Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MEX-355: compute voteType using es query #1144

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dragos-rebegea
Copy link
Contributor

Reasoning

  • fetching logs from elastic search is better in term of logic and performance

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (feac9c2) 56.52% compared to head (3f4c296) 56.52%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #1144   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        56.52%   56.52%           
============================================
  Files              234      234           
  Lines             7800     7800           
  Branches           520      520           
============================================
  Hits              4409     4409           
  Misses            2948     2948           
  Partials           443      443           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 56.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gabrielmatei gabrielmatei added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Aug 21, 2023
@dragos-rebegea dragos-rebegea merged commit 1121226 into development Aug 22, 2023
3 checks passed
@dragos-rebegea dragos-rebegea deleted the MEX-355 branch August 22, 2023 06:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants