fix: fix to unoThemes issues

[Arieldelossantos]

GitHub Issue: #

Proposed Changes

• Bug fix
• Build or CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other, please describe:

Description

• Fix canary issues relating to unothemes namespace change (https://github.com/unoplatform/Uno.Themes/blob/master/doc%2Fmaterial-migration.md#updating-to-unothemes-v50 )
• Changing the PR template

PR Checklist

Always applicable

No matter your changes, these checks always apply.

• Updated CHANGELOG.md.
  • Use the latest Major.Minor.X header if you do a Patch change.
  • Create a new Major.Minor.X header if you do a Minor or Major change.
  • If you create a new header, it aligns with the Impact on version section and matches what is generated in the build pipeline.
• Documentation files were updated according with the changes.
  • Update README.md and TemplateConfig.md if you made changes to templating.
  • Update AzurePipelines.md and APP_README.md if you made changes to pipelines.
  • Update Diagnostics.md if you made changes to diagnostic tools.
  • Update Architecture.md and its diagrams if you made architecture decisions or if you introduced new recipes.
  • ...and so forth: Make sure you update the documentation files associated to the recipes you changed. Review the topics by looking at the content of the doc/ folder.
• Images about the template are referenced from the wiki and added as images in this git.
• TODO comments are hints for next steps for users of the template and not planned work.

Contextual

Based on your changes these checks may not apply.

• Automated tests for the changes have been added/updated.
• Tested on all relevant platforms

Other information

Internal Issue (If applicable):

[jeanplevesque]

The PR template should probably be updated on this canary repo because it doesn't make sense.

[Arieldelossantos]

should i merge this one and create another PR for the Template fix?? @jeanplevesque

[jeanplevesque]

should i merge this one and create another PR for the Template fix?? @jeanplevesque

@Arieldelossantos Fix it in this PR so that you can also have a better PR template for this PR.

[jeanplevesque]

These are wrong, no? I'm not sure to understand how you can have both these pipelines in the PR validation?

[Arieldelossantos]

These are wrong, no? I'm not sure to understand how you can have both these pipelines in the PR validation?

we're investigating why the variable is not restricting this validation, because we have one to check whether is a PR or not :/