-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sqlite: expose backup api #56253
Open
geeksilva97
wants to merge
13
commits into
nodejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
geeksilva97:sqlite-backup
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+547
−0
Open
sqlite: expose backup api #56253
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
666034f
sqlite, test: expose sqlite online backup api
geeksilva97 c73a3cc
sqlite: resolve backup promise with total transferred pages
geeksilva97 5ad3f48
sqlite,test: test DatabaseSync.prototype.backup interface
geeksilva97 a050cd6
sqlite: pass object to progress function instead of two args
geeksilva97 9d8538b
fixup: improve tests
geeksilva97 4abb1b2
sqlite: update interface
geeksilva97 74a9ad4
doc: add backup docs
geeksilva97 d58fd03
test: use temp dir to test invalid paths
geeksilva97 e3e7431
doc: fixup: fix typos
geeksilva97 acec23e
fixup: improve formatting
geeksilva97 fa23c05
fixup: centralize backup error handling
geeksilva97 c532c58
fixup: fix new env properties order
geeksilva97 0df678e
fixup: await rejects assertion
geeksilva97 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not something that needs to happen in this PR necessarily, but we will need to rename the
DatabaseSync
class now that an async operation is being added. My plan was always to keep the sync and async APIs separated, similar to the fs module. Since we are breaking from that, I'll leave it up to others to decide on naming, keeping in mind that there is already a feature request for an async API.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it could be a start for that async API.
#54307
I asked about this in the issue but I didn't get an answer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question, @cjihrig . In your plans, would DatabaseSync have a backup feature?
Personally, I have no problem moving this to a
Database
class (without theSync
) as a start for that async API.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it need to be a method on
DatabaseSync
? Could it be a separate API exposed on thenode:sqlite
module? e.g.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this idea!