Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add stemmer token filter docs #8277 #8444

Conversation

AntonEliatra
Copy link
Contributor

Description

add stemmer token filter docs

Issues Resolved

Closes #8277

Version

all

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Thank you for submitting your PR. The PR states are In progress (or Draft) -> Tech review -> Doc review -> Editorial review -> Merged.

Before you submit your PR for doc review, make sure the content is technically accurate. If you need help finding a tech reviewer, tag a maintainer.

When you're ready for doc review, tag the assignee of this PR. The doc reviewer may push edits to the PR directly or leave comments and editorial suggestions for you to address (let us know in a comment if you have a preference). The doc reviewer will arrange for an editorial review.

@vagimeli
Copy link
Contributor

vagimeli commented Oct 3, 2024

@udabhas @varun-lodaya Please provide tech review approval to move this PR forward in the documentation process. Please review this week or provide a peer who can review it. Thank you.

@vagimeli vagimeli added 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress Needs SME Waiting on input from subject matter expert analyzers backport 2.17 Backport for version 2.17 labels Oct 3, 2024
Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <[email protected]>
@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws assigned kolchfa-aws and unassigned vagimeli Nov 19, 2024
@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws added 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress backport 2.18 PR: Backport label for 2.18 and removed 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress Needs SME Waiting on input from subject matter expert labels Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@natebower natebower left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kolchfa-aws One minor addition. Thanks!

_analyzers/token-filters/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bower <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <[email protected]>
@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws merged commit 74ade40 into opensearch-project:main Dec 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.17 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/backport-2.17 2.17
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/backport-2.17
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-8444-to-2.17
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 74ade40c76367ebabcdec177393f03e4b3a766ff
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-8444-to-2.17
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/backport-2.17

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.17 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-8444-to-2.17.

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.18 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/backport-2.18 2.18
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/backport-2.18
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-8444-to-2.18
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 74ade40c76367ebabcdec177393f03e4b3a766ff
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-8444-to-2.18
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/backport-2.18

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.18 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-8444-to-2.18.

@AntonEliatra AntonEliatra deleted the adding-stemmer-token-filter-docs branch December 2, 2024 17:20
@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws added backport 2.18 PR: Backport label for 2.18 and removed backport 2.17 Backport for version 2.17 backport 2.18 PR: Backport label for 2.18 labels Dec 2, 2024
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* add stemmer token filter docs #8277

Signed-off-by: Anton Rubin <[email protected]>

* Doc review

Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <[email protected]>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Nathan Bower <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Anton Rubin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Fanit Kolchina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kolchfa-aws <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bower <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 74ade40)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress analyzers backport 2.18 PR: Backport label for 2.18
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Token filters - stemmer [DOC]
4 participants