Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update development status to stable #59

Conversation

toshihikoyanase
Copy link
Member

Motivation

We'd like to change the development status from alpha to stable.
The classifier name can be found at https://pypi.org/classifiers/.

Description of the changes

  • Changed the development status in the classifiers.

Copy link
Member

@y0z y0z left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.08%. Comparing base (e55a73d) to head (c56135f).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #59      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.95%   82.08%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         133      134       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          109      110       +1     
  Misses         24       24              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@y0z y0z merged commit 4de332e into optuna:main Aug 27, 2024
13 checks passed
@y0z y0z added the other Issue/PR that does not fit into any other label. label Aug 28, 2024
@y0z y0z added this to the v0.1.0 milestone Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
other Issue/PR that does not fit into any other label.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants