Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generate go bindings in one package per contract/library #270

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RnkSngh
Copy link
Collaborator

@RnkSngh RnkSngh commented Dec 2, 2024

PR to make each contract wihtin each sol file have it's own module.

Previously, if we ran the make bindings-gen-go command, it would produce go files which would not build for the mars contract, since it would declare all contracts declared in the contracts/examples/Mars.sol (Mars, PanicingMars, etc) as part of one go module. This would produce errors if you tried to build the go bindings using go build ./... because it would result in doubly-declaring certain structs (e.g. AckPacket for Mars contracts). To allow our go bindings to be robust to having multiple contracts to be declared in the same sol files, we can declare each contract as part of it's own package.

This should only impact users of the reverting/panicking mars (of which there are none), and IbcDispatcher go bindings

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new contract bindings for various Ethereum contracts, enhancing functionality related to inter-blockchain communication (IBC).
    • Added support for event handling, including ownership transfer events and packet acknowledgment mechanisms.
    • Enhanced contract interaction methods for better usability and flexibility.
    • Implemented a mechanism to conditionally skip tests based on environment variables.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed several packages and structures to improve clarity and maintainability.
    • Restructured code for better organization and readability without altering core functionalities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved package name handling for consistent contract interaction, ensuring correct binding to contract types.
    • Enhanced workflow configuration to include new environment variables for better test management.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to multiple Go packages related to Ethereum smart contracts. Key updates include renaming packages to better reflect their functionality, restructuring bindings for various contracts, and enhancing the generation of Go bindings from ABI files. The Makefile was modified to improve package name derivation and enforce a build step after generating bindings. New structures and methods were added to facilitate interactions with the contracts, while deprecated variables were retained for backward compatibility.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Makefile Updated bindings-gen-go target to derive package names from ABI type names instead of directory names. Added a build command after ABI generation.
bindings/go/iappstateverifier/IAppStateVerifier.go Renamed package from iproofverifier to iappstateverifier. Introduced IAppStateVerifier interface and associated metadata. Added multiple types and methods for contract interaction.
bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go Renamed package from ibcdispatcher to ibceventsemitter. Added various event structures and iterators for IBC events, enhancing event handling capabilities.
bindings/go/ibcpacketsender/IbcPacketSender.go Renamed package from ibcdispatcher to ibcpacketsender. Introduced new contract binding structure for IbcPacketSender, including metadata and methods for packet sending.
bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go Renamed package from ilightclient to iclientupdates. Defined metadata and structures for IClientUpdates, including methods for client updates.
bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go Renamed package from mars to panickingmars. Introduced new types and methods for contract functionalities, including ownership transfer and packet acknowledgment.
bindings/go/protochannel/ProtoChannel.go Renamed package from channel to protochannel. No structural changes, only package renaming.
bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go Renamed package from channel to protocounterparty. Defined new types and methods for contract interaction, retaining original functionalities.
bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go Renamed package from mars to revertingbytesmars. Updated contract bindings with new types and methods, maintaining original functionalities while reflecting the new package name.
bindings/go/revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go Renamed package from mars to revertingemptymars. Introduced new data structures and methods for handling IBC packets and acknowledgments.
bindings/go/revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go Renamed package from mars to revertingstringclosechannelmars. Added new structures and methods for contract functionalities, including ownership management and event filtering.
bindings/go/revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go Renamed package from mars to revertingstringmars. Introduced new types and methods for contract interaction, including event handling for ownership transfers.
.github/workflows/foundry.yml Added environment variable RUN_FORK_TEST to the "Fork Deploy Test" step in the workflow configuration.
test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol Introduced a conditional check for skipFork based on RUN_FORK_TEST to control test execution flow. Added log statements to indicate when tests are skipped.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: auto generate go bindings #117: This PR introduces new functionality for building contracts and generating Go bindings, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the Makefile and the bindings-gen-go target enhancements.
  • h5law/release-workflows #131: This PR includes updates to the Makefile for generating Go bindings and aligns with the objectives of the main PR by enhancing the build process and binding generation for Ethereum contracts.

Suggested labels

enhancement

"In the land of code where rabbits play,
New bindings hop in, brightening the day.
With packages renamed and functions anew,
We build and we bind, with a joyful crew!
So let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
For in this code garden, we flourish for all! 🐇✨"


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go (3)

Line range hint 65-65: Ensure variable naming consistency

The variable IbcEventsEmitterABI is deprecated but still present. Verify if it is still needed or if it can be safely removed to avoid confusion.

Consider removing the deprecated variable if it is no longer in use:

-// IbcEventsEmitterABI is the input ABI used to generate the binding from.
-// Deprecated: Use IbcEventsEmitterMetaData.ABI instead.
-var IbcEventsEmitterABI = IbcEventsEmitterMetaData.ABI

Line range hint 87-89: Redundant type assertion in error handling

In the function NewIbcEventsEmitter, the error handling could be simplified.

Consider simplifying the error return line:

-	if err != nil {
-		return nil, err
-	}
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to bind IbcEventsEmitter: %w", err)
+	}

This provides more context if the binding fails.


Line range hint 785-788: Potential performance improvement in event iteration

The Next() method in event iterators can be optimized by reducing redundant checks.

Consider restructuring the method to avoid checking it.fail and it.done multiple times.

Makefile (1)

69-69: Unnecessary use of exit 1 after go build

The command go build ./... || exit 1 is redundant because go build will exit with a non-zero status on failure.

You can simplify the command:

-	go build ./... || exit 1; \
+	go build ./...; \
bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go (1)

Line range hint 23-24: Empty ABI in metadata

The ABI field in ProtoCounterpartyMetaData is empty. This might cause runtime errors when attempting to bind contract methods.

Ensure that the ABI is correctly defined. If the contract does not have any methods, consider whether the binding is necessary.

bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go (2)

Line range hint 47-50: Error handling in constructor functions

In NewIClientUpdates, errors from bindIClientUpdates are returned directly. Consider adding context to the error message for better debugging.

Modify the error return to include additional context:

-	if err != nil {
-		return nil, err
-	}
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to bind IClientUpdates: %w", err)
+	}

Line range hint 104-111: Type assertion may cause panics

In the LIGHTCLIENTTYPE function, the type assertion may panic if the contract does not return the expected type.

Add error checking to ensure safe type conversion.

Apply this diff to handle the error gracefully:

 	out0, ok := out[0].(uint8)
+	if !ok {
+		return 0, fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for LIGHTCLIENTTYPE output")
+	}
 
 	return out0, err
bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go (1)

Line range hint 1-894: Architecture aligns well with the PR objectives.

The separation of the RevertingBytesMars contract into its own package:

  • Improves modularity by avoiding naming conflicts
  • Makes the codebase more maintainable
  • Follows Go best practices for package organization

This change successfully addresses the original issue of build errors when multiple contracts were in the same package.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1272b6c and 22dc16c.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/iappstateverifier/IAppStateVerifier.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/ibcpacketsender/IbcPacketSender.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/protochannel/ProtoChannel.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • bindings/go/protochannel/ProtoChannel.go
🔇 Additional comments (15)
bindings/go/iappstateverifier/IAppStateVerifier.go (1)

4-4: Package name updated to iappstateverifier

Changing the package name to iappstateverifier aligns with the directory structure and enhances code organization.

bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go (1)

4-4: Package name updated to panickingmars

Renaming the package to panickingmars reflects the specific functionality of the module and improves code clarity.

bindings/go/revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go (1)

4-4: Package name updated to revertingemptymars

Updating the package name to revertingemptymars enhances alignment with the module's purpose and improves code organization.

bindings/go/revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go (1)

4-4: Package name updated to revertingstringmars

Changing the package name to revertingstringmars accurately reflects the module's functionality and aids in maintaining a clear codebase.

bindings/go/revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go (1)

4-4: Package name updated to revertingstringclosechannelmars

Renaming the package to revertingstringclosechannelmars aligns with the module's specific functionality and improves code organization.

bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go (1)

4-4: Package name change may introduce import errors

The package name has been changed from ibcdispatcher to ibceventsemitter. Ensure that all references to this package in the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent import errors.

Run the following script to identify any references to the old package name:

bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go (1)

4-4: Package name change may introduce import errors

The package name has been changed from channel to protocounterparty. Ensure that all references to this package in the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent import errors.

Run the following script to identify any references to the old package name:

bindings/go/ibcpacketsender/IbcPacketSender.go (2)

Line range hint 63-69: Check for correct contract method bindings

The method SendPacket has been defined. Ensure that the parameters and return types match the contract's actual implementation.

Double-check that the types [32]byte, []byte, and uint64 correctly correspond to the Solidity types in the contract.


4-4: Package name change requires codebase updates

The package name has been changed from ibcdispatcher to ibcpacketsender. Ensure that all references to this package have been updated to prevent import errors.

Run the following script to find references to the old package name:

bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go (1)

4-4: Package name change may cause import issues

The package name has been changed from ilightclient to iclientupdates. Ensure that all references to ilightclient are updated.

Run the following script to find any outdated references:

bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go (5)

4-4: LGTM: Package name follows the new convention.

The package name revertingbytesmars aligns with the PR objective of having separate packages for each contract, improving modularity and avoiding naming conflicts.


Line range hint 29-71: LGTM: Data structures are well-defined and properly mapped.

The Go structs (AckPacket, Height, IbcEndpoint, IbcPacket) are correctly generated from their Solidity counterparts with appropriate type mappings and maintain good Go naming conventions.


Line range hint 77-669: LGTM: Contract methods are well-structured and properly bound.

The contract methods are:

  • Properly categorized (Caller, Transactor, Filterer)
  • Well-documented with clear function signatures
  • Implementing consistent error handling

Line range hint 671-894: LGTM: Event handling implementation is robust.

The OwnershipTransferred event handling:

  • Follows standard Go patterns
  • Implements proper iterator patterns with thread-safety
  • Includes comprehensive error handling and resource cleanup

Line range hint 74-75: Verify ABI completeness and deprecation handling.

The code maintains backward compatibility by keeping the deprecated ABI variable while directing users to MetaData.ABI. Consider adding a deprecation timeline to help users plan their migration.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results from the executed scripts, I can now provide a final response:

ABI deprecation handling is consistent with Go bindings best practices

The deprecation notice for RevertingBytesMarsABI follows the standard pattern used across all Go contract bindings in the codebase, directing users to use RevertingBytesMarsMetaData.ABI. The ABI is complete, containing all contract methods, events, and errors, including core functionality like greet, greetWithFee, and IBC-related methods.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if there are any direct uses of the deprecated ABI variable
rg -l "RevertingBytesMarsABI" --type go

Length of output: 92


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the context around the ABI usage to understand the deprecation notice and completeness
rg "RevertingBytesMarsABI" -A 5 -B 5 --type go

Length of output: 13833


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check MetaData.ABI definition and usage
rg "MetaData.ABI" --type go -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 18218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for contract methods and events in the ABI
ast-grep --pattern 'var MetaData = &bind.MetaData{
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 61

Makefile Show resolved Hide resolved
mkdir -p ./bindings/go/$$pkg; \
abigen --abi $$abi_file --pkg $$pkg --type $$type --out ./bindings/go/$$pkg/$$type.go; \
done; \
go build ./... || exit 1; \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you need the || exit 1. If go build fails, the make target will fail too.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit2: maybe add a message saying "running check sanity on bindings" or similar?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(assuming you meant I don't need the exit 1 )

I think we actually do need this exit 1 to cause the root workflow to fail ; not sure if this is default behavior or maybe it's an os thing but the make command doesn't fail of the go build fails without the exit 1 - I tried this myself through replacing the go build ./... with go build ./. to cause it to fail due to not finding any files to build. Running the failing command without the exit command still causes the overall make command to pass.

Similar to the behavior we're seeing with abigen

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re second nit though I added messaging as you requested, thanks for the suggestion

Copy link
Contributor

@nicopernas nicopernas Dec 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I did mean "don't need" LOL

Make should propagate the errors thrown by shell commands executed by targets. Note that each line within a target is handled by a subshell. In your case you only have one command (single subshell) since you are concatenating commands like so cmd0; cmd1; cmd2; ... in which case you do have to exit

Here's a clear example

[nicolas@macbook foo]# cat Makefile
fail:
        @echo hello
        @go build ./.
        @echo bye
shell:
        @echo hello; \
        go build ./.; \
        echo bye;
exit:
        @echo hello; \
        go build ./. || exit 1; \
        echo bye;

[nicolas@macbook foo]# make fail ; echo ">> $?"
hello
package .: no Go files in /private/tmp/foo
make: *** [fail] Error 1
>> 2

[nicolas@macbook foo]# make shell ; echo ">> $?"
hello
package .: no Go files in /private/tmp/foo
bye
>> 0

[nicolas@macbook foo]# make exit ; echo ">> $?"
hello
package .: no Go files in /private/tmp/foo
make: *** [exit] Error 1
>> 2

Things like for loops need to be within a single subshell (so you need the ; \) but other things could be in separate ones. Not a big deal though - it's ok as is.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)

44-44: Fix trailing whitespace

Remove the trailing spaces at the end of the line.

-          RUN_FORK_TEST: true 
+          RUN_FORK_TEST: true
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3)

53-115: Consider extracting the setup logic to a separate method

The setUp method has become quite large with the conditional logic. Consider extracting the setup implementation to a separate private method for better readability and maintainability.

 function setUp() public override {
     if (!skipFork) {
-         ChainAddresses memory addresses = ChainAddresses(...);
-         // ... rest of the setup code ...
+         _performForkSetup();
     } else {
         console2.log("skipping fork test since RUN_FORK_TEST was not set to true");
     }
 }

+function _performForkSetup() private {
+    ChainAddresses memory addresses = ChainAddresses(
+        IDispatcher(vm.envAddress("DispatcherProxy")),
+        IUniversalChannelHandler(vm.envAddress("UCProxy")),
+        ILightClient(vm.envAddress("OptimisticLightClient")),
+        vm.envAddress("OwnerAddress")
+    );
+    // ... rest of the setup code ...
+}

61-64: Consider improving comment formatting

The multi-line comment could be formatted better for readability.

-            opLightClient = addresses.optimisticLightClient; // Need to set this so that when we call load_proof, it
-                // loads
-                // the proof to the right address
+            // Need to set this so that when we call load_proof,
+            // it loads the proof to the right address
+            opLightClient = addresses.optimisticLightClient;

70-73: Consider improving comment formatting

Similar to the previous comment, the multi-line comment could be formatted better.

-            // For now, we need to change the portPrefix to that of the one which was used to generate the proof. We
-            // also
-            // have to set that for the connectionHop to light client mapping.
+            // For now, we need to change the portPrefix to that of the one
+            // which was used to generate the proof. We also have to set
+            // that for the connectionHop to light client mapping.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22dc16c and d49d52e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)

44-44: LGTM: Environment variable addition for fork test control

The addition of RUN_FORK_TEST environment variable provides explicit control over fork test execution, which is properly utilized in the test implementation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (2)

50-50: LGTM: Well-designed fork test control flag

The skipFork implementation with vm.envOr provides a good default (skip tests) while allowing override through environment variables.


119-119: LGTM: Proper test skip implementation

The use of vm.skip is the correct way to conditionally skip tests in Foundry, maintaining clean test output.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Makefile (3)

40-44: Consider enhancing version checks with minimum version requirements

The version checks are a good addition, but they could be more robust by validating minimum required versions of each tool.

Consider updating the checks like this:

 version-check:
-	forge --version; \
-	abigen --version; \
-	go version;
+	forge --version | grep -q "forge" || (echo "forge not found" && exit 1); \
+	abigen --version | grep -q "abigen" || (echo "abigen not found" && exit 1); \
+	go version | grep -q "go version" || (echo "go not found" && exit 1);

72-72: Add more descriptive error messages for abigen failures

While the error handling is good, more descriptive error messages would help debugging.

Consider updating the error handling:

-abigen --abi $$abi_file --pkg $$pkg --type $$type --out ./bindings/go/$$pkg/$$type.go || exit 1; \
+abigen --abi $$abi_file --pkg $$pkg --type $$type --out ./bindings/go/$$pkg/$$type.go || { echo "Failed to generate bindings for $$type"; exit 1; }; \

74-74: Add descriptive message for bindings verification

Good addition of the build verification step, but it could be more informative.

Consider adding a descriptive message:

-go build ./... || exit 1; \
+echo "Verifying generated bindings..."; \
+go build ./... || { echo "Binding verification failed"; exit 1; }; \
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d49d52e and 0f8d8e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Makefile (3)

45-45: LGTM: Good addition of version check dependency

Adding version-check as a dependency ensures required tools are available before building.


70-70: ⚠️ Potential issue

Package name derivation needs improvement for contract separation

The current package name derivation doesn't fully support the PR objective of generating separate packages per contract. The simple basename transformation might not create unique package names for contracts within the same .sol file.

Consider updating the package name derivation to include the contract name:

-pkg=$$(basename $$type .sol | tr "[:upper:]" "[:lower:]"); \
+pkg=$$(echo $$type | sed -E 's/([A-Z])/_\L\1/g' | sed 's/^_//'); \

Line range hint 61-74: Verify the separation of contracts in generated bindings

The changes aim to generate separate packages per contract, but we should verify this works correctly.

✅ Verification successful

The output shows that the contracts are properly separated into different packages:

  • mars/Mars.go
  • panickingmars/PanickingMars.go
  • revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go
  • revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go
  • revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go
  • revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go

Additionally, there were no duplicate package declarations found (the last command didn't produce any output, which means each .go file has a unique package).

Let me verify the package declarations to ensure they match their directory names:


Contract bindings are properly separated into individual packages

The verification confirms that:

  • Each contract has its own directory under bindings/go/
  • Package names match their respective directory names
  • All Mars-related contracts are correctly separated into individual packages (mars, panickingmars, revertingbytesmars, etc.)
  • No duplicate package declarations were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if multiple contracts from the same .sol file are properly separated

# Check Mars.sol contracts separation
echo "Checking Mars contracts separation..."
find ./bindings/go -type f -name "*.go" | grep -i "mars" || echo "No Mars-related bindings found"

# Check for duplicate package declarations
echo "Checking for duplicate package declarations..."
find ./bindings/go -type f -name "*.go" -exec grep "^package" {} \; | sort | uniq -c | grep -v "^\s*1\s"

Length of output: 674


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if package declarations match their directory names
for file in $(find ./bindings/go -type f -name "*.go"); do
    echo "=== $file ==="
    grep "^package" "$file"
done

Length of output: 8999

@RnkSngh RnkSngh force-pushed the raunak/fix-go-bindings branch from 0f8d8e3 to ea44446 Compare December 9, 2024 22:30
@RnkSngh RnkSngh force-pushed the raunak/fix-go-bindings branch from ea44446 to 4540d19 Compare December 9, 2024 22:49
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)

44-44: Remove trailing whitespace.

There is a trailing space at the end of line 44 that should be removed.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

-          RUN_FORK_TEST: true 
+          RUN_FORK_TEST: true
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Makefile (1)

69-71: Consider enhancing package name derivation

The current package name derivation might not handle all contract naming patterns correctly. Consider using a more robust approach for converting contract names to Go package names.

-pkg=$$(basename $$type .sol | tr "[:upper:]" "[:lower:]"); \
+pkg=$$(echo $$type | sed -E 's/([A-Z])/_\L\1/g' | sed 's/^_//' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'); \

This change would better handle CamelCase contract names by converting them to proper Go package naming conventions.

bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go (1)

1-3: Consider enhancing error documentation.

While the error handling is comprehensive, consider adding documentation comments for the custom error types (ChannelNotFound, UnsupportedVersion, notIbcDispatcher) to improve maintainability.

Add documentation comments above each error type in the ABI:

// Code generated - DO NOT EDIT.
// This file is a generated binding and any manual changes will be lost.

+ // Error types:
+ // ChannelNotFound: Returned when the specified channel cannot be found
+ // UnsupportedVersion: Returned when the protocol version is not supported
+ // notIbcDispatcher: Returned when the caller is not the IBC dispatcher
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f8d8e3 and 4540d19.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (3 hunks)
  • bindings/go/iappstateverifier/IAppStateVerifier.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/ibcpacketsender/IbcPacketSender.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/protochannel/ProtoChannel.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go (1 hunks)
  • bindings/go/revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go (1 hunks)
  • test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • bindings/go/protochannel/ProtoChannel.go
  • test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol
  • bindings/go/iclientupdates/IClientUpdates.go
  • bindings/go/protocounterparty/ProtoCounterparty.go
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (3)
  • bindings/go/revertingstringmars/RevertingStringMars.go
  • bindings/go/revertingstringclosechannelmars/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars.go
  • bindings/go/ibceventsemitter/IbcEventsEmitter.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)

44-44: LGTM! Verify the environment variable usage.

The addition of RUN_FORK_TEST: true aligns with the fork deployment testing requirements.

Let's verify how this environment variable is used in the test files:

✅ Verification successful

Environment variable RUN_FORK_TEST is correctly used in fork deployment tests

The environment variable is properly utilized in test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol to:

  • Control fork test execution with appropriate default value (false)
  • Provide clear logging when tests are skipped
  • Follow environment variable naming conventions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how RUN_FORK_TEST is used in the test files

# Search for RUN_FORK_TEST usage in test files
rg -t sol "RUN_FORK_TEST" test/

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN_FORK_TEST usage in all files under test directory
rg "RUN_FORK_TEST" test/

Length of output: 270

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Makefile (3)

42-44: LGTM: Version check enhancement

Good addition of version verification for forge with proper error handling.


59-60: LGTM: Tool version verification

Good addition of version checks for go and abigen with proper error handling.


73-75: LGTM: Build verification step

Good addition of build verification step with proper error handling and informative messaging.

bindings/go/ibcpacketsender/IbcPacketSender.go (1)

4-4: LGTM: Clean package structure

The generated binding follows good Go package naming conventions and properly isolates the IbcPacketSender contract into its own package.

bindings/go/iappstateverifier/IAppStateVerifier.go (2)

4-4: LGTM: Well-structured package

The generated binding follows good Go package naming conventions and properly isolates the IAppStateVerifier contract into its own package.


Line range hint 58-75: Verify binding generation across all contracts

The changes look good, but we should verify that bindings are generated correctly for all contracts, especially those with multiple contracts in the same Solidity file.

✅ Verification successful

Bindings are correctly generated for all contracts including those with multiple definitions

The verification shows that:

  1. All Solidity contracts, including files with multiple contract definitions (e.g., Mars.sol with 8 contracts, Dispatcher.sol with 24 contract references), have corresponding Go bindings.
  2. Each contract has its own dedicated package under bindings/go/, following the one-package-per-contract structure.
  3. The binding files maintain consistent naming patterns (e.g., Mars.go for Mars contract, RevertingStringMars.go for RevertingStringMars contract).
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify binding generation for contracts with multiple definitions

# Find all Solidity files with multiple contract definitions
echo "Checking Solidity files for multiple contract definitions..."
rg -l "^contract\s+\w+\s*{" | while read -r file; do
  count=$(rg -c "^contract\s+\w+\s*{" "$file")
  if [ "$count" -gt 1 ]; then
    echo "File $file contains $count contract definitions"
    # Show the contract definitions
    rg "^contract\s+\w+\s*{" "$file"
  fi
done

# Verify corresponding Go packages exist
echo "Checking generated Go packages..."
fd -t d . bindings/go/

Length of output: 1357


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again to find contracts with multiple definitions
echo "Checking Solidity files for multiple contract definitions..."
rg -l "contract \w+" contracts/ | while read -r file; do
  count=$(rg -c "contract \w+" "$file")
  if [ "$count" -gt 1 ]; then
    echo "File $file contains $count contract definitions"
    echo "Contracts in $file:"
    rg "contract \w+" "$file"
  fi
done

# Let's also verify the binding files structure
echo -e "\nChecking Go binding files structure..."
for dir in bindings/go/*/; do
  if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
    echo -e "\nPackage: $dir"
    ls -1 "$dir"
  fi
done

Length of output: 22307

bindings/go/panickingmars/PanickingMars.go (1)

4-4: Package name change aligns with project objectives.

The package name change from mars to panickingmars effectively isolates this contract's bindings, preventing naming conflicts when multiple contracts are defined in the same Solidity file. This change directly addresses the PR's goal of separating contracts into their own modules.

bindings/go/revertingemptymars/RevertingEmptyMars.go (1)

4-4: Package organization maintains consistency.

The package renaming and structure follows the same pattern as panickingmars, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

bindings/go/revertingbytesmars/RevertingBytesMars.go (2)

4-4: Contract-specific error types properly isolated.

The package contains additional error types (OnRecvPacketRevert, OnTimeoutPacket) specific to this contract's functionality. This demonstrates the benefit of the package separation, as each contract can now maintain its own set of error types without conflicts.


Line range hint 1-1024: Verify package isolation and type uniqueness.

Let's verify that the package separation has effectively isolated contract-specific types and prevented naming conflicts.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:

Duplicate struct definitions are intentional and required for Go bindings

The duplicate struct definitions (AckPacket, Height, IbcEndpoint, IbcPacket) across different packages are actually necessary and correct. Each package needs its own type definitions as they are generated bindings for different smart contracts. This is standard practice in Go bindings for Ethereum contracts to maintain proper type isolation between different contract interfaces.

Key findings:

  • The old mars package still exists but appears to be a separate contract implementation
  • The struct definitions are properly scoped within their respective packages (revertingbytesmars, idispatcher, etc.)
  • No actual type conflicts exist since each definition is package-scoped in Go
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that contract-specific types are properly isolated in their respective packages
# and that there are no naming conflicts across packages.

# Check for any remaining references to the old 'mars' package
echo "Checking for old package references..."
rg -l "package mars" ./bindings/go/

# Look for potential struct name conflicts across packages
echo "Checking for struct name conflicts..."
for struct in "AckPacket" "Height" "IbcEndpoint" "IbcPacket"; do
  echo "Checking $struct..."
  rg "type $struct struct" ./bindings/go/
done

# Verify that contract-specific errors are properly isolated
echo "Checking error type isolation..."
rg "type.*error.*struct" ./bindings/go/

Length of output: 66809

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants