-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove lib folder #132
Remove lib folder #132
Conversation
|
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0 | |||
- [[#113](https://github.com/nf-core/proteinfold/pull/113)] - Include esmfold dbs for full data sets. | |||
- [[PR #114](https://github.com/nf-core/rnaseq/pull/114)] - Update paths to test dbs. | |||
- [[PR #117](https://github.com/nf-core/proteinfold/pull/117)] - Update pipeline template to [nf-core/tools 2.10](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/releases/tag/2.10). | |||
- [PR #130](https://github.com/nf-core/proteinfold/pull/130) - Remove `lib/` directory. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- [PR #130](https://github.com/nf-core/proteinfold/pull/130) - Remove `lib/` directory. | |
- [[PR #130](https://github.com/nf-core/proteinfold/pull/130)] - Remove `lib/` directory. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good spot and actually is #132 😓
PREPARE_ALPHAFOLD2_DBS.out.uniprot | ||
) | ||
ch_multiqc = ALPHAFOLD2.out.multiqc_report | ||
ch_versions = ch_versions.mix(ALPHAFOLD2.out.versions) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// | ||
// WORKFLOW: Run colabfold | ||
// | ||
else if(params.mode == "colabfold") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we just leave it if instead of else if, we can have the option Cedric wanted, of running multiple tools in the same run.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We would have to mix the channels of versions and multiqc too, i am not sure how tricky it would be for multiqc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will be for a different PR, will open an issue though. Also, I am starting to think that we could do it for a 1.2 version and leave this one as it is.
Remove
lib/
directory and replace with nf-core subworkflows.PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).CHANGELOG.md
is updated.