-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wait until guest get IP in setup_dns #20261
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say that if guest gets ip address from internal dns service, it will not take so long to get a ip address. According to my observation, such guest can be fully up and running within 60 seconds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 tests always failed since sle15sp7:
https://10.145.10.207/tests/15612775#next_previous
https://10.145.10.207/tests/15612782#next_previous
They spent more time in getting an IP with unknown reasons.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How long do they need ? Is it this specific to SRIOV scenario (SRIOV attached network interface) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reproduced before the long holiday, it took nearly 3 minutes if I recalled correctly... I am not quite certain about the exact time since it has been too long since then.
No, this module is ahead of SRIOV tests. It runs after downloading and restoring a guest disk.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this issue happens frequently, is really significant and does not happen to other machines, I think you can do comparison with/out SRIOV settings ??? Or it only happens to certain machines regardless of SRIOV ???
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I gave my opinions clearly, but I do not mind doing it again.
I think it worth having a look because test run on a network SR-IOV enabled host. You can still have a deeper look with this pull request in place when there is resource.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
setup_dns has been always running on SR-IOV enabled host for a long time ... If you think there is a bug or problem on sle15sp7 in setup_dns, it will be good that you can open a bug. but for sriov passthrough tests to guest, I did not find a bug so far.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I think it worth having a look because test run on a network SR-IOV enabled host. You can still have a deeper look with this pull request in place when there is resource. I am happy if you confirm there is no issue at the moment or in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I will only take care of sriov test failure. About setup_dns problems, such as why the guest gets its IP longer than sle15sp6, it is beyond my knowledge and out of my fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. You can intervene test run manually and try boot vm manually on your SR-IOV enabled host to have a deeper look at this issue in the future.