Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): jsonnet-bundler Lock file maintenance #5415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 23, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-3 * * 1" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) December 23, 2024 03:09
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 03:09
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 1df2a0e into main Dec 23, 2024
34 checks passed
Copy link

Meticulous was unable to execute a test run for this PR because the most recent commit is associated with multiple PRs. To execute a test run, please try pushing up a new commit that is only associated with this PR.

Last updated for commit ef8e97b. This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/jsonnet-bundler-lock-file-maintenance branch December 23, 2024 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants