Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: substitute UT_ASSERTs with asserts from GTEST part 5 #744

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EuphoricThinking
Copy link
Contributor

The PR is a part of a major fix, which will be provided in multiple files.

Ref. #569

Description

Checklist

  • Code compiles without errors locally
  • All tests pass locally
  • CI workflows execute properly
  • CI workflows, not executed per PR (e.g. Nightly), execute properly
  • New tests added, especially if they will fail without my changes
  • Added/extended example(s) to cover this functionality
  • Extended the README/documentation
  • All newly added source files have a license
  • All newly added source files are referenced in CMake files
  • Logger (with debug/info/... messages) is used

@EuphoricThinking EuphoricThinking requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 15:37
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ permissions:

env:
# for installation testing - it should match with version set in CMake
UMF_VERSION: 0.9.0
UMF_VERSION: 0.10.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please rebase, Lukasz's commit should not belong here.

@@ -42,7 +42,14 @@ std::vector<int> get_available_cpus() {
CPU_ZERO(mask);

int ret = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), mask);
UT_ASSERTeq(ret, 0);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pls describe in commit message what's really changed here - it seems like changing UT_ASSERTs is again, just a small addition 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants