Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relationship between an intrinsic neuron and its neuropil of innervation #754

Open
Clare72 opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #755
Open

relationship between an intrinsic neuron and its neuropil of innervation #754

Clare72 opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #755
Assignees

Comments

@Clare72
Copy link
Contributor

Clare72 commented Aug 17, 2023

Ideally, intrinsic neurons have all of their synapses restricted to a particular region of the CNS. In real life there may be a few stray synapses just outside the region.

Label: 'synapses restricted to region'
Exact synonym: 'intrinsic to'
Definition: 'A relationship between a neuron and a region, where the neuron has essentially all of its synapses in that region.'
Comment: 'Relationship may still be used if a very small number of synapses fall slightly outside the boundaries of the region.'
Parent: RO:0013001 ('has synaptic IO in region')
Domain: CL:0000540 ('neuron') - will be inherited from 'has synaptic terminal in'

I don't think we want to make this a subproperty of input and output relationships, in case there are neurons that do not have one or the other - some sensory neurons might not have synaptic inputs(?)

related to FlyBase/drosophila-anatomy-developmental-ontology#1626

@Clare72 Clare72 self-assigned this Aug 17, 2023
@Clare72 Clare72 linked a pull request Aug 17, 2023 that will close this issue
@addiehl
Copy link

addiehl commented Sep 11, 2023

Suggested that text definition be based on parent property phrasing (per David OS):

A relationship between a neuron and a region, where all of the functionally relevant input and output synapses are in that region.

Add a comment that any class using this relation should not have another restriction using this relation to a non-overlapping region.

@ddooley
Copy link
Contributor

ddooley commented Nov 4, 2024

Reviewed On Nov4 2024. @Clare72 Are you able to finalize the textual definition based on above comments?

@Clare72
Copy link
Contributor Author

Clare72 commented Nov 4, 2024

Does the existing PR need changing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants