Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experimental Windows CI build using Appveyor #1764

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2014
Merged

Conversation

avsm
Copy link
Member

@avsm avsm commented Oct 1, 2014

Add an experimental Appveyor Windows/Cygwin32 build file

This uses the Appveyor CI service (similar to Travis) to build
OPAM on Cygwin on Windows. It currently installs fine, but then
runs into ocsigen/lwt#84 when installing Lwt.

See #246

This uses the Appveyor CI service (similar to Travis) to build
OPAM on Cygwin on Windows.  It currently installs fine, but then
runs into ocsigen/lwt#84 when installing Lwt.

See ocaml#246
Experimental Windows CI build
@avsm avsm mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2014
@avsm
Copy link
Member Author

avsm commented Oct 1, 2014

AltGr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2014
Experimental Windows CI build using Appveyor
@AltGr AltGr merged commit af39dd1 into ocaml:master Oct 2, 2014
@AltGr
Copy link
Member

AltGr commented Oct 2, 2014

ack, merge commit, please don't PR them (adds noise to the history)

@AltGr
Copy link
Member

AltGr commented Oct 2, 2014

Otherwise: neat !

@andyli
Copy link
Contributor

andyli commented May 9, 2017

Is AppVeyor currently enabled for this repo?
I checked https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ocaml/opam but it says "Project not found or access denied.".

@andyli
Copy link
Contributor

andyli commented May 9, 2017

Ah, got it, it's at https://ci.appveyor.com/project/AltGr/opam.
I've created #2929 to show the build status badges with links to the build pages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants