Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make sure close behavior correct #25

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hzgotb
Copy link

@hzgotb hzgotb commented Dec 23, 2024

  1. 如果在 closeMethod 前设置 close = true ,那么如果 cloaseMethod 执行失败时,close 的值就是错误的。
  2. close需要将用户定义的_close方法的返回值返回,以便于用户有关于返回值的操作。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the handling of the close operation, ensuring that the closure logic executes correctly before marking the instance as closed.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced flexibility in the retrieval and execution of the close method, allowing for better control flow and error handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes focus on refining the close method in the Base class within src/index.ts. The modification alters the handling of the #closed property and the _close method execution. The new implementation provides more robust control flow by deferring the closure of the instance until after the _close method is confirmed to be a function and successfully executed.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/index.ts Modified close() method logic in Base class to improve closure handling and method execution

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Instance as Base Instance
    participant CloseMethod as _close Method

    Instance->>CloseMethod: Check if _close exists
    alt _close is a function
        Instance->>CloseMethod: Execute _close
        CloseMethod-->>Instance: Await resolution
        Instance->>Instance: Set #closed = true
    else _close is not a function
        Instance->>Instance: Set #closed = true
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Closure

In the realm of code, a method refined,
Closing gently, with logic intertwined
No rush to seal, but wait and see
Each promise resolved, then setting free
A dance of methods, elegant and light! 🔒✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/index.ts (1)

104-104: Confirm that ignoring the lack of _close is intentional.
When _close is not a function, the code simply sets “#closed = true” and returns. Verify that this behavior aligns with your intended lifecycle. If there's a scenario where an unimplemented _close implies incomplete resource cleanup, consider emitting a warning or error event instead of silently closing the instance.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f03438 and 74f3605.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/index.ts (2)

109-111: Return the result of _close to fulfill the PR objective.
The code correctly awaits the _close method and returns its result, which aligns with your second objective to expose the return value for further handling. Ensure that your tests cover both successful and failed _close executions to confirm the correct state of “#closed” and the correct result return.


101-102: Validate the approach to retrieving the _close method.
By using Reflect.get to retrieve the _close method, the code ensures flexibility in how the method is defined. However, please confirm that any dynamic or overridden _close definitions can still be correctly accessed and invoked without introducing unexpected side effects.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the _close method usage and implementation to verify this concern.


Let me fix the ast-grep commands and gather more specific information about the implementation.


Let me try one more search to understand the complete class context and usage.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Using Reflect.get for _close method is safe in this context
The code performs proper type checking after retrieving the method (typeof closeMethod !== 'function') and has appropriate fallback behavior. Since _close appears to be an optional method that may not always be present (as evidenced by the type check), using Reflect.get is actually a safer approach than direct property access, as it handles cases where the method might be undefined without throwing errors.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _close method definitions and usages
ast-grep --pattern 'private _close' -l
ast-grep --pattern '_close =' -l
ast-grep --pattern 'this._close' -l

# Search for any Reflect.get usage with _close
rg "Reflect\.get.*_close" -l

# Look for class definitions that might contain _close
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  _close($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 549


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _close method definitions and usages with proper language specification
ast-grep --pattern 'private _close' --lang=typescript
ast-grep --pattern 'this._close' --lang=typescript

# Get the content of the file to understand the context
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Reflect\.get.*_close" src/index.ts

# Look for class definitions containing _close with proper language
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  _close($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' --lang=typescript

Length of output: 897


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the class implementation
rg -B 20 -A 20 "class.*{" src/index.ts

# Search for any private method declarations
ast-grep --pattern 'private $_($_) {
  $$$
}' --lang=typescript

# Look for any _close references in the entire file
rg "_close" src/index.ts

Length of output: 711

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/sdk-base@25

commit: 74f3605

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

fengmk2 commented Dec 23, 2024

加一个单测?

@hzgotb
Copy link
Author

hzgotb commented Dec 24, 2024

加一个单测?

问一下。
https://github.com/node-modules/sdk-base/blob/6f03438ca12232277342c5b2d4129436ff66f4cd/test/index.test.ts#L557-564
两次close是什么用意。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants