-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(instrumentation-knex): Support better-sqlite3 errors #2298
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -191,6 +191,61 @@ describe('Knex instrumentation', () => { | |||
); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('should catch better-sqlite3 errors', async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To constrain this PR I only added this change here. In a follow up PR after this merges, I want to refactor this file so that we can do a matrix test against multiple clients.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2298 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.97% 90.30% -0.67%
==========================================
Files 146 147 +1
Lines 7492 7264 -228
Branches 1502 1509 +7
==========================================
- Hits 6816 6560 -256
- Misses 676 704 +28
|
plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/instrumentation.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
8509775
to
c2eb363
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, thx 🙂
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ export const getFormatter = (runner: any) => { | |||
|
|||
export const cloneErrorWithNewMessage = (err: Exception, message: string) => { | |||
if (err && err instanceof Error) { | |||
const clonedError = new (err.constructor as Exception)(message); | |||
const clonedError = Object.assign({}, err); | |||
clonedError.message = message; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about the following change:
diff --git a/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/instrumentation.ts b/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/instrumentation.ts
index c80ebbe5..d539126f 100644
--- a/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/instrumentation.ts
+++ b/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/instrumentation.ts
@@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ export class KnexInstrumentation extends InstrumentationBase {
const formatter = utils.getFormatter(this);
const fullQuery = formatter(query.sql, query.bindings || []);
const message = err.message.replace(fullQuery + ' - ', '');
- const clonedError = utils.cloneErrorWithNewMessage(err, message);
- span.recordException(clonedError);
+ const exc = utils.otelExceptionFromKnexError(err, message);
+ span.recordException(exc);
span.setStatus({ code: api.SpanStatusCode.ERROR, message });
span.end();
throw err;
diff --git a/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/utils.ts b/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/utils.ts
index 12ba70ed..e3c82f78 100644
--- a/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/utils.ts
+++ b/plugins/node/opentelemetry-instrumentation-knex/src/utils.ts
@@ -14,17 +14,14 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import { Exception } from '@opentelemetry/api';
import {
DBSYSTEMVALUES_SQLITE,
DBSYSTEMVALUES_POSTGRESQL,
} from '@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions';
-type Exception = {
- new (message: string): Exception;
- constructor: Exception;
- errno?: number;
+type KnexError = Error & {
code?: string;
- stack?: string;
};
export const getFormatter = (runner: any) => {
@@ -43,16 +40,17 @@ export const getFormatter = (runner: any) => {
return () => '<noop formatter>';
};
-export const cloneErrorWithNewMessage = (err: Exception, message: string) => {
- if (err && err instanceof Error) {
- const clonedError = Object.assign({}, err);
- clonedError.message = message;
- clonedError.code = err.code;
- clonedError.stack = err.stack;
- clonedError.errno = err.errno;
- return clonedError;
+export function otelExceptionFromKnexError(err: KnexError, message: string): Exception {
+ if (!(err && err instanceof Error)) {
+ return err;
}
- return err;
+
+ return {
+ message,
+ code: err.code,
+ stack: err.stack,
+ name: err.name,
+ };
};
const systemMap = new Map([
This clarifies that the utility function is about returning an object to be used in span.recordException
, i.e. type Exception (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/blob/main/api/src/common/Exception.ts). Benefits:
- It doesn't bother copying the
errno
field, which wasn't being used. (If Knex errors can include an errno instead of a 'code', we migth want to consider doing something with the errno field.) It also doesn't bother copying other err fields, if any. - It also includes
err.name
, so there is a fallback value for theexception.type
attribute iferr.code
is not defined. OtherwiseSpan#recordException
can fail to record the exception: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/blob/01a2c35a694e57df45f063d61506ef9e9938eb7d/packages/opentelemetry-sdk-trace-base/src/Span.ts#L308-L329
This could all also be done in a separate change. I'm happy to PR that separately if you prefer.
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ | |||
"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": "^1.8.0", | |||
"@types/mocha": "7.0.2", | |||
"@types/node": "18.6.5", | |||
"knex": "0.95.9", | |||
"better-sqlite3": "11.0.0", | |||
"knex": "3.1.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that knex@3 does drop support for node 14. Currently the Node.js v14 unit-tests passed, however.
I am more inclined to be testing with the recent knex than locking at the old version. There may come a knex 3.x version that breaks our Node.js v14 tests.
@AbhiPrasad I think this could be merged as is, given the approvals. A polite ping on my question above: #2298 (comment) |
@AbhiPrasad Also, are you able to update? Your fork repo doesn't allow commits from me so I cannot update the base branch. |
@AbhiPrasad and @trentm any news on this PR? Anything I can help with? |
Which problem is this PR solving?
resolves #2297
Short description of the changes
Make sure
better-sqlite3
is supported by not assuming how the error constructor is set up. Adds test accordingly.