Add QC check to look for excluded subclassof axioms which are asserted #8291
+21
−68
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… are asserted This tests a case where we said, deliberately: This subclass axiom should not exist, but it turns out, it does!
twhetzel
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
|
@sabrinatoro can we discuss or is there someone else that can help sort out the remaining qc issues? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #8290
This tests a case where we said, deliberately:
This subclass axiom should not exist, but it turns out, it does!
There are quite a few cases like this; good call to look for that check, I would have thought that existed!