You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned on Slack:#nanoseq https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/CP9GUPH35/p1690374727756149, I'm interested in running parts of the DNA protocol starting from a bam file. Nanoseq completion seemed succesful, but SNV variant calling was not executed, which is my main interest. No vcfs found in the work or output dir. All the pipeline seems to do is check the input and output a renamed copy of my alignment file.
Chris Hakkaart mentioned the RNA protocol was built to run modularly, but the DNA protocol is currently not. It would be a great improvement in terms of flexibility if the DNA protocol could be modified to a modular version. I'm currently not familiar with the code of this nf-core pipeline, but happy to assist in any way possible.
Here's the command I used for a first test run on a 60Gb bam file:
Description of feature
Hi there,
As mentioned on Slack:#nanoseq https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/CP9GUPH35/p1690374727756149, I'm interested in running parts of the DNA protocol starting from a bam file. Nanoseq completion seemed succesful, but SNV variant calling was not executed, which is my main interest. No vcfs found in the work or output dir. All the pipeline seems to do is check the input and output a renamed copy of my alignment file.
Chris Hakkaart mentioned the RNA protocol was built to run modularly, but the DNA protocol is currently not. It would be a great improvement in terms of flexibility if the DNA protocol could be modified to a modular version. I'm currently not familiar with the code of this nf-core pipeline, but happy to assist in any way possible.
Here's the command I used for a first test run on a 60Gb bam file:
Many thanks
Mattias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: