Update Moderation Policy to handle LLM "contributions" #942
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ljharb
reviewed
Jan 3, 2025
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2025
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <[email protected]>
targos
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2025
|
Pinging @nodejs/tsc because of this at the bottom of the current policy:
|
anonrig
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2025
marco-ippolito
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2025
richardlau
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
ruyadorno
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
legendecas
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2025
|
72 hours have elapsed, merging |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems likely that the volume of LLM-generated PRs and comments is going to increase, and a lot of it is just noise tbh, bringing no value for the contributor nor the project, and wasting reviewers' time. Since those do not exactly fit "bot" nor "spam" categories, I suggest we create a new category for those, slightly more forgiving since it's probably fair to assume there's an actual human behind.
I don't know if it needs to be explicitly stated, using an LLM is not the problem per-se, as long as the contribution has value and the contributor is able to back it up – so basically "if you act like a bot, don't complain about being treated as one".