Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-43418: Divide AP pipeline into preload and prompt subsets #191

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

kfindeisen
Copy link
Member

@kfindeisen kfindeisen commented Aug 19, 2024

This PR splits the pipeline files into separate pipelines, corresponding to the prompt and preload subsets from lsst/ap_pipe#191.

This pipeline needs to be tested after a daily is built with lsst/ap_pipe#191.

@kfindeisen kfindeisen force-pushed the tickets/DM-43418 branch 2 times, most recently from 975ef6a to 8ebc14b Compare August 30, 2024 20:33
Using a stack for the cleanups reduces the number of nested blocks that
need to be added to properly handle various objects, at the cost of one
block for the stack itself. This lets try blocks be reserved purely for
exception handling.
This fixes a bug where the preprocessing runs would not be cleaned up
if the service timed out while waiting for raws.
Copy link
Member

@isullivan isullivan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realize now that we need to add Preprocessing-noForced.yaml with the loadDiaCatalogs config settings for LATISS and LSSTComCamSim`

pipelines/LATISS/ApPipe-noForced.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipelines/LSSTComCamSim/ApPipe-noForced.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
The two subsets will now be run separately. There is also an
"afterburner" subset, but it will not be run by Prompt Processing
at all.
@kfindeisen kfindeisen merged commit d2b5982 into main Sep 4, 2024
5 checks passed
@kfindeisen kfindeisen deleted the tickets/DM-43418 branch September 4, 2024 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants