Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow multiple ui-content-for for one ui-yield-to #286

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

atd
Copy link
Contributor

@atd atd commented Aug 5, 2015

There are cases when you want having different ui-content-for for the same ui-yield-to. An example is having <div ui-yield-to="modals"></div> and defining two modals in different templates.

Currently, only one modal is shown

My concern with this patch is the $compile function. Should it be called twice on the same content?

A use case is having two modals in different templates.

Currently, only one modal is shown
@atd
Copy link
Contributor Author

atd commented Aug 5, 2015

😳

I ran the test locally and everything went ok!

atd added a commit to Grasia/teem that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2015
Closes #49

Using a second modal ui-yield-to, due to a limitation in
mobile-angular-ui

See mcasimir/mobile-angular-ui#286
@mcasimir
Copy link
Owner

mcasimir commented Aug 5, 2015

@atd if you are referring to travis reporting fail, it is due to it runs tests against phantomjs while they need a real non headless browser, i'm working on it integrating ci with saucelabs or browserstack. Will review it 'by hand' and let you know.

Thank u anyway, this is something been requested a lot of times.

@atd
Copy link
Contributor Author

atd commented Aug 5, 2015

@mcasimir yes, it was about Travis

Thank you again!

@atd
Copy link
Contributor Author

atd commented Apr 25, 2016

@mcasimir any plans on merging this?

@mcasimir
Copy link
Owner

mcasimir commented Sep 7, 2016

Hi @adt,

Sorry it passed one year since the PR.

I totally overlooked it once i fixed the tests. And being there since before i opened the board it was very down in the backlog (while usually contributors PRs goes into the in progress column).

I'll look into it soon.

Hope everything ok on your side.

Have a nice evening.

@atd
Copy link
Contributor Author

atd commented Sep 9, 2016

Thank you @mcasimir

I hope it is merged soon 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants