Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #1720

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #1720

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

MarianaAB19
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on the pull request! 🎉 While there are some instances of code duplication, they don't critically impact the functionality. Consider refactoring to use the format_linter_error function to make your code cleaner and more maintainable in the future. Keep up the good work!

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 12 to 24
return {
"errors": [
{
"line": error["line_number"],
"column": error["column_number"],
"message": error["text"],
"name": error["code"],
"source": "flake8"
}
for error in errors
],
"path": file_path,
"status": "passed" if errors == [] else "failed"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code block from line 12 to line 24 duplicates the logic of the format_linter_error function. According to the checklist, you should use the format_linter_error function to avoid code duplication.

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 29 to 39
return [{
"errors": [
{
"line": error["line_number"],
"column": error["column_number"],
"message": error["text"],
"name": error["code"],
"source": "flake8"
} for error in linter_report[file_path]],
"path": file_path,
"status": "passed" if linter_report[file_path] == [] else "failed"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code block from line 29 to line 39 also duplicates the logic of the format_linter_error function. As per the checklist, you should use the format_linter_error function to avoid repeating code.

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 12 to 24
return {
"errors": [
{
"line": error["line_number"],
"column": error["column_number"],
"message": error["text"],
"name": error["code"],
"source": "flake8"
}
for error in errors
],
"path": file_path,
"status": "passed" if errors == [] else "failed"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code block from line 12 to line 24 duplicates the logic of the format_linter_error function. According to the checklist, you should use the format_linter_error function to avoid code duplication.

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 29 to 40
return [{
"errors": [
{
"line": error["line_number"],
"column": error["column_number"],
"message": error["text"],
"name": error["code"],
"source": "flake8"
} for error in linter_report[file_path]],
"path": file_path,
"status": "passed" if linter_report[file_path] == [] else "failed"
} for file_path in linter_report]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code block from line 29 to line 39 also duplicates the logic of the format_linter_error function. As per the checklist, you should use the format_linter_error function to avoid repeating code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants