Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ - feat: store zaak selection on server #191

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

svenvandescheur
Copy link
Contributor

@svenvandescheur svenvandescheur commented Jul 12, 2024

Research for #84 / Jira PZ-1721.

First step is to have the existing zaak selection moved from session storage to an API. in the future we should be able to pull changes from the API and apply them to our selection. This could allow for near-real time collaboration.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.41935% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.28%. Comparing base (cfc0aaa) to head (8c2bdc8).

Files Patch % Lines
...nd/src/openarchiefbeheer/selection/api/viewsets.py 53.65% 19 Missing ⚠️
backend/src/openarchiefbeheer/selection/models.py 87.50% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #191       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   77.02%   91.28%   +14.26%     
===========================================
  Files         191      136       -55     
  Lines        5602     4740      -862     
  Branches      101        0      -101     
===========================================
+ Hits         4315     4327       +12     
+ Misses       1188      413      -775     
+ Partials       99        0       -99     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants