Feature: Support OSG 24 in GHAs #21
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this LGTM but I'm not sure if we want to continue supporting latest and release, testing, and development tags. What do you think @matyasselmeci ?
Maybe we just leave those at OSG 23 with similar reasoning that we shouldn't have a latest tarball CVMFS symlink that crosses release series boundaries.
|
If we leave
(these options apply to We should definitely discourage the use of the series-less tags. The README needs updating badly anyway. Note that the pull command shown on the Docker Hub page doesn't include a tag (so it's implicitly |
|
Comedy option 4: point latest at 25-el10-development. Hey, you wanted latest. |
|
I vote (3) and we put up admonitions in our docs to tell people that |
| [[ $OSG_RELEASE == '23' ]] && tags+=( $registry/$docker_repo:latest ) | ||
| [[ $OSG_RELEASE == '24' ]] && tags+=( $registry/$docker_repo:latest ) | ||
| else | ||
| [[ $OSG_RELEASE == '23' ]] && tags+=( $registry/$docker_repo:$BASE_YUM_REPO ) | ||
| [[ $OSG_RELEASE == '24' ]] && tags+=( $registry/$docker_repo:$BASE_YUM_REPO ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's revert these changes since I'd like to deprecate these tags
No description provided.