-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cluster without linker #2412
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Cluster without linker #2412
Conversation
|
||
|
||
def cluster_pairwise_predictions_at_threshold( | ||
nodes: AcceptableInputTableType, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably eventually allow the input to also be SplinkDataFrame, but i think that's for a wider PR which allows all public-API functions to accept SplinkDataFrames
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
match probability = 1 hack no longer required due to this refactor
We've heard from several people who want to cluster without a linker. For instance if you are combining predictions from multiple models and want to cluster. e.g. #2358
This PR allows the clustering algorithm to be used without needing a linker, similar to exploratory analysis
Example without linker
Example
Also works for deterministic linking