Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.1.0 release #94

Merged
merged 391 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

v0.1.0 release #94

merged 391 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

LDSamson
Copy link
Collaborator

@LDSamson LDSamson commented Sep 26, 2024

Changes:

  • Sort start table by review status
  • Polish documentation
  • fix small issue with review configuration (selected regions were not preserved in the review config panel after changing them)

@jthompson-arcus and @aclark02-arcus I think it is ready for release. I am verifying it internally now. If you can have a look if this version runs on your pc, that would be great!

LDSamson and others added 30 commits August 1, 2024 12:08
…lumn_names` (since column specs are now internal)
…fication

046 Improve handling of synchronization time
…tion. For shiinymanager, use only one initial role (data frame restriction).
@LDSamson LDSamson added this to the v0.1.0 milestone Sep 26, 2024
Comment on lines 138 to 144
static_overview_data |>
dplyr::filter(subject_id %in% r$filtered_subjects) |>
dplyr::arrange(subject_id) |>
dplyr::mutate(
needs_review = subject_id %in% unique(rev_data$summary()$subject_id)
)
) |>
dplyr::arrange(dplyr::desc(needs_review), subject_id)
}),
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jthompson-arcus this is the only code change in this PR; it ensures that the table on the start page is sorted by review status; all patients that were reviewed will be shown at the bottom now (see also #26 (comment))

Comment on lines 153 to 157

modvars$site_selection <- input$site_selection
modvars$region_selection <- input$region_selection

golem::cat_dev("Selected sites:", modvars$site_selection, "\n")
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, there was another small issue that I came across. Added a small change so that selected regions are preserved after changing the settings.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aclark02-arcus aclark02-arcus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM @LDSamson! I tested it out using Arcus' data and everything appears to work as expected. I'll let you merge when ready. I've decided to go ahead and incorporate the changes in this branch into our deployed app too, so please let me know if you make any other changes so I can follow up.

Comment on lines 115 to 118
# child of the global environment (this isolates the code in the document
# from the code in this app).
rmarkdown::render(tempReport, output_file = fileinput,
rmarkdown::render(tempReport, output_file = basename(fileinput),
params = params,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jthompson-arcus I suspect that this change could solve your problem of not being able to render PDF reports under Windows, closely related to this bug I reported previously: rstudio/rmarkdown#2556

@LDSamson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LDSamson commented Sep 30, 2024

@aclark02-arcus thanks for checking! I made a few more changes, almost all related to documentation:

  • I added a small feature description in each test that started with 'feature 0x'
  • I trimmed down the test report to just a traceability matrix and the report itself since it had a lot of customized text in it which was probably not applicable for other companies
  • I circumvented a bug in rmarkdown::render that I previously reported, which will probably solve the issues of rendering reports under windows that @jthompson-arcus had previously.

I will probably switch this PR to the master branch and I think I will merge it today if no problems occur

@LDSamson LDSamson changed the base branch from dev to main September 30, 2024 11:16
@LDSamson LDSamson changed the title Prepare for v0.1.0 release v0.1.0 release Sep 30, 2024
@LDSamson LDSamson merged commit f32e09d into main Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@LDSamson LDSamson deleted the ls_v0.1.0_release branch September 30, 2024 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants