Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new hidden deps Merlin support for handling implicit-transitive-deps false #10535

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

voodoos
Copy link
Collaborator

@voodoos voodoos commented May 15, 2024

With release 5.2 the compiler introduces a new flag -H to introduce dependencies that are required for linking but should be hidden from the currently built module. Merlin for 5.2 follows with two new configuration directives: BH and SH that allows to provide hidden build and source paths.

This PR effectively takes advantage of these new directives to correctly communicate hidden dependencies to Merlin.

All versions of Merlin since 4.6 will accept that flag, but only the preview versions for 5.2 can actually take advantage of this additional information.

@nojb
Copy link
Collaborator

nojb commented May 17, 2024

Hello @voodoos, thanks for this PR. Note that #9333 is being worked on at the moment (cc @MA0010). Once that is done, you will be able to simplify the patch because the lists of requires given by Compilation_context.requires will be annotated with a flag indicating whether each dependency is direct or transitive (= hidden), and you won't need to do this computation "just" for Merlin. Moreover, I think it would be great if we could merge this PR at the same time that Dune itself is able to support -H.

Accordingly, I suggest to suspend this PR until #9333 is done; does that sound OK? I hope that there will be a PR for #9333 in the next week or so.

@nojb nojb self-assigned this May 17, 2024
@nojb
Copy link
Collaborator

nojb commented Jun 28, 2024

@voodoos #10644 has been merged; so it should now be possible to finalize this PR by using Compilation_context.requires_hidden. Thanks for waiting!

@Leonidas-from-XIV
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @voodoos could you rebase the PR? We were talking about this in the last dune-dev meeting and it would be nice to have it as part of the 3.17 release.

@voodoos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

voodoos commented Oct 7, 2024

@Leonidas-from-XIV rebased and signed-off

Copy link
Collaborator

@Leonidas-from-XIV Leonidas-from-XIV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add a changelog entry? This is one of the highlights of the release, would be good for people to be aware of it :)

src/dune_rules/merlin/merlin.ml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Use new BH / SH directives

Make specific tests for OCaml 5.2

Signed-off-by: Ulysse Gérard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulysse Gérard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulysse Gérard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulysse Gérard <[email protected]>
test/blackbox-tests/test-cases/overlapping-deps.t Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
-> required by _build/default/proj2/.merlin-conf/lib-bar
-> required by _build/default/proj2/bar.cma
-> required by %{cma:proj2/bar} at command line:1
[1]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting that this triggers the error now, this could be a regression for the release but it seems like the error is what should've happened here anyway.

@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ that wasn't found:
1 | (executable (name prog) (libraries a))
^
Error: Library "a" not found.
-> required by _build/default/c/.prog.eobjs/byte/dune__exe__Prog.cmi
-> required by _build/default/c/.prog.eobjs/native/dune__exe__Prog.cmx
-> required by _build/default/c/.merlin-conf/exe-prog
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My main concern is that this changes so many tests, but given the dependency that is getting reported is an internal one and stays an internal one I believe this is not an issue.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the PR changes some evaluation order that makes Dune errors after following a different branch. Not sure what causes this however...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rgrinberg Can you please weight in whether this is an issue? It doesn't seem to be wrong, but maybe the order is important in some way I am not aware of?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found the difference: before we only "peeked" (with Resolve.peek) at the dependencies and now we "read" them.

I will revert that change as is seems wrong to introduce dependencies here.

voodoos and others added 2 commits October 10, 2024 16:36
Co-authored-by: Marek Kubica <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulysse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulysse Gérard <[email protected]>
@rgrinberg
Copy link
Member

@nojb I think you've assigned yourself to this PR. Do you mind taking a final look, and if everything is OK, merging?

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
- Use Merlin new configuration directives `BH` and `SH` for hidden dependencies.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would mention that hidden dependencies correspond to the -h flag instead of internal merlin directives which most people are unaware of.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it is always better to write Changes entries from the point of view of the user, not the developer. In this case, something like

- Make Merlin/OCaml-LSP aware of "hidden" dependencies used by
  `(implicit_transitive_deps false)` via the `-H` compiler flag.

would be more useful for the occasional reader.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I took the liberty of tweaking the Changes entry in this manner. Planning to merge once CI passes. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@nojb nojb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
- Use Merlin new configuration directives `BH` and `SH` for hidden dependencies.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it is always better to write Changes entries from the point of view of the user, not the developer. In this case, something like

- Make Merlin/OCaml-LSP aware of "hidden" dependencies used by
  `(implicit_transitive_deps false)` via the `-H` compiler flag.

would be more useful for the occasional reader.

@nojb nojb merged commit b39ad6d into ocaml:main Oct 11, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@voodoos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

voodoos commented Oct 11, 2024

Thank you @nojb !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants