Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

object/replicate: Add signature to the replication RPC #302

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

carpawell
Copy link
Member

@carpawell carpawell commented Jul 5, 2024

I am not sure about create naming.

@cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor

I am not sure about create naming.

to me it's unclear too. Lucky we can freely change it later. Now i cannot suggest nothing better than straightforward attach_signature

cthulhu-rider
cthulhu-rider previously approved these changes Jul 5, 2024
object/service.proto Show resolved Hide resolved
roman-khimov
roman-khimov previously approved these changes Jul 17, 2024
@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

@cthulhu-rider, @roman-khimov, renamed the field name and specified signature algorithm. Do you have any preferences about the scheme? Do we have any rules of when we try to use one or another?

cthulhu-rider
cthulhu-rider previously approved these changes Jul 26, 2024
object/service.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Object signing now may be requested to ensure a replication copy was received.
Closes #299.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

@roman-khimov, have you something to add here?

@roman-khimov
Copy link
Member

I'm mostly concerned about ersatz-chain test results.

@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit 01229b4 into master Aug 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov deleted the feat/add-replication-signing branch August 19, 2024 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants