[MEX-407] compute boosted rewards

[claudiulataretu]

Reasoning

• add support for boosted rewards into staking module

Proposed Changes

• added new fields into staking model for boosted rewards information
• added compute method for user's boosted rewards from staking contract
• added outdated energy compute for staking contract

How to test

query StakingRewards {
	getStakingRewardsForPosition(
		computeBoosted: true,
		stakingPositions: {
			farmsPositions: [
				{
					farmAddress: <staking_address>,
					user: <user_address>,
					liquidity: ,
					attributes: ,
					identifier: 
				}
			]
		}
	) {
		rewards
		accumulatedRewards
		claimProgress {
			week
			energy {
				amount
				lastUpdateEpoch
				totalLockedTokens
			}
		}
		boostedRewardsWeeklyInfo {
			scAddress
			userAddress
			week
			positionAmount
			apr
			energyForWeek {
				amount
				lastUpdateEpoch
				totalLockedTokens
			}
			rewardsDistributionForWeek {
				tokenId
				percentage
			}
			rewardsForWeek {
				tokenID
				amount
			}
		}
	}
}

• query should return base staking rewards and boosted staking rewards

query UserOutdatedContracts {
	userOutdatedContracts {
		address
		type
		claimProgressOutdated
	}
}

• query result should contain staking address if the energy is outdated

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 140 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ea7769a) 55.92% compared to head (1e60988) 55.71%.
Report is 25 commits behind head on feat/boosted-metastaking.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                     Coverage Diff                      @@
##           feat/boosted-metastaking    #1215      +/-   ##
============================================================
- Coverage                     55.92%   55.71%   -0.22%     
============================================================
  Files                           235      237       +2     
  Lines                          7861     8169     +308     
  Branches                        524      561      +37     
============================================================
+ Hits                           4396     4551     +155     
- Misses                         3018     3137     +119     
- Partials                        447      481      +34     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	55.71% <38.05%> (-0.22%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/modules/farm/mocks/farm.constants.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/modules/farm/v2/services/farm.v2.service.ts	43.10% <ø> (ø)
src/modules/staking/models/staking.model.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/user/models/user.model.ts	70.53% <100.00%> (+0.26%)	⬆️
...vices/context/mocks/context.getter.service.mock.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...es/multiversx-communication/mx.api.service.mock.ts	83.33% <100.00%> (+1.51%)	⬆️
src/modules/farm/mocks/farm.v2.abi.service.mock.ts	56.25% <83.33%> (+27.67%)	⬆️
src/modules/proxy/mocks/proxy.abi.service.mock.ts	78.57% <66.66%> (+7.14%)	⬆️
...ervices/multiversx-communication/mx.api.service.ts	25.26% <50.00%> (ø)
...odules/farm/v2/services/farm.v2.compute.service.ts	45.45% <40.00%> (+17.84%)	⬆️
... and 7 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.