DO NOT MERGE: New AP for unilateral injection #551
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes #550
|
@dosumis can you include a description on how someone would go about using this? Suggestion: keep updating the issue text so this thread doesn't get long and out-of-hand, like many do in the OBO world ;) |
Adding owl:Axiom as range
Added Justification and attempt at an example.
|
Have added attempt at justification & an example. |
matentzn
changed the title
|
This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update. |
|
This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #550
Have added OWL axiom as domain. Think it would be good if this is can restrict usage, but don't know if that might have unintended consequences (e.g. due to possibility of alternative reification patterns using RDF standards)