Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: implement simple sugar test #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

schuellerf
Copy link
Contributor

I implemented some test, just to understand the project a little bit.

the expected_error probably will (should) improve? - but that can be done iteratively I guess

... and is this on purpose that resolve() changes the given variable in place?

@supakeen
Copy link
Member

Currently it does everything in-place though we will likely switch to copying the tree. If you use the return value of resolve in your test case it'll keep working after the change!

@supakeen supakeen added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 19, 2024
@supakeen supakeen removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Apr 19, 2024
@supakeen supakeen merged commit b2626a0 into osbuild:main Apr 19, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants