Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a convenience hypothesis with eqv assumptions in rewrite rules side-conditions #134

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 23, 2023

Conversation

JasonGross
Copy link
Collaborator

This should hopefully make mit-plv/fiat-crypto#1778 easier

@JasonGross JasonGross enabled auto-merge (squash) December 23, 2023 01:12
It's a bit kludgy to stuff it in an `and`, but I didn't want to make the
change too invasive right now. :-/
@JasonGross JasonGross merged commit 604362b into mit-plv:master Dec 23, 2023
7 checks passed
@JasonGross JasonGross deleted the give-eqv-hyp branch December 23, 2023 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant