Skip to content

Communication: Allow tutors to propose FAQ #53926

Communication: Allow tutors to propose FAQ

Communication: Allow tutors to propose FAQ #53926

GitHub Actions / Junit Results failed Oct 17, 2024 in 0s

Junit Results

Junit Results ran 8237 in 1116.6589999999999 seconds 0 Errored, 2 Failed, 2 Skipped

Annotations

Check failure on line 0 in test

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

test#L0

Junit Results ran 8237 in 1116.6589999999999 seconds 0 Errored, 2 Failed, 2 Skipped

Check failure on line 409 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/modeling/ModelingExerciseIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

testDeleteModelingExerciseWithCompetency()

Junit test testDeleteModelingExerciseWithCompetency() failed Wanted but not invoked:
competencyProgressService.updateProgressByCompetencyAsync(
    de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.atlas.domain.competency.Competency@34
);
-> at de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.atlas.service.competency.CompetencyProgressService.updateProgressByCompetencyAsync(CompetencyProgressService.java:123)
Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
Raw output
Wanted but not invoked:
competencyProgressService.updateProgressByCompetencyAsync(
    de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.atlas.domain.competency.Competency@34
);
-> at de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.atlas.service.competency.CompetencyProgressService.updateProgressByCompetencyAsync(CompetencyProgressService.java:123)
Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.

	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.atlas.service.competency.CompetencyProgressService.updateProgressByCompetencyAsync(CompetencyProgressService.java:123)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.modeling.ModelingExerciseIntegrationTest.testDeleteModelingExerciseWithCompetency(ModelingExerciseIntegrationTest.java:415)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:194)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)

Check failure on line 120 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack()

Junit test testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack() failed org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 1L
 but was: 2L
Raw output
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 1L
 but was: 2L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.clientConnectToArtemisSshServer(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:188)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:121)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:194)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)