Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New request: updating the Zim version of Chabadpedia, wiki in Hebrew #1058

Open
586222 opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 17 comments
Open

New request: updating the Zim version of Chabadpedia, wiki in Hebrew #1058

586222 opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 17 comments
Assignees
Labels
Upstream For tickets which are waiting for an upstream modification (typically scrapper or target website)

Comments

@586222
Copy link

586222 commented Jun 20, 2024

Website URL: https://chabadpedia.co.il/
License: ** GNU Free Documentation License 1.2**
Desired ZIM Title: חב"דפדיה
Desired ZIM Description: אנצקלופדיה חב"דית המקיפה את כלל מושגי ואישי חסידות חב"ד
Desired ZIM Icon:
https://chabadpedia.co.il/index.php/%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A5:%D7%9C%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%9A_%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99_%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%98%22%D7%90.png#mw-jump-to-license
Language (ISO 639-3): Hebrew
Is this a MediaWiki?: yes

@Popolechien
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @586222 - I remember we had the discussion in #810 : does your reopening the issue mean that the website mediawiki has been updated?

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Jun 20, 2024

Yes! Today.

@Popolechien
Copy link
Collaborator

https://farm.openzim.org/pipeline/1af3fb16-071e-4f1b-a235-fdbd304aac93 Failed with Unknown arguments: המקיפה, את, כלל, מושגי, ואישי, חסידות, חבד. Not sure that one is on us. @kelson42 thoughts?

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Jun 20, 2024

Couldn't create a zim? why?

@benoit74
Copy link
Contributor

@Popolechien problem was the double quotes in the ZIM description ; I cannot say for sure what the problem is, but using a dummy description without any quote in it made it start properly: https://farm.openzim.org/pipeline/cc068620-df43-4ee1-8337-7b33ee311fc1/debug

Unfortunately it stopped quickly right after. No idea what the problem is.

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Jun 21, 2024

OK, you can to close my request.
Thank you.

@Popolechien
Copy link
Collaborator

The task failed because of an error download article פישל_וינגרטן.
This reminds me somewhat of an issue raised by @Jaifroid that we should be able to create a negative list of entries so as to be able to push through a request (not sure it is the same thing here though): wp1/issues/737

@benoit74 Do you reckon we should consider this an MWoffliner issue (at least for the time being) and keep the recipe on hold until a new fix comes out?

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Jun 21, 2024

As far as I'm concerned, the request can be closed.

@benoit74
Copy link
Contributor

This indeed looks like an MWoffliner issue. You can already ignore some pages with the "Article List to ignore" parameter. Do you wanna give it a try?

According to our policy, I think we should keep the issue open especially since you mentioned that the ZIM has been requested by multiple users. So achieving to create a ZIM seems valuable to the community.

@benoit74
Copy link
Contributor

I confirm the bug of the description is indeed a zimfarm bug: openzim/zimfarm#668

@RavanJAltaie
Copy link
Contributor

Noted

@RavanJAltaie RavanJAltaie added the Upstream For tickets which are waiting for an upstream modification (typically scrapper or target website) label Jun 23, 2024
@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Dec 4, 2024

What's going on? Can I try again?

@Popolechien
Copy link
Collaborator

@586222 The zimfarm bug hasn't been fixed, has it?

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Dec 5, 2024

That's what I want to ask you..

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Dec 5, 2024

Because I don't know

@Popolechien
Copy link
Collaborator

@586222 Ok if you look at openzim/zimfarm#668 mentioned above you will see that the issue is still marked as open, meaning it has not been resolved yet.

On the plus side it is also prio 1, meaning priority, so it has been flagged for resolution. Then it's all a matter of time.. and resources. Be patient.

@586222
Copy link
Author

586222 commented Dec 7, 2024

thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Upstream For tickets which are waiting for an upstream modification (typically scrapper or target website)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants