify padding for optimal spacing.The
.message-contentclass adds left padding to create space between the message content and its container, which improves readability and aligns with the PR objectives.Please verify if the 0.3rem left padding provides enough space for optimal readability. You might want to test with different message lengths to ensure consistent appearance.
44-46: LGTM! Enhances user interaction feedback.The
.clickableclass appropriately sets the cursor to a pointer, providing clear visual feedback for interactive elements. This aligns well with the PR objective of improving user interaction with messages.
Line range hint
1-57: Overall, excellent implementation with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes in this file effectively address the PR objectives by:
- Improving message grouping and visual coherence
- Implementing hover actions for messages
- Enhancing the overall UI and user interaction
The use of CSS variables, smooth transitions, and well-structured classes contributes to a maintainable and visually appealing design. The minor suggestions provided (adding box-shadow, verifying padding, improving accessibility, and using a CSS variable for icon size) can further enhance the implementation.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (2)
24-26: LGTM! Appropriate padding for message content.The
.message-contentclass with left padding helps improve the visual structure of the messages, aligning with the PR objectives.
52-54: LGTM! Good use of cursor property for clickable elements.The
.clickableclass improves user experience by visually indicating interactive elements.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.scss (3)
64-68: LGTM: Appropriate styling for message groupingThe
.message-groupclass effectively uses flexbox to create a column layout for grouped messages. The bottom margin of 10px provides good visual separation between message groups, which aligns with the PR objective of improving the visual coherence of conversations.
75-80: LGTM: Consistent spacing for grouped postsThe
.grouped-postsand.grouped-postclasses reset margins and padding to 0, which ensures consistent spacing within grouped messages. This change supports the PR objective of improving visual coherence in conversations by eliminating any unintended spacing between grouped messages.
63-84: Overall: Excellent improvements to message grouping and visual coherenceThe new SCSS classes and styles effectively support the PR objectives of enhancing the user experience in the Artemis chat application. The changes introduce:
- Proper grouping of messages with the
.message-groupclass.- Visual hierarchy for grouped posts using indentation.
- Consistent spacing within grouped messages.
- Subtle separation between posting threads.
These style changes will significantly improve the visual coherence of conversations, especially for messages from the same user sent within a one-hour timeframe. The code is clean, well-organized, and aligns perfectly with the stated goals of the pull request.
Great job on implementing these UI improvements!
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.html (3)
2-10: LGTM: Conditional rendering aligns with PR objectivesThe use of
@iffor conditional rendering ofjhi-answer-post-headeris correct and follows the new Angular syntax as per our coding guidelines. This change supports the PR objective of grouping messages from the same user within a one-hour timeframe by only rendering the header when!isConsecutiveis true.
51-51: LGTM: Updated modal component with new bindingsThe addition of the
(postingUpdated)output binding and[createEditAnswerPostContainerRef]input to thejhi-answer-post-create-edit-modalcomponent aligns with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary. These updates likely improve the component's functionality for editing posts.Could you please verify the purpose and usage of the new
[createEditAnswerPostContainerRef]input? Ensure it's being used correctly within the component and that it doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.
1-51: Overall: Excellent improvements, consider additional testingThe changes in this file significantly improve the structure and functionality of the answer post component, aligning well with the PR objectives. The consistent use of new Angular syntax (@if) and the implementation of hover actions for message interactions are particularly noteworthy.
To ensure the robustness of these changes, consider adding or updating integration tests to cover the following scenarios:
- Correct rendering of consecutive and non-consecutive messages
- Proper functioning of hover actions
- Emoji count display and interaction
- Modal behavior for editing posts
These tests will help validate that the new structure and conditional rendering work as expected across different use cases.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (3)
3-18: Improved structure for reaction buttonsThe new conditional rendering using
@ifdirective aligns with the latest Angular syntax guidelines. The introduction of theemoji-containerdiv improves the layout by grouping the emoji and its count together. This change enhances both the code structure and the visual presentation of reactions.
Line range hint
66-74: Well-implemented reply buttonThe implementation of the reply button is well-structured and follows good practices. The conditional rendering ensures the button is only displayed in appropriate contexts, and the use of translation for the button text supports internationalization. The use of the
@ifdirective aligns with the latest Angular syntax guidelines.
Line range hint
1-74: Excellent overall structure and consistencyThe entire file demonstrates excellent structure and consistency. The new changes have been seamlessly integrated with the existing code, maintaining a consistent style throughout. The use of
@ifand@fordirectives aligns with the latest Angular syntax guidelines and is applied consistently across the file. This approach enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.The logical organization of different sections (reactions, selector, edit/delete, reply) makes the template easy to understand and maintain. Great job on maintaining code quality while implementing new features!
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements are correctly added.The new import statements for
EventEmitterandPostingare necessary for the component's new functionality and follow the Angular style guide.Also applies to: 8-8
19-19: LGTM: New output property is correctly implemented.The
postingUpdatedoutput property is well-defined:
- It uses the
@Output()decorator correctly.- The
EventEmitter<Posting>type is appropriate for emitting Posting objects.- The property name follows the camelCase naming convention as per the coding guidelines.
- This addition enhances the component's ability to communicate updates to its parent components.
83-84: LGTM:updatePostingmethod is correctly updated.The changes in the
updatePostingmethod enhance its functionality:
- The
nextcallback now correctly accepts anupdatedPostparameter of typeAnswerPost.- The
postingUpdatedevent is emitted with theupdatedPost, allowing parent components to react to the update.- The code follows the Angular style guide and uses arrow functions as per the coding guidelines.
These changes effectively integrate with the new output property, improving the component's ability to communicate updates.
Line range hint
1-107: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The modifications to this component effectively implement the new functionality for emitting updated posting data:
- The new import statements are correctly added.
- The
postingUpdatedoutput property is well-defined and follows naming conventions.- The
updatePostingmethod is updated to use the new output property correctly.These changes align with the PR objectives of enhancing the user experience in the Artemis chat application. The code adheres to the provided coding guidelines, including the use of arrow functions, proper naming conventions, and following Angular best practices.
No issues or inconsistencies were found in the implementation. The changes improve the component's ability to communicate updates to parent components, which should contribute to a more responsive and interactive user interface.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.spec.ts (6)
3-3: LGTM: Improved imports for better mocking and element querying.The addition of ng-mocks imports aligns with our coding guidelines for mocking. The By import from @angular/platform-browser is a good practice for querying elements in tests. The new AnswerPostReactionsBarComponent import supports the added test case.
Also applies to: 6-6, 8-8
37-44: LGTM: Well-structured test for non-consecutive answer post header.This test case effectively verifies the presence of the answer post header when
isConsecutiveis false, which aligns with the PR objective of dynamically adjusting message spacing. The use ofdebugElement.querywithBy.cssis a good practice for element selection in tests.
46-53: LGTM: Comprehensive test for consecutive answer post header.This test case effectively verifies the absence of the answer post header when
isConsecutiveis true, complementing the previous test and aligning with the PR objective of message grouping. The test structure and assertions are well-implemented.
63-67: LGTM: Improved element querying in edit component test.The change to use
debugElement.querywithBy.cssinstead of a customgetElementfunction aligns with Angular testing best practices. This improvement enhances consistency across the test suite while still effectively verifying the presence of the edit component.
70-75: LGTM: New test case for answer post reactions bar.This new test case effectively verifies the presence of the answer post reactions bar, which aligns with the PR objective of adding new UI elements for message interactions. The test structure and assertion follow good practices, using
debugElement.querywithBy.cssfor element selection.
78-85: LGTM: Enhanced verification of posting content.The change to use
ngMocks.inputfor verifying the content input of the PostingContentComponent is an improvement. This approach directly checks the input binding, aligning with our coding guidelines for using the ng-mocks library. The test effectively ensures that the correct content is passed to the component.src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/post-header/post-header.component.spec.ts (2)
17-17: LGTM: Proper import of sample dataThe import of sample data from a helper file is a good practice. It keeps the test file clean and allows for reuse of sample data across multiple test files.
Line range hint
1-93: Verify impact of removed test cases on overall coverageWhile the remaining tests cover essential functionality of the PostHeaderComponent, several test cases related to edit and delete options based on user roles have been removed. This might impact the overall test coverage of the component.
Please run the following script to check the test coverage for the PostHeaderComponent and verify if the removal of these test cases has significantly impacted the coverage:
If the coverage has decreased significantly, consider adding new test cases to maintain adequate coverage.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.ts (3)
19-19: LGTM: Icon imports added for improved UI.The addition of
faPencilAltandfaTrashicons aligns with the PR objectives to enhance message actions UI. The import statement follows Angular style guidelines.
63-65: LGTM: Readonly icon properties added.The addition of readonly properties for icons (
faBullhorn,faPencilAlt,faTrash) follows best practices for immutability and uses the correct camelCase naming convention as per the coding guidelines.
Line range hint
19-66: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to
PostComponenteffectively support the PR objectives:
- New icon imports and properties (
faPencilAlt,faTrash) facilitate the implementation of side-by-side message actions.- The
isConsecutiveinput property enables the grouping of consecutive messages from the same user.These changes lay the groundwork for improving the visual coherence of conversations and enhancing the user interface for message interactions, as outlined in the PR summary.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 66-66: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (3)
21-21: LGTM: Import of sample data for testing.The addition of this import statement brings in necessary sample data for testing purposes, which is a good practice for maintaining clean and readable test code.
Line range hint
1-165: Good use of recommended assertion methods.The test suite follows the coding guidelines by using the recommended assertion methods such as
toBeNull(),toBeTruthy(), andtoHaveBeenCalledOnce(). This improves the readability and maintainability of the tests.
Line range hint
1-165: Verify the removal of edit and delete option tests.The AI summary mentions the removal of tests related to edit and delete options based on user roles. However, these removals are not visible in the provided code. Please verify if these tests were intentionally removed and if so, ensure that the functionality is still adequately tested elsewhere.
To check for the removed tests, you can run the following command:
If any tests were removed, please provide justification for their removal and ensure that the related functionality is still covered by other tests.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.spec.ts (7)
18-24: LGTM: New imports and interface look good.The new imports for
AnswerPostandUsermodels, as well as thePostGroupinterface, are well-defined and necessary for the new test cases. They improve type safety and code readability.
79-85: LGTM: Comprehensive test for input changes and change detection.This test case effectively verifies:
- The component's reaction to changes in the
sortedAnswerPostsinput.- The correct execution of the grouping logic.
- The triggering of change detection.
The use of
ngOnChangeswith a simulated change object is a good practice for testing input property changes.
87-96: LGTM: Good test for cleanup on component destruction.This test case effectively verifies that the
answerPostCreateEditModalcontainer is properly cleared when the component is destroyed. This is crucial for preventing memory leaks and ensuring proper cleanup.The use of a mock container with a spy on the
clearmethod is a good approach for testing this behavior.
98-103: LGTM: Good test for trackPostByFn method.This test case effectively verifies that the
trackPostByFnmethod returns the correct ID of the post. This is crucial for optimizing Angular's change detection in lists.The test is simple, clear, and covers the essential functionality of the method.
105-113: LGTM: Effective test for trackGroupByFn method.This test case successfully verifies that the
trackGroupByFnmethod returns the ID of the first post in the group. This is essential for optimizing Angular's change detection in nested lists.The test is well-structured, using a mock group with a realistic structure, and clearly demonstrates the expected behavior of the method.
115-124: LGTM: Good test for isLastPost method (true case).This test case effectively verifies that the
isLastPostmethod correctly identifies when a post is the last one in a group. This is crucial for applying correct styling or behavior to the last post in a group.The test is well-structured, using a mock group with multiple posts, and clearly demonstrates the expected behavior of the method for the true case.
126-135: LGTM: Comprehensive test for isLastPost method (false case).This test case effectively verifies that the
isLastPostmethod correctly identifies when a post is not the last one in a group. It complements the previous test case, ensuring full coverage of the method's behavior.The test is well-structured, using a mock group with multiple posts, and clearly demonstrates the expected behavior of the method for the false case.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.spec.ts (1)
22-22: LGTM: dayjs import added correctly.The dayjs library import is appropriately placed and necessary for date manipulation in the new test case.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.ts (1)
5-6: LGTM!The new imports for
PostingandReactionare appropriate and necessary for the added functionality.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-footer/post-footer/post-footer.component.html (3)
15-30: Ensure consistency in component input and output propertiesReview all the input properties and event bindings in the
<jhi-answer-post>component to ensure they align with the component's API. This includes properties like[lastReadDate],[isReadOnlyMode],[posting], and others.
22-22: Verify the implementation ofisLastPostfunctionEnsure that the
isLastPost(group, answerPost)function correctly identifies the last post in a group. Any misimplementation might lead to incorrect rendering or styling of the posts.Run the following script to check where
isLastPostis defined and how it's implemented:
25-28: Confirm event handlers are properly defined in<jhi-answer-post>Verify that the event emitters
(openPostingCreateEditModal),(userReferenceClicked), and(channelReferenceClicked)are correctly implemented in the<jhi-answer-post>component to ensure they function as expected.Run the following script to check the event emitters in the component:
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (4)
1-1: Updated class attributes for consistent stylingThe change from
mb-3tomb-1 message-containerin the<div>class adjusts the margin and adds a specific container class, which likely aligns with the new design requirements for message spacing and styling.
Line range hint
2-12: Conditional rendering of post header based onisConsecutiveIntroducing the
@if (!isConsecutive)condition to render<jhi-post-header>only when messages are not consecutive enhances the visual grouping of messages from the same user sent within a short timeframe, as per the PR objectives.
53-83: Verify potential duplication ofjhi-post-reactions-barcomponentThe
<jhi-post-reactions-bar>component is rendered within this block (lines 65-79) inside the message content. Please ensure that this inclusion doesn't conflict with the instance rendered later in the file (lines 98-107). If both are necessary due to different display contexts (e.g., hover actions vs. static display), consider adding comments to clarify their purposes.To confirm the necessity of both instances, review the rendering conditions and user interactions in the application.
106-107: Addition of[isEmojiCount]="true"enhances reactions bar functionalityIncluding the
[isEmojiCount]="true"input property to the<jhi-post-reactions-bar>component effectively adds an emoji add button next to existing reactions, aligning with modern chat application practices and improving user interaction.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.html (3)
77-79: Correct use of@fordirective for message groupingThe
@fordirective is correctly used to iterate overgroupedPosts, which aligns with the new Angular syntax as specified in the coding guidelines. Grouping messages enhances the visual coherence and structure of the conversation layout.
79-80: Proper nesting of message groups and postsThe nested
@forloop iterates overgroup.posts, and each post is encapsulated within a<div class="post-item">. This improves the semantic structure and styling of individual posts within each group, aiding in maintainability and readability.
81-93: Appropriate configuration of<jhi-posting-thread>componentThe
<jhi-posting-thread>component is properly configured with all the necessary inputs and event bindings. The addition of[isConsecutive]="post.isConsecutive || false"effectively supports the new feature for adjusting message spacing based on timing. All other inputs, such as[lastReadDate],[hasChannelModerationRights], and[readOnlyMode], are appropriately set, ensuring consistent behavior across different conversation states.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.ts (1)
59-61: Method 'isAnyReactionCountAboveZero' is well-implementedThe method correctly checks if any reaction count is above zero using an efficient approach.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.html (4)
Line range hint
35-47: Conditional rendering of discussion controls is correctly implementedThe added condition
!isEmojiCount && !isThreadSidebaraccurately controls the display of the "start discussion" and "expand answers" buttons, aligning with the intended functionality of the communication page.
61-76: Reaction buttons rendering updated appropriatelyThe refactored code correctly introduces a
divwith the classemoji-containeraround the emoji and count. This enhances the structure and styling of the reaction buttons, improving the user interface.
79-106: Addition of reaction selector is implemented correctlyThe new reaction selector button and the associated emoji picker are integrated properly. The use of
cdkOverlaycomponents is appropriate, and the conditional rendering based onisAnyReactionCountAboveZero()andisEmojiCountensures the selector appears under the right conditions.
108-140: Conditional rendering of edit, delete, and pin controls is correctly handledThe conditions
!isEmojiCount && mayEditOrDeleteand!isEmojiCount && (displayPriority === DisplayPriority.PINNED || canPin)are accurately used to render the edit, delete, and pin buttons appropriately based on the user's permissions and the component's state. The implementation aligns with best practices for conditional rendering in Angular templates.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/layout/conversation-messages/conversation-messages.component.ts (2)
35-40: Well-implemented 'DayjsToDatePipe' for date conversionThe
DayjsToDatePipeprovides a reusable and clean solution for convertingdayjs.Dayjsobjects toDateobjects in templates, promoting code reuse and aligning with Angular best practices.
183-227: Effective grouping of posts enhances user experienceThe
groupPostsmethod successfully groups posts by author and time interval, aligning with the PR objectives to adjust message spacing based on timing. This improves the visual coherence of conversations and enhances the user interface.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/posting-reactions-bar.directive.ts (2)
53-53: LGTMThe
reactionsUpdatedoutput property is correctly defined and follows the camelCase naming convention.
57-58: LGTMThe new properties
isAtLeastTutorInCourseandisAuthorOfPostingare appropriately declared and follow the camelCase naming convention.
| @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import { Posting } from 'app/entities/metis/posting.model'; | |||
| export class AnswerPost extends Posting { | |||
| public resolvesPost?: boolean; | |||
| public post?: Post; | |||
| public isConsecutive?: boolean = false; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.
The addition of the isConsecutive property aligns well with the PR objectives for enhancing message grouping. The implementation follows the coding guidelines, using camelCase for property naming.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the isConsecutive property for better code documentation. For example:
// Indicates whether this post is part of a consecutive message group
public isConsecutive?: boolean = false;| @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ export class PostingThreadComponent { | |||
| @Input() showChannelReference?: boolean; | |||
| @Input() hasChannelModerationRights = false; | |||
| @Output() openThread = new EventEmitter<Post>(); | |||
| @Input() isConsecutive: boolean | undefined = false; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider using non-null assertion for better type safety.
The addition of the isConsecutive input property aligns well with the PR objectives for enhancing message grouping. The implementation follows Angular best practices and our coding guidelines.
Consider using a non-null assertion operator to improve type safety:
- @Input() isConsecutive: boolean | undefined = false;
+ @Input() isConsecutive!: boolean;This change eliminates the need for the undefined type and the default value, as Angular will always provide a value for input properties. It also aligns better with the component's OnPush change detection strategy.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Input() isConsecutive: boolean | undefined = false; | |
| @Input() isConsecutive!: boolean; |
| @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ export class Post extends Posting { | |||
| public conversation?: Conversation; | |||
| public displayPriority?: DisplayPriority; | |||
| public resolved?: boolean; | |||
| public isConsecutive?: boolean = false; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider making the property non-optional for type safety.
The addition of the isConsecutive property aligns well with the PR objectives for enhancing message grouping. The naming and default value are appropriate.
For improved type safety, consider making the property non-optional:
public isConsecutive: boolean = false;This change would eliminate the need for null checks when using this property elsewhere in the codebase.
| background: var(--reaction-button-default-color); | ||
| color: var(--metis-gray); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Consistent color for reaction buttons
The addition of the color: var(--metis-gray); property to the .reaction-button class ensures consistent text color for reaction buttons. This change supports the PR's objective of maintaining consistency across themes.
For improved consistency, consider using semantic color variables. For example:
- color: var(--metis-gray);
+ color: var(--reaction-button-text-color, var(--metis-gray));This allows for more flexible theming while maintaining the current color as a fallback.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| color: var(--metis-gray); | |
| color: var(--reaction-button-text-color, var(--metis-gray)); |
| .message-container { | ||
| position: relative; | ||
| border-radius: 5px; | ||
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding box-shadow for depth.
The .message-container class is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The relative positioning and border-radius enhance the visual appeal, while the transition prepares for smooth hover effects.
To further improve the visual hierarchy, consider adding a subtle box-shadow:
.message-container {
position: relative;
border-radius: 5px;
transition: background-color 0.3s ease;
+ box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-container { | |
| position: relative; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease; | |
| } | |
| .message-container { | |
| position: relative; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease; | |
| box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); | |
| } |
| MockPipe(ReactingUsersOnPostingPipe), | ||
| MockComponent(FaIconComponent), | ||
| MockComponent(PostCreateEditModalComponent), | ||
| EmojiComponent, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider mocking EmojiComponent to improve test isolation
The EmojiComponent is declared directly in the test's declarations. If its internal implementation is not under test, consider mocking it using MockComponent(EmojiComponent) to improve test isolation and reduce test complexity.
Apply this diff to mock EmojiComponent:
- EmojiComponent,
+ MockComponent(EmojiComponent),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| EmojiComponent, | |
| MockComponent(EmojiComponent), |
|
|
||
| showReactionSelector = false; | ||
| currentUserIsAtLeastTutor: boolean; | ||
| isAtLeastTutorInCourse: boolean; | ||
| isAuthorOfPosting: boolean; | ||
| @Output() isModalOpen = new EventEmitter<void>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider renaming the output property for clarity
The output property isModalOpen suggests a boolean value rather than an event emitter. According to the Angular Style Guide, output event emitters should be named to represent events without the is prefix and in the past participle form. Consider renaming it to modalOpened or modalOpen to better reflect its purpose as an event.
| this.isAuthorOfPosting = this.metisService.metisUserIsAuthorOfPosting(this.posting); | ||
| this.isAtLeastTutorInCourse = this.metisService.metisUserIsAtLeastTutorInCourse(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid redundant properties and method calls
The properties currentUserIsAtLeastTutor and isAtLeastTutorInCourse both store the result of this.metisService.metisUserIsAtLeastTutorInCourse(). Assigning the same value to two properties is redundant and may cause confusion. Consider using a single property throughout the class to represent this state.
To resolve this, you can remove one of the properties and update references accordingly.
| this.posting.reactions = this.posting.reactions?.filter((reaction) => reaction.id !== reactionToDelete.id); | ||
| this.updatePostingWithReactions(); | ||
| this.showReactionSelector = false; | ||
| this.reactionsUpdated.emit(this.posting.reactions); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to eliminate code duplication in addOrRemoveReaction
The lines this.updatePostingWithReactions();, this.showReactionSelector = false;, and this.reactionsUpdated.emit(this.posting.reactions); are repeated in both the deleteReaction and createReaction subscription callbacks. To improve code maintainability and readability, consider extracting these lines into a separate method and invoking it in both callbacks.
Here's how you can refactor the code:
addOrRemoveReaction(emojiId: string): void {
const existingReactionIdx = /* existing code */;
if (this.posting.reactions && existingReactionIdx > -1) {
const reactionToDelete = this.posting.reactions[existingReactionIdx];
this.metisService.deleteReaction(reactionToDelete).subscribe(() => {
this.posting.reactions = this.posting.reactions?.filter((reaction) => reaction.id !== reactionToDelete.id);
+ this.handleReactionUpdate();
});
} else {
const reactionToCreate = this.buildReaction(emojiId);
this.metisService.createReaction(reactionToCreate).subscribe(() => {
+ this.handleReactionUpdate();
});
}
}
+private handleReactionUpdate(): void {
+ this.updatePostingWithReactions();
+ this.showReactionSelector = false;
+ this.reactionsUpdated.emit(this.posting.reactions);
+}Also applies to: 174-176
| deletePosting(): void { | ||
| this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Subscribe to the observable returned by deletePost
The call to this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting); does not subscribe to the observable returned by deletePost. As a result, the delete operation will not be executed. In Angular, observables need to be subscribed to in order to perform the operation. Please add a subscription to handle the response and potential errors.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
deletePosting(): void {
- this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting);
+ this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting).subscribe(() => {
+ // Handle successful deletion, e.g., navigate away or update UI
+ }, (error) => {
+ // Handle error scenario
+ });
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| deletePosting(): void { | |
| this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting); | |
| deletePosting(): void { | |
| this.metisService.deletePost(this.posting).subscribe(() => { | |
| // Handle successful deletion, e.g., navigate away or update UI | |
| }, (error) => { | |
| // Handle error scenario | |
| }); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal/answer-post-create-edit-modal.component.ts (4)
1-1: Import statement includes necessary modules.The addition of
Outputin the import statement is appropriate for using the@Output()decorator.
8-8: Importing 'Posting' model is appropriate.The
Postingmodel is required for typing theEventEmitter<Posting>.
19-19: Output property 'postingUpdated' added correctly.The
@Output()postingUpdatedemitter is properly declared and will allow parent components to react to posting updates.
84-85: Correctly handling the updated answer post.The
nextcallback now accepts theupdatedPostas a parameter and emits it usingpostingUpdated, which is appropriate.
| @@ -46,6 +48,7 @@ export class AnswerPostCreateEditModalComponent extends PostingCreateEditModalDi | |||
| * resets the answer post content | |||
| */ | |||
| resetFormGroup(): void { | |||
| this.posting = this.posting || { content: '' }; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'this.posting' is fully initialized.
Assigning { content: '' } to this.posting may not include all required properties of an AnswerPost. Consider initializing this.posting as a new AnswerPost instance to ensure type safety.
Apply this diff to initialize this.posting properly:
-this.posting = this.posting || { content: '' };
+this.posting = this.posting || new AnswerPost();
+this.posting.content = this.posting.content || '';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.posting = this.posting || { content: '' }; | |
| this.posting = this.posting || new AnswerPost(); | |
| this.posting.content = this.posting.content || ''; |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes to the messaging and posting components within the application. Key modifications include the addition of a new property Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
asliayk
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test5.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested on TS5, generally it works but I noticed two things:
- In a thread, the button for "message resolves thread" (the tick) is only available for the first of consecutive messages. We probably should have this option available for all messages, like editing and deleting.
- I noticed that the options bar on regular messages often overlaps the message itself. Is this intentional? Considering that there is quite a bit of room in between the messages, we could probably position the menu in a way that doesn't overlap the content
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (4 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (3)
16-18: LGTM! Appropriate spacing for message content.The
.message-contentclass with left padding enhances the visual hierarchy of the messages, aligning well with the PR objectives for improving message display.
24-37: LGTM! Well-implemented hover actions.The
.hover-actionsclass is expertly crafted with absolute positioning and smooth transition effects. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives for redesigning message action buttons. The use of CSS variables for colors and backgrounds ensures consistency with the overall theme.
10-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Consider adding box-shadow for depth.
The
.message-containerclass is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The relative positioning, border-radius, and transition enhance the visual appeal and prepare for smooth hover effects.To further improve the visual hierarchy, consider adding a subtle
box-shadowas suggested in the previous review:.message-container { position: relative; border-radius: 5px; transition: background-color 0.3s ease; + box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (2)
24-26: LGTM! Appropriate padding for message content.The
.message-contentclass with left padding is a good addition. It helps to visually separate the message content from the container edge, improving readability and aligning with the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-59: Overall, excellent implementation with room for minor enhancements.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of refactoring the consecutive message view and enhancing the user experience. The new classes and their properties effectively implement the desired styling and interactions for the messaging component.
The suggested enhancements, including improving transition effects, keyboard accessibility, and consistent use of CSS variables, will further refine the implementation. These minor adjustments will contribute to a more polished and accessible user interface.
Great job on the implementation! The code is clean, well-structured, and achieves the intended goals.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (3)
Line range hint
1-12: Conditional Rendering of Post Header Based on Message ContinuityThe
jhi-post-headercomponent is now conditionally rendered when!isConsecutive, effectively hiding the header for consecutive messages from the same user. This aligns with the PR objectives to group messages and enhances the chat interface by reducing redundancy.
53-83: Appropriate Structuring of Message Content and ReactionsThe message content is now enclosed within a new
<div>with[ngClass]="{ 'mx-0': !isThreadSidebar }", which ensures proper styling based on the thread sidebar state. Thejhi-posting-contentcomponent is correctly configured with all necessary inputs and outputs.The conditional rendering of the
jhi-post-reactions-barwithin the message content when!previewModeis appropriate, as it prevents reactions from being displayed in preview mode, maintaining a clean and focused interface.
98-107: Duplicate Instance ofjhi-post-reactions-barComponentThe previous review comment regarding the necessity of multiple instances of
jhi-post-reactions-baris still applicable to this code segment. Please confirm that having multiple instances is intentional and that they serve distinct purposes based on the component state. Ensure that conditions are explicitly handled to prevent unintended duplication.
| .message-container:hover { | ||
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding keyboard focus styles for accessibility.
The hover effect for .message-container is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. To improve accessibility, consider adding styles for keyboard focus as suggested in the previous review:
-.message-container:hover {
+.message-container:hover,
+.message-container:focus-within {
background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background);
}This ensures that keyboard users can also access the hover state.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-container:hover { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } | |
| .message-container:hover, | |
| .message-container:focus-within { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } |
| .clickable { | ||
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .hover-actions .clickable:hover { | ||
| color: var(--bs-white); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider using a CSS variable for icon size.
The .clickable class and its hover effect are well-implemented, providing clear visual feedback for interactive elements. To improve maintainability, consider using a CSS variable for the icon size as suggested in a previous review:
+:root {
+ --metis-icon-size: 1rem;
+}
.reactionIcon,
.editIcon,
.deleteIcon {
- font-size: 1rem;
+ font-size: var(--metis-icon-size);
color: var(--metis-blue);
}This makes it easier to adjust the icon size globally if needed.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| .message-container { | ||
| position: relative; | ||
| border-radius: 5px; | ||
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider enhancing the transition effect.
The .message-container class is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. To further improve the smooth transition effect, consider adding border-radius to the transition property:
.message-container {
position: relative;
border-radius: 5px;
- transition: background-color 0.3s ease;
+ transition: background-color 0.3s ease, border-radius 0.3s ease;
}This change will ensure a smoother transition if the border-radius changes on different states (e.g., hover).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-container { | |
| position: relative; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease; | |
| } | |
| .message-container { | |
| position: relative; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| transition: background-color 0.3s ease, border-radius 0.3s ease; | |
| } |
| .clickable { | ||
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /* Optional: Additional styling for icons on hover */ | ||
| .hover-actions .clickable:hover { | ||
| color: var(--bs-white); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider using a CSS variable for hover color.
The .clickable class and its hover effect are well-implemented, providing consistent styling and visual feedback for user interactions. This aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the message action buttons.
For better consistency and easier theme management, consider using a CSS variable for the hover color:
/* Optional: Additional styling for icons on hover */
.hover-actions .clickable:hover {
- color: var(--bs-white);
+ color: var(--metis-icon-hover-color, var(--bs-white));
}This change allows for easier customization across different themes and maintains consistency with the use of CSS variables in other parts of the application.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .clickable { | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| } | |
| /* Optional: Additional styling for icons on hover */ | |
| .hover-actions .clickable:hover { | |
| color: var(--bs-white); | |
| } | |
| .clickable { | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| } | |
| /* Optional: Additional styling for icons on hover */ | |
| .hover-actions .clickable:hover { | |
| color: var(--metis-icon-hover-color, var(--bs-white)); | |
| } |
edkaya
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test4.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Unused Mocks and Incomplete Test Coverage Identified
After running the verification scripts:
Unused Mocks:
- Several mock services are imported but not utilized in the tests. Consider removing the following imports to clean up the test suite:
MockMetisServiceMockNgbModalServiceMockAccountServiceMissing Test Cases:
- The current test suite does not include tests for edit and delete functionalities based on user roles. To ensure comprehensive coverage, please add test cases that verify:
- Edit options are available/enabled only for authorized user roles.
- Delete options are available/enabled only for authorized user roles.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-124: Consider enhancing test coverage and removing unused setup.Based on the AI summary and the current state of the test suite:
Test coverage gaps: The removal of tests for edit and delete options based on user roles might leave important functionality untested. Consider adding back these tests or ensuring that this functionality is covered elsewhere.
Unused setup: The test suite still includes setup for user role checks (metisServiceUserIsAtLeastTutorMock, metisServiceUserPostingAuthorMock) that may no longer be necessary. Consider removing this setup if it's not used in the remaining tests.
Comprehensive testing: Ensure that the remaining tests provide adequate coverage of the component's functionality. Consider adding tests for any untested features or edge cases.
To help identify potential gaps in test coverage, you can run the following command to check for unused mocks and potentially missing test cases:
This script will help identify any unused mocks and list the current test cases, allowing you to assess if any important scenarios are missing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify unused mocks and potential missing test cases # Check for unused mocks echo "Checking for unused mocks:" grep -n "mock" src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts | grep -v "expect" # Check for potentially missing test cases echo "Checking for potentially missing test cases:" grep -n "it(" src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.tsLength of output: 1513
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (4 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🪛 Biome
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.ts
[error] 27-27: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
[error] 30-32: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
[error] 65-65: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.spec.ts
[error] 173-173: Forbidden non-null assertion.
Unsafe fix: Replace with optional chain operator ?. This operator includes runtime checks, so it is safer than the compile-only non-null assertion operator
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (4)
10-14: LGTM! Consider adding box-shadow for depth.The
.message-containerclass is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The relative positioning, border-radius, and transition properties enhance the visual appeal and prepare for smooth hover effects.As suggested in a previous review, consider adding a subtle
box-shadowto further improve the visual hierarchy:.message-container { position: relative; border-radius: 5px; transition: background-color 0.3s ease; + box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }
16-22: LGTM! Well-implemented message content styling.The
.message-contentclass is well-designed:
- The left padding improves readability and allows space for potential avatars or indentation.
- The hover effect provides clear visual feedback, enhancing user interaction.
- The use of CSS variables (
var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background)) ensures consistency with the overall theme.These styles align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the chat interface.
24-42: LGTM! Consider adding keyboard focus styles for accessibility.The
.hover-actionsclass and its associated hover rule are well-implemented:
- Absolute positioning places the actions above the message as intended.
- Flex display ensures proper spacing between action buttons.
- Smooth transitions create an elegant appearance/disappearance effect.
- The background and border-radius properties make the actions visually distinct.
These styles align well with the PR objectives of redesigning message action buttons.
As suggested in a previous review, consider adding styles for keyboard focus to improve accessibility:
-.message-container:hover .hover-actions { +.message-container:hover .hover-actions, +.message-container:focus-within .hover-actions { opacity: 1; visibility: visible; }This ensures that keyboard users can also access the hover actions.
44-46: LGTM! Clear indication of interactive elements.The
.clickableclass is a simple but effective addition:
- It provides a clear visual cue that an element is interactive by changing the cursor to a pointing hand.
- This enhancement improves the overall usability of the chat interface, aligning with the PR objectives.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (3)
24-30: LGTM! Well-implemented message content styling.The
.message-contentclass is correctly implemented with appropriate left padding and a hover effect. The use of a CSS variable for the hover background color (var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background)) ensures consistency with the overall theme and allows for easy customization. This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the chat interface.
52-54: LGTM! Simple and effective implementation.The
.clickableclass is correctly implemented, setting the cursor to pointer for interactive elements. This simple addition enhances the user experience by providing visual feedback for clickable items, aligning well with the PR objectives of improving the chat interface usability.
18-22: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Consider enhancing the transition effect.
The
.message-containerclass is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. To further improve the smooth transition effect, consider addingborder-radiusto the transition property:.message-container { position: relative; border-radius: 5px; - transition: background-color 0.3s ease; + transition: background-color 0.3s ease, border-radius 0.3s ease; }This change will ensure a smoother transition if the border-radius changes on different states (e.g., hover).
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.html (4)
1-1: Use of dynamic margin class is appropriateThe addition of
[ngClass]="{ 'mx-0': !isThreadSidebar }"correctly adjusts the margin based on theisThreadSidebarproperty, enhancing the component's responsiveness.
Line range hint
2-12: Proper implementation of conditional header display using @ifThe use of
@if (!isConsecutive)aligns with the new Angular syntax guidelines, ensuring that the<jhi-post-header>component is displayed only when the message is not consecutive. This meets the PR's objective of grouping messages from the same user.
53-64: Efficient structuring of message content with appropriate bindingsThe introduction of the
message-containerandmessage-contentdivs wraps the<jhi-posting-content>component effectively. The use of@if (!displayInlineInput)ensures that the message content is hidden when inline editing is active.
107-107: Verify the usage of[isEmojiCount]input propertyThe property
[isEmojiCount]="true"is being passed to<jhi-post-reactions-bar>. Please confirm that thejhi-post-reactions-barcomponent acceptsisEmojiCountas an@Inputproperty.Run the following script to verify:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
[isEmojiCount]is a valid@Inputproperty in thejhi-post-reactions-barcomponent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if 'isEmojiCount' is an @Input property in jhi-post-reactions-bar component. # Expected result: The '@Input() isEmojiCount' decorator should be present in the component's TypeScript file. fd -a -I -t f 'post-reactions-bar.component.ts' | xargs rg '@Input\(\)\s+isEmojiCount'Length of output: 438
| .hover-actions { | ||
| position: absolute; | ||
| top: -1.8rem; | ||
| right: 1%; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| gap: 10px; | ||
| visibility: hidden; | ||
| transition: | ||
| opacity 0.2s ease-in-out, | ||
| visibility 0.2s ease-in-out; | ||
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-background); | ||
| padding: 5px; | ||
| border-radius: 5px; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions { | ||
| opacity: 1; | ||
| visibility: visible; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider improving keyboard accessibility.
The .hover-actions class and its related hover effect are well-implemented, providing a smooth appearance of action buttons on hover. This aligns with the PR objectives of redesigning message action buttons.
To improve accessibility for keyboard users, consider adding a focus state:
.message-container:hover .hover-actions,
+.message-container:focus-within .hover-actions {
opacity: 1;
visibility: visible;
}This change ensures that the action buttons are also visible when navigating through the messages using a keyboard, enhancing the overall accessibility of the chat interface.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .hover-actions { | |
| position: absolute; | |
| top: -1.8rem; | |
| right: 1%; | |
| display: flex; | |
| gap: 10px; | |
| visibility: hidden; | |
| transition: | |
| opacity 0.2s ease-in-out, | |
| visibility 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-background); | |
| padding: 5px; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| } | |
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions { | |
| opacity: 1; | |
| visibility: visible; | |
| } | |
| .hover-actions { | |
| position: absolute; | |
| top: -1.8rem; | |
| right: 1%; | |
| display: flex; | |
| gap: 10px; | |
| visibility: hidden; | |
| transition: | |
| opacity 0.2s ease-in-out, | |
| visibility 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-background); | |
| padding: 5px; | |
| border-radius: 5px; | |
| } | |
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions, | |
| .message-container:focus-within .hover-actions { | |
| opacity: 1; | |
| visibility: visible; | |
| } |
| @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ import { FaIconComponent } from '@fortawesome/angular-fontawesome'; | |||
| import { ConfirmIconComponent } from 'app/shared/confirm-icon/confirm-icon.component'; | |||
| import { PostingMarkdownEditorComponent } from 'app/shared/metis/posting-markdown-editor/posting-markdown-editor.component'; | |||
| import { PostingButtonComponent } from 'app/shared/metis/posting-button/posting-button.component'; | |||
| import { metisAnswerPostUser2, metisPostInChannel, metisResolvingAnswerPostUser1, metisUser1 } from '../../../../../helpers/sample/metis-sample-data'; | |||
| import { UserRole } from 'app/shared/metis/metis.util'; | |||
| import { metisAnswerPostUser2, metisResolvingAnswerPostUser1, metisUser1 } from '../../../../../helpers/sample/metis-sample-data'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider optimizing imports.
The addition of specific sample data imports (metisAnswerPostUser2, metisResolvingAnswerPostUser1, metisUser1) aligns well with the focus on testing resolved states of posts. However, if user role tests have been removed as indicated in the AI summary, the metisUser1 import might be unnecessary.
Consider removing the metisUser1 import if it's no longer used in the test suite to keep the imports clean and relevant.
| deletePosting(): void { | ||
| this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Subscribe to the delete operation to ensure execution
In the deletePosting method, the call to this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting); might return an observable. Without subscribing to it, the delete operation may not execute. Please subscribe to the observable and handle success and error cases appropriately.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
deletePosting(): void {
- this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting);
+ this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting).subscribe(
+ () => {
+ // Handle success
+ },
+ (error) => {
+ // Handle error
+ }
+ );
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| deletePosting(): void { | |
| this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting); | |
| } | |
| deletePosting(): void { | |
| this.metisService.deleteAnswerPost(this.posting).subscribe( | |
| () => { | |
| // Handle success | |
| }, | |
| (error) => { | |
| // Handle error | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| } |
| toggleResolvesPost(): void { | ||
| if (this.isAtLeastTutorInCourse || this.isAuthorOfOriginalPost) { | ||
| this.posting.resolvesPost = !this.posting.resolvesPost; | ||
| this.metisService.updateAnswerPost(this.posting).subscribe(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Handle errors when updating the answer post
In the toggleResolvesPost method, the subscription to this.metisService.updateAnswerPost(this.posting) lacks error handling. It's recommended to handle errors to improve reliability and facilitate debugging.
Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
toggleResolvesPost(): void {
if (this.isAtLeastTutorInCourse || this.isAuthorOfOriginalPost) {
this.posting.resolvesPost = !this.posting.resolvesPost;
- this.metisService.updateAnswerPost(this.posting).subscribe();
+ this.metisService.updateAnswerPost(this.posting).subscribe(
+ () => {
+ // Handle success
+ },
+ (error) => {
+ // Handle error
+ }
+ );
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| > | ||
| <fa-icon [icon]="farSmile" [class.open-selector]="showReactionSelector" [title]="'artemisApp.metis.chooseReaction' | artemisTranslate"></fa-icon> | ||
| </button> | ||
| @if (!isReadOnlyMode) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Redundant Conditional Check for isReadOnlyMode
The condition @if (!isReadOnlyMode) at line 32 is nested within a <div> that is already controlled by [hidden]="isReadOnlyMode" at line 20. This additional check is redundant and can be removed to simplify the template and improve readability.
| @if (!isAnswerOfAnnouncement) { | ||
| <button | ||
| class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small resolve" | ||
| id="toggleElement" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Avoid Using Generic id Attributes to Prevent Potential Conflicts
The id="toggleElement" assigned to the button at line 55 is very generic and may lead to HTML id attribute conflicts if used elsewhere in the application. Consider removing the id if it's not needed, or use a more specific and unique identifier.
| expect(getDeleteButton()).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(getDeleteButton()).not.toBeNull(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove Redundant 'toBeDefined' Check
The assertion expect(getDeleteButton()).toBeDefined(); is redundant because getDeleteButton() returns either a DebugElement or null. Checking expect(getDeleteButton()).not.toBeNull(); is sufficient to ensure the element exists.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant assertion:
- expect(getDeleteButton()).toBeDefined();
expect(getDeleteButton()).not.toBeNull();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| expect(getDeleteButton()).toBeDefined(); | |
| expect(getDeleteButton()).not.toBeNull(); | |
| expect(getDeleteButton()).not.toBeNull(); |
| const previousState = component.posting.resolvesPost; | ||
| component.toggleResolvesPost(); | ||
| expect(component.posting.resolvesPost).toEqual(!previousState); | ||
| expect(metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance Spy Call Assertion for Specific Arguments
Currently, the test verifies that metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock was called once. To make the test more precise, assert that it was called with the expected component.posting object.
Apply this diff to enhance the assertion:
- expect(metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
+ expect(metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(component.posting);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| expect(metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); | |
| expect(metisServiceUpdateAnswerPostMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(component.posting); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested on ts4, consecutive messages are grouped together 👍 However, I found some minor issues regarding the layout.
- I think elements in post reaction bar are not aligned correctly, reply button seems a little bit off to me. Can you add
align-items-centerin the first line of this component? Besides, when hovering on the message, the white background of the reaction bar disrupts the layout there. I think we can provide some border or something similar (see screenshot). We can also display them in the message bar when we hover on the message instead of letting them pop out at top.
- Secondy, when I send another message 4-5 min after the consecutive messages, the new message (Test Message 16.40) is still displayed/grouped with older messages. I think it should not be grouped with old messages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar/answer-post-reactions-bar.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.html (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/answer-post/answer-post.component.scss (5)
16-18: LGTM! Appropriate padding for message content.The
.message-contentclass with its left padding of 0.3rem provides a suitable visual separation for the message content, aligning well with the PR objectives of enhancing the chat interface.
24-38: LGTM! Well-implemented hover actions.The
.hover-actionsclass is excellently implemented. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives by providing a smooth and visually appealing way to display message action buttons. The use of CSS variables for colors, the carefully crafted transitions, and the thoughtful positioning all contribute to a polished user experience.
45-47: LGTM! Clear indication of interactive elements.The
.clickableclass is a simple yet effective way to indicate interactive elements. It aligns well with the PR objectives by enhancing the usability of the chat interface.
Line range hint
1-47: Overall, excellent implementation with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the chat interface. The new classes and styles effectively implement the grouping of consecutive messages and the redesign of message action buttons. The use of CSS variables ensures consistency with the overall theme.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve accessibility and visual depth. Consider implementing these suggestions to make the interface even more robust and user-friendly.
10-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Consider adding box-shadow for depth.
The
.message-containerclass is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The relative positioning and border-radius enhance the visual appeal, while the transition prepares for smooth hover effects.To further improve the visual hierarchy, consider adding a subtle
box-shadowas suggested in the previous review:.message-container { position: relative; border-radius: 5px; transition: background-color 0.3s ease; + box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/post/post.component.scss (3)
18-22: LGTM! The.message-containerclass is well-implemented.The
.message-containerclass properties align well with the PR objectives for grouping consecutive messages. The relative positioning and border-radius contribute to the desired visual grouping effect.
53-55: LGTM! The.clickableclass is appropriately implemented.The
.clickableclass effectively indicates interactive elements by setting the cursor style. This simple implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing user interaction in the chat interface.
32-51: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Consider using CSS variables for consistent spacing.
The
.hover-actionsclass is well-implemented, aligning with the PR objectives for redesigning message action buttons. The use of CSS variables for colors is good for maintainability.For better consistency and easier maintenance, consider using CSS variables for spacing values:
.hover-actions { position: absolute; - top: -1.8rem; - right: 1%; + top: var(--hover-actions-top, -1.8rem); + right: var(--hover-actions-right, 1%); display: flex; - gap: 10px; + gap: var(--hover-actions-gap, 10px); /* ... other properties ... */ - padding: 5px; + padding: var(--hover-actions-padding, 5px); border-radius: 5px; border: 0.01rem solid var(--metis-gray); }This change allows for easier customization and maintains consistency with the use of CSS variables in other parts of the application.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar/post-reactions-bar.component.html (5)
1-1: Component container initialized correctlyThe outer
<div>is appropriately set up with the necessary classes to ensure proper layout and styling of the reaction bar.
Line range hint
35-51: Conditional rendering for conversation actionsThe addition of the conditional blocks correctly handles the display of 'start discussion' and 'expand answers' buttons based on the
isEmojiCountandisThreadSidebarflags. The logic aligns with the intended user experience on the communication page.
61-76: Proper rendering of emoji reactionsThe implementation for displaying emoji reactions when
isEmojiCountis true is correct. The use ofreactionMetaDataensures dynamic rendering, and the interaction handlers are appropriately set up.
108-116: Edit functionality is implemented correctlyThe edit button is conditionally rendered based on the
isEmojiCountandmayEditOrDeleteflags. The click event handler appropriately opens the edit modal, and tooltips provide a good user experience.
118-139: Delete and pin actions are handled properlyThe delete button uses
jhi-confirm-iconto confirm the deletion action, enhancing safety. The pin functionality correctly checks permissions and updates the UI accordingly. The use of@ifensures these elements are only rendered when appropriate.
| .message-content:hover { | ||
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding keyboard focus styles for accessibility.
The hover effect for .message-content is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. To improve accessibility, consider adding styles for keyboard focus:
-.message-content:hover {
+.message-content:hover,
+.message-content:focus-within {
background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background);
}This ensures that keyboard users can also access the hover state.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-content:hover { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } | |
| .message-content:hover, | |
| .message-content:focus-within { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } |
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions { | ||
| opacity: 1; | ||
| visibility: visible; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding keyboard focus styles for accessibility.
The implementation for showing hover actions when the message container is hovered over is well done. To improve accessibility, consider adding styles for keyboard focus:
-.message-container:hover .hover-actions {
+.message-container:hover .hover-actions,
+.message-container:focus-within .hover-actions {
opacity: 1;
visibility: visible;
}This ensures that keyboard users can also access the hover actions.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions { | |
| opacity: 1; | |
| visibility: visible; | |
| } | |
| .message-container:hover .hover-actions, | |
| .message-container:focus-within .hover-actions { | |
| opacity: 1; | |
| visibility: visible; | |
| } |
| .message-content { | ||
| padding-left: 0.3rem; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .message-content:hover { | ||
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a transition for smoother hover effect.
The .message-content class is well-implemented, providing visual separation and a hover effect that aligns with the PR objectives. The use of a CSS variable for the hover background color is a good practice for maintainability.
To enhance the user experience further, consider adding a transition for the hover effect:
.message-content {
padding-left: 0.3rem;
+ transition: background-color 0.2s ease;
}This will create a smoother transition when hovering over the message content.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .message-content { | |
| padding-left: 0.3rem; | |
| } | |
| .message-content:hover { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } | |
| .message-content { | |
| padding-left: 0.3rem; | |
| transition: background-color 0.2s ease; | |
| } | |
| .message-content:hover { | |
| background: var(--metis-selection-option-hover-background); | |
| } |
| <button class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small delete"> | ||
| <jhi-confirm-icon | ||
| iconSize="sm" | ||
| (confirmEvent)="deletePosting()" | ||
| [initialTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.deleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | ||
| [confirmTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.confirmDeleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | ||
| /> | ||
| </button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid nesting buttons to maintain valid HTML structure
The <jhi-confirm-icon> component is wrapped inside a <button> element. If <jhi-confirm-icon> renders a <button> internally, nesting buttons is invalid HTML and can cause accessibility issues.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-<button class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small delete">
- <jhi-confirm-icon
- iconSize="sm"
- (confirmEvent)="deletePosting()"
- [initialTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.deleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate"
- [confirmTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.confirmDeleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate"
- />
-</button>
+<jhi-confirm-icon
+ iconSize="sm"
+ class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small delete"
+ (confirmEvent)="deletePosting()"
+ [initialTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.deleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate"
+ [confirmTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.confirmDeleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate"
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <button class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small delete"> | |
| <jhi-confirm-icon | |
| iconSize="sm" | |
| (confirmEvent)="deletePosting()" | |
| [initialTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.deleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | |
| [confirmTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.confirmDeleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | |
| /> | |
| </button> | |
| <jhi-confirm-icon | |
| iconSize="sm" | |
| class="reaction-button clickable px-2 fs-small delete" | |
| (confirmEvent)="deletePosting()" | |
| [initialTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.deleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | |
| [confirmTooltip]="'artemisApp.metis.confirmDeleteAnswer' | artemisTranslate" | |
| /> |
| [icon]="farSmile" | ||
| class="reaction-button react text-secondary clickable" | ||
| [class.open-selector]="showReactionSelector" | ||
| <ng-container *ngIf="(isAnyReactionCountAboveZero() && isEmojiCount) || !isEmojiCount"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace *ngIf with @if as per coding guidelines
According to the coding guidelines for files matching src/main/webapp/**/*.html, @if should be used instead of *ngIf. Please update the conditional directive to comply with the guidelines.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-<ng-container *ngIf="(isAnyReactionCountAboveZero() && isEmojiCount) || !isEmojiCount">
+@if ((isAnyReactionCountAboveZero() && isEmojiCount) || !isEmojiCount) {
+ <ng-container>Ensure that you adjust the closing tags accordingly.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| (backdropClick)="toggleEmojiSelect()" | ||
| > | ||
| <jhi-emoji-picker | ||
| *ngIf="!readOnlyMode" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace *ngIf with @if as per coding guidelines
As per the coding guidelines, @if should be used over *ngIf in this HTML file. Please update the directive on line 99.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-*ngIf="!readOnlyMode"
+@if (!readOnlyMode) {Remember to close the @if block appropriately in your template.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
The iOS app currently has a timeout of 5 minutes. On Slack it’s also something similar (definitely under 10 minutes, so probably also 5), so for consistency I think 5 min makes sense :) |
sachmii
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
az108
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test4.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested on TS3 and TS4, emojis, deleting and updating works as described. Also the messages are grouped together. Yet when I pin the message, it won't appear as pinned:
Also, the "Show 1 reply" doesn't appear below the message and I think it would be better if it did appear there so you won't have to hover over each message to know which one is in a thread and which one not.
HawKhiem
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tested on test server 3. Delete, edit, comments and react worked as expected. The messages are also group as expected. The pin function doens't seem to work. I would also recommend to put the options bar closer or even better, when right click on a message, a pop up would appear and allow users to choose weather to comment, edit or react, similar to that in slack for example. The current options bar are a bit to far and pose to be a nuance when one wants to move the mouse there to choose to comment
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
Most chat applications group messages from the same user within short time intervals for a more intuitive and user-friendly experience. In Artemis, messages have the same spacing regardless of whether they're seconds or days apart, making the interface less engaging. This update aims to adjust message spacing dynamically to enhance the chat experience.
Description
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Performance Review
Code Review
Manual Tests
Exam Mode Test
Performance Tests
Test Coverage
Screenshots
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isConsecutiveproperty forAnswerPostandPostclasses.isConsecutiveproperty.Bug Fixes
isConsecutiveproperty across various components.Style
Tests