Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8276: UI tests failing on Windows #594

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

thegreystone
Copy link
Member

@thegreystone thegreystone commented Oct 21, 2024

Ignoring failing tests for now.


Progress

  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JMC-8276: UI tests failing on Windows (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/594/head:pull/594
$ git checkout pull/594

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/594
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/594/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 594

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 594

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/594.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 21, 2024

👋 Welcome back hirt! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2024

@thegreystone This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8276: UI tests failing on Windows

Reviewed-by: aptmac, vpurnam

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Oct 21, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@aptmac aptmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting that those tests are failing, as the main fix was merged into JDK 19 and then backported to 17 (which is where I tested and un-ignored the tests).

At the moment my Windows setup is not having a fun time with Jemmy so I'll try to fix my local workspace and try again soon.

@@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ public void stopTimeFixedRecording() {
/**
* Verifies that recording events can be added/removed on the fly
*/
@Ignore("JDK-8286740 did not fix the issue on Windows")
Copy link
Member

@aptmac aptmac Oct 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Edit: Nevermind, I had it backwards. Disregard this comment.

JDK-8286740 was the backport, now that we're on JDK 21 the correct issue would be: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328159

Copy link
Member

@aptmac aptmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm seeing this on my Linux machine (my Windows builds are still on fire), so the ignore statements can be updated to be non-specific to Windows. Will have to take a look at what is going on another time.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@viragpurnam viragpurnam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
Branch "8276-ui-tests" has been created directly to "openjdk/jmc" and not on forked repo. After merging, this branch needs to be deleted.

@aptmac
Copy link
Member

aptmac commented Oct 24, 2024

Not sure what's going on with the checks here, but it's only showing the one jcheck for me, similar to #588.

Wonder what happened to the other CI actions.

@viragpurnam
Copy link
Collaborator

viragpurnam commented Oct 25, 2024

Not sure what's going on with the checks here, but it's only showing the one jcheck for me, similar to #588.

Wonder what happened to the other CI actions.

@aptmac: Other jcheck only runs on forked repo. As this branch is directly on main repo, other jcheck is missing.

@aptmac
Copy link
Member

aptmac commented Oct 25, 2024

Not sure what's going on with the checks here, but it's only showing the one jcheck for me, similar to #588.
Wonder what happened to the other CI actions.

@aptmac: Other jcheck only runs on forked repo. As this branch is directly on main repo, other jcheck is missing.

Interesting, thanks for the info. Would you happen to know why they didn't run on this PR then? #588

@viragpurnam
Copy link
Collaborator

I think "Martin Skarsaune" has not enabled the workflow run in his forked repo.

@aptmac
Copy link
Member

aptmac commented Oct 25, 2024

I think "Martin Skarsaune" has not enabled the workflow run in his forked repo.

That might be it, I'll have to poke around a bit more. His first handful of PRs did all the workflows, but his current actions seem to be stuck on a workflow dependency that is failing for a reason not obvious to me.

@viragpurnam
Copy link
Collaborator

Oh ok. I will see the log and try.

@thegreystone
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Going to push as commit 9e3bbaa.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label Oct 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2024

@thegreystone Pushed as commit 9e3bbaa.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants