Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Decide the policy whether or not to run with pruning option in CIs #77

Open
nzw0301 opened this issue Jan 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Decide the policy whether or not to run with pruning option in CIs #77

nzw0301 opened this issue Jan 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
no-stale Exempt from stale bot

Comments

@nzw0301
Copy link
Member

nzw0301 commented Jan 4, 2022

Motivation

Several Optuna example scripts have pruning option --pruning, more concretely,

python pytorch_lightning_simple.py --pruning

as in this example.

But currently CIs have not performed with such pruning option.

Description

I'm wondering if we could decide the policy whether or not to use the pruning option in CIs:

  1. Without pruning only (as in the current example's CIs)
  2. With pruning only
  3. Both

Alternatives (optional)

Additional context (optional)
@toshihikoyanase toshihikoyanase mentioned this issue Jun 1, 2022
Open
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has not seen any recent activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Exempt from stale bot labeling. label Jun 12, 2022
@nzw0301 nzw0301 added no-stale Exempt from stale bot and removed stale Exempt from stale bot labeling. labels Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
no-stale Exempt from stale bot
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nzw0301