-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8276: UI tests failing on Windows #594
Conversation
👋 Welcome back hirt! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@thegreystone This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting that those tests are failing, as the main fix was merged into JDK 19 and then backported to 17 (which is where I tested and un-ignored the tests).
At the moment my Windows setup is not having a fun time with Jemmy so I'll try to fix my local workspace and try again soon.
@@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ public void stopTimeFixedRecording() { | |||
/** | |||
* Verifies that recording events can be added/removed on the fly | |||
*/ | |||
@Ignore("JDK-8286740 did not fix the issue on Windows") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Edit: Nevermind, I had it backwards. Disregard this comment.
JDK-8286740 was the backport, now that we're on JDK 21 the correct issue would be: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328159
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm seeing this on my Linux machine (my Windows builds are still on fire), so the ignore statements can be updated to be non-specific to Windows. Will have to take a look at what is going on another time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Branch "8276-ui-tests" has been created directly to "openjdk/jmc" and not on forked repo. After merging, this branch needs to be deleted.
Not sure what's going on with the checks here, but it's only showing the one jcheck for me, similar to #588. Wonder what happened to the other CI actions. |
Interesting, thanks for the info. Would you happen to know why they didn't run on this PR then? #588 |
I think "Martin Skarsaune" has not enabled the workflow run in his forked repo. |
That might be it, I'll have to poke around a bit more. His first handful of PRs did all the workflows, but his current actions seem to be stuck on a workflow dependency that is failing for a reason not obvious to me. |
Oh ok. I will see the log and try. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 9e3bbaa. |
@thegreystone Pushed as commit 9e3bbaa. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Ignoring failing tests for now.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/594/head:pull/594
$ git checkout pull/594
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/594
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/594/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 594
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 594
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/594.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment