You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I run 4 samples, I only get one version of the nanoplot output files. It looks like the nanoplot module should use the --prefix command to prefix the generic output file names with the sample IDs or sample names, so that they will be unique and not clobber each other.
Following up on this as I have the same issue.
Do we have a newer version of the pipeline that prefixes sample names to Nanoplot outputs or uses Nanocomp?
Version: nf-core/nanoseq v3.1.0 (seems to match with the latest version on github)
Description of the bug
When I run 4 samples, I only get one version of the nanoplot output files. It looks like the nanoplot module should use the --prefix command to prefix the generic output file names with the sample IDs or sample names, so that they will be unique and not clobber each other.
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
Docker/Azure/Tower
Workflow:
Nextflow: 22.10.7
nf-core/nanoseq: 3.1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: