-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix] [directory targets] Fix promotion of directory targets in some cases #10931
Open
ejgallego
wants to merge
1
commit into
ocaml:main
Choose a base branch
from
ejgallego:fix_promotion_dir_targets
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
- Fix promotion of directory targets when the promoted directory has | ||
sub-directories with only other sub-directories inside; regression | ||
in b1c339b / #9407 (@ejgallego, closes #10609) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions
24
test/blackbox-tests/test-cases/directory-targets/github10609/run.t
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
We test that a directory target with only other subdirs can be | ||
properly promoted. | ||
|
||
$ cat > dune-project <<EOF | ||
> (lang dune 3.16) | ||
> (using directory-targets 0.1) | ||
> EOF | ||
|
||
$ cat > dune <<EOF | ||
> (rule | ||
> (targets (dir node_modules)) | ||
> (mode (promote (until-clean))) | ||
> (action | ||
> (progn | ||
> (system "mkdir -p node_modules/node-cmake/") | ||
> (system "touch node_modules/node-cmake/.jshintrc") | ||
> (system "mkdir -p node_modules/node-cmake/node_modules/ansi-regex") | ||
> (system "touch node_modules/node-cmake/node_modules/ansi-regex/index.js") | ||
> ))) | ||
> EOF | ||
|
||
$ dune build node_modules | ||
$ ls node_modules | ||
node-cmake |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure for this fix, I think this code is fine. The issue is coming from somewhere else.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for the help. My impression is that indeed it matters that we add the binding
{ dir -> [] }
to the map, as even if the directory doesn't have files, it can have subdirs.But I didn't track down exactly the part that makes the current code break.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So indeed you are correct that the crash happens at
remove_state_files_and_subdirectories
, but my impression is that we break the invariant about source representation that the above function requires.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get it, that's fair point.
The question I have now is, are we going to allow promoting empty directories ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the confusion is about what we call "empty directory", empty directories are OK not to promote in my view, however here the directories in question are not empty, they just have no files, however they do have other subdirectories, so definitively they need to be considered part of the sources.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested the fix, it is promoting even empty directories.
This is not fixing exactly the test-case, it's fixing it indirectly by allowing an empty directory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed after this, empty directories are promoted. I don't see why they shouldn't be promoted?
We could optimize this away, but I am not sure it is worth it, it would likely require more invasive changes. Note that in the PR that caused this regression, not promoting empty dirs was regarded as an optimization IIRC.
Note that the fix doesn't exactly allow "empty directories", it allows too, crutially, directories that have no files but are not empty, such as the test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking to this further. I agree with you, this where we need to fix the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is one of the solution moyodiallo@b00b92e.
The thing is adding all the parent directories of the collected files, it will ends up with no empty directory.