Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot #19675

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

hjluo
Copy link
Contributor

@hjluo hjluo commented Jul 8, 2024

Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot

@hjluo hjluo force-pushed the lvm-encrypt-separate-boot branch from 0ff325b to 28bb5a1 Compare July 8, 2024 01:46
@jknphy jknphy added the qe-yam label Jul 9, 2024
@hjluo hjluo requested a review from jknphy July 9, 2024 04:18
@hjluo hjluo force-pushed the lvm-encrypt-separate-boot branch from 28bb5a1 to f9dba53 Compare July 10, 2024 02:14
@hjluo hjluo changed the title Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot WIP: Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Jul 10, 2024
@hjluo hjluo force-pushed the lvm-encrypt-separate-boot branch 3 times, most recently from 87827e9 to d4eb7fc Compare July 10, 2024 03:33
@hjluo hjluo changed the title WIP: Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Jul 10, 2024
@hjluo hjluo changed the title Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot WIP: Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Jul 10, 2024
@hjluo hjluo changed the title WIP: Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Reduce yaml files for lvm-encrypt-separate-boot Jul 10, 2024
@hjluo hjluo requested a review from lemon-suse July 10, 2024 08:04
@hjluo hjluo force-pushed the lvm-encrypt-separate-boot branch from d4eb7fc to 56e1bdb Compare July 15, 2024 01:29
@jknphy jknphy merged commit b56ed45 into os-autoinst:master Jul 15, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants