Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

o1vm/riscv32im: being strict on scope and unsafe def #2913

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

dannywillems
Copy link
Member

It is mostly to simplify formal verification tools generating Coq/Lean from Rust code

It is mostly to simplify formal verification tools generating Coq/Lean from Rust code
@dannywillems dannywillems changed the title o1vm/riscv32im: being strict on scope o1vm/riscv32im: being strict on scope and unsafe def Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 56.00000% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.37%. Comparing base (41e4397) to head (ff89083).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
o1vm/src/interpreters/riscv32im/interpreter.rs 56.00% 22 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2913      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.36%   73.37%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         259      259              
  Lines       61542    61553      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        45151    45166      +15     
+ Misses      16391    16387       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Base automatically changed from dw/o1vm-lookup-80limits to master December 28, 2024 11:49
@dannywillems dannywillems merged commit edbc8be into master Dec 28, 2024
8 checks passed
@dannywillems dannywillems deleted the dw/simply-prettifying branch December 28, 2024 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants