Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid redundant shutdown in TracerProvider::drop when already shut down #2197

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lalitb
Copy link
Member

@lalitb lalitb commented Oct 11, 2024

Changes

changes similar to #2195 for TracerProvider

Merge requirement checklist

  • CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed
  • Unit tests added/updated (if applicable)
  • Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial, user-facing changes
  • Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

@lalitb lalitb requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2024 19:35
@lalitb lalitb changed the title void redundant shutdown in TracerProvider::drop when already shut down Avoid redundant shutdown in TracerProvider::drop when already shut down Oct 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.36842% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.2%. Comparing base (3f5c230) to head (36012dc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
opentelemetry-sdk/src/trace/provider.rs 97.3% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #2197     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   79.0%   79.2%   +0.2%     
=======================================
  Files        122     122             
  Lines      21059   21068      +9     
=======================================
+ Hits       16651   16705     +54     
+ Misses      4408    4363     -45     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@cijothomas cijothomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets make it similar to #2195

@lalitb
Copy link
Member Author

lalitb commented Oct 14, 2024

Lets make it similar to #2195

Done.

drop(provider3);

// Verify shutdown was called exactly once
assert!(assert_handle.0.is_shutdown.load(Ordering::SeqCst));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this verify that shutdown was called only once? It looks like it's only verifying that shutdown was called (could have been called once or multiple times)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I think I should be using CountingShutdownProcessor which was added in #2195.

// Drop providers without explicit shutdown
drop(provider);
drop(provider2);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should verify that shutdown was not called by asserting that assert_handle.0.is_shutdown is still false.

@@ -200,6 +200,10 @@ pub enum TraceError {
#[error("Exporting timed out after {} seconds", .0.as_secs())]
ExportTimedOut(time::Duration),

/// already shutdown error
#[error("{0} already shutdown")]
AlreadyShutdown(String),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we expect to use this variant for anything other than TracerProvider?

lalitb and others added 2 commits October 15, 2024 18:33
/// users can call the [`force_flush`](TracerProvider::force_flush) method at any time to trigger
/// an immediate flush of all pending spans for **batch processors** to the exporters. Note that
/// calling [`force_flush`](TracerProvider::force_flush) is optional before shutdown, as `shutdown`
/// will automatically trigger a flush for batch processors, but not for simple processors.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/// will automatically trigger a flush for batch processors, but not for simple processors.
/// will automatically trigger a flush for batch processors, but not for simple processors.

Flush is triggered for all processors, irrespective of batch vs simple or something else. It is upto processor to decide if it is a no-op or not.

/// collecting, processing, and exporting spans. To ensure all spans are processed before shutdown,
/// users can call the [`force_flush`](TracerProvider::force_flush) method at any time to trigger
/// an immediate flush of all pending spans for **batch processors** to the exporters. Note that
/// calling [`force_flush`](TracerProvider::force_flush) is optional before shutdown, as `shutdown`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if we mentioning "optional" for force_flush is a good idea.

/// // create spans...
///
/// // Flush all spans before shutdown (optional for batch processors)
/// for result in provider.force_flush() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why we need to show force_flush in here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants