-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add units to Illuminance and Relative Humidity, fix missing units #765
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lucas Christian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Christian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Christian <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding a few open questions I have
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ public Channel getChannel(ThingUID thingUID, ZigBeeEndpoint endpoint) { | |||
return ChannelBuilder | |||
.create(createChannelUID(thingUID, endpoint, | |||
ZigBeeBindingConstants.CHANNEL_NAME_ELECTRICAL_ACTIVEPOWER), | |||
ZigBeeBindingConstants.ITEM_TYPE_NUMBER) | |||
ZigBeeBindingConstants.ITEM_TYPE_NUMBER_POWER) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm assuming when we dynamically generate channels, e.g. for a generic device without a thing XML definition, we ignore the contents of channels.xml
completely? Thus without changing the type here we were not actually getting the correct channel type?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No - the channels XML file is not ignored. The channel type definitions are still required. When you define a channel (either programatically or in the thing XML file) you have to specify the channel-type, but the channel can also override certain aspects of this. I'm pretty sure that if you try and define a channel that doesn't have a channel type defined, it will error.
.setReporting(REPORTING_PERIOD_DEFAULT_MIN, REPORTING_PERIOD_DEFAULT_MAX, 50).get(); | ||
handleReportingResponse(reportingResponse, POLLING_PERIOD_DEFAULT, REPORTING_PERIOD_DEFAULT_MAX); | ||
CommandResult reportingResponse = attribute.setReporting(reporting.getReportingTimeMin(), | ||
reporting.getReportingTimeMax(), reporting.getReportingChange()).get(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not exactly clear on the lifecycle order—would the CHANGE_DEFAULT
configured on line 115 be picked up here? As in the converter is initialized first then when we create the reporting
it reads the already defined default parameter values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No - it won't - it will use whatever the default is in the ZclReportingConfig
class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm assuming the device does not immediately get reconfigured later with the actual default either (unless the user goes in and changes/saves the channel options)?
So I probably need to refactor the pattern that was used in other converters somewhat to ensure it uses a reasonable default
This PR should include all code in #597, plus a few other places I found the units missing in dynamically defined channels.
It adds new units to the following channel types:
Number:Dimensionless
Number:Illuminance
Since the addition of units may require things to be deleted/re-created, this may be a breaking change.