Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modular version of the DNA protocol #252

Open
mvheetve opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

modular version of the DNA protocol #252

mvheetve opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mvheetve
Copy link

Description of feature

Hi there,

As mentioned on Slack:#nanoseq https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/CP9GUPH35/p1690374727756149, I'm interested in running parts of the DNA protocol starting from a bam file. Nanoseq completion seemed succesful, but SNV variant calling was not executed, which is my main interest. No vcfs found in the work or output dir. All the pipeline seems to do is check the input and output a renamed copy of my alignment file.

Chris Hakkaart mentioned the RNA protocol was built to run modularly, but the DNA protocol is currently not. It would be a great improvement in terms of flexibility if the DNA protocol could be modified to a modular version. I'm currently not familiar with the code of this nf-core pipeline, but happy to assist in any way possible.

Here's the command I used for a first test run on a 60Gb bam file:

nextflow \
	run nf-core/nanoseq \
	--input ${samplesheet} \
	--outdir ${outputDir} \
	--protocol DNA \
	--skip_demultiplexing \
	--skip_alignment \
	--call_variants \
	--variant_caller medaka \
	--phase_vcf \
	--skip_sv \
	--skip_quantification \
	--skip_fusion_analysis \
	--skip_modification_analysis \
	-r 3.1.0 \
	-latest \
	-resume \
	-work-dir ${WORKDIR} \
	-profile vsc_ugent,$SLURM_CLUSTERS

Many thanks
Mattias

@mvheetve mvheetve added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant