Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Provide recommendation to counter xz utils style attack (#560)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Provide recommendation to counter xz utils style attack

The malicious attack on the xz utils slipped through many
defenses because the "source" package included pre-generated
malicious code. This meant that review of the source code
(e.g., as seen by git) couldn't find the problem.

This proposes a best practices to counter it. The text is longer
than I'd like, but it's hard to make it short, and this was a
worrying attack so I think it's reasonable to say this.

We'll probably need to renumber this proposal if we also add
the proposed text to counter attacks like polyfill.io:
#559
... but I think that's okay!

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Fix grammar nit in xz utils response

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Clarify text

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Fix emphasis for markdownlint

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Update docs/Concise-Guide-for-Developing-More-Secure-Software.md

Co-authored-by: j-k <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Clarify source package should only include VCS materials

The source package should be a copy or subset of the VCS materials.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

* Update docs/Concise-Guide-for-Developing-More-Secure-Software.md

Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: j-k <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
3 people authored Dec 3, 2024
1 parent 437708f commit a7f2313
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion docs/Concise-Guide-for-Developing-More-Secure-Software.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ Here is a concise guide for all software developers for secure software developm
24. **Continuously improve**. Improve scores, look for tips, & apply as appropriate.
25. **Manage succession**. Have clear governance & work to add active, trustworthy maintainer(s).
26. **Prefer memory-safe languages**. Many vulnerabilities involve memory safety. Where practical, use memory-safe programming languages (most are) and keep memory safety enabled. Otherwise, use mechanisms like extra tools and peer review to reduce risk.
27. **Ensure production websites only load assets from your own domains**. _Linking_ to other domains is fine, but where practical, don't directly load assets such as JavaScript, CSS, and media (including images) from domains you do not control. If you do, your site might be subverted if that other domain is subverted, so investigate the risks before doing so. See the [subverted polyfill.io revelation in 2024](https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/06/28/polyfill-io-supply-chain-attack).
27. **If a source code (unbuilt) package is released, it should only include content from the version control system (VCS), and source package users should rebuild, if needed, to create production (built) package(s)**. E.g., if autotools is used, if a source package is released it should _not_ include a generated `configure` file, while recipients should ignore pre-generated files like `configure` and instead rebuild from source (e.g., with `autoreconf`). This eliminates a malware-hiding mechanism, as illustrated by an attack on [xz utils](https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-3094).
28. **Ensure production websites only load assets from your own domains**. _Linking_ to other domains is fine, but where practical, don't directly load assets such as JavaScript, CSS, and media (including images) from domains you do not control. If you do, your site might be subverted if that other domain is subverted, so investigate the risks before doing so. See the [subverted polyfill.io revelation in 2024](https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/06/28/polyfill-io-supply-chain-attack).

We welcome suggestions and updates! Please open an [issue](https://github.com/ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers/issues/) or post a [pull request](https://github.com/ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers/pulls).

0 comments on commit a7f2313

Please sign in to comment.