-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NNPA] Use device attribute to control device placement for ONNX operations #2510
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4027852
remove execNodesOnCPU and add device attribute
tungld c7c8ede
lambda function
tungld 698d095
refactoring
tungld a93a39f
Merge branch 'main' into nnpa-device-placement
tungld 6d3b927
Merge
tungld a589939
Add warning of there is a mismatch between users and compiler about N…
tungld b5aa9fb
Merge branch 'main' into nnpa-device-placement
tungld 9fddaaa
Add DevicePlacement pass
tungld b451245
introduce device-placement pass
tungld b1205e0
Merge branch 'main' into nnpa-device-placement
tungld 253e370
run EmitZHighIR lit test on big endian machine
tungld File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to do a check of legality check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean something like
isNNPA() && isLegality()
?device=NNPA
can beforcing to NNPA
ormaybe good for NNPA
. I am OK going with one of them.Forcing to NNPA
is convenient when we annotate an op withdevice=NNPA
directly and we really want that op go to NNPA despite of compiler optimizations.maybe good for NNPA
is safe when we use a cost model, since the cost model may have a mistake in assigning an op to NNPA (e.g. that op is not suitable for NNPA)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Forcing to NNPA
is also useful when we have dynamic shape, and we want an op to run NNPA because the compiler is not able to know if it is suitable for CPU or NNPA.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should have been clearer