chore: add required labels check for backporting #543
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the workflow configuration in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2).github/workflows/required-labels.yml (2)Line range hint The workflow configuration follows best practices:
There appears to be a version mismatch in the configuration:
Should this workflow be triggering on the Let's verify the branch naming pattern in the repository: Also applies to: 29-29 ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more context about the PR and repository to better understand the version alignment. Let me check the actual content of the required-labels workflow file to understand the complete context. Branch and label configuration is correct The current configuration is intentional and correct:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check existing version branch patterns
# Expected: Show branch naming convention and confirm if v26.x or v27.x is more appropriate
# List all version-related branches
git branch -r | grep -E 'v[0-9]+\.x$'
Length of output: 84 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check PR title and description for context
gh pr view --json title,body
# Check other workflow files for similar patterns
fd workflow .github/workflows --exec cat {} \; | grep -E "v2[0-9]\.x|backport/v2[0-9]\.x"
# Check recent commits for version-related changes
git log --grep="v2[67]" --pretty=format:"%h %s" -n 5
Length of output: 288 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the complete workflow file
cat .github/workflows/required-labels.yml
# Check if there are any related configuration files
fd -e yml -e yaml | grep -i label
Length of output: 904 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 1a4311b)
(cherry picked from commit 1a4311b) Co-authored-by: Deividas Petraitis <[email protected]>
Add required labels for for v27 backporting
Summary by CodeRabbit