Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run apiDump #1447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2024
Merged

run apiDump #1447

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

yliuuuu
Copy link
Contributor

@yliuuuu yliuuuu commented Apr 25, 2024

Relevant Issues

  • [Closes/Related To] Issue #XXX

Description

  • Running ./gradlew apiDump to fix build.

Other Information

  • Updated Unreleased Section in CHANGELOG: [YES/NO]

    • < If NO, why? >
  • Any backward-incompatible changes? [YES/NO]

    • < If YES, why? >
    • < For this purpose, we define backward-incompatible changes as changes that—when consumed—can potentially result in
      errors for users that are using our public APIs or the entities that have public visibility in our code-base. >
  • Any new external dependencies? [YES/NO]

    • < If YES, which ones and why? >
    • < In addition, please also mention any other alternatives you've considered and the reason they've been discarded >
  • Do your changes comply with the Contributing Guidelines
    and Code Style Guidelines? [YES/NO]

License Information

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@yliuuuu yliuuuu marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 22:41
@yliuuuu
Copy link
Contributor Author

yliuuuu commented Apr 25, 2024

One observation is the that API dumps captures changes in ANTLR generated files. It would be nice to filter out those.

Perhaps we want to:

  1. package ANTRL code in an package called xxx.internal.antlr
  2. filter out anything source under internal package when running apiDump

@yliuuuu yliuuuu requested a review from alancai98 April 25, 2024 22:44
Copy link

Conformance comparison report-Cross Engine

Base (legacy) eval +/-
% Passing 92.51% 90.67% -1.84%
✅ Passing 5382 5276 -106
❌ Failing 436 543 107
🔶 Ignored 0 0 0
Total Tests 5818 5819 1
Number passing in both: 5071

Number failing in both: 231

Number passing in legacy engine but fail in eval engine: 312

Number failing in legacy engine but pass in eval engine: 205
⁉️ CONFORMANCE REPORT REGRESSION DETECTED ⁉️
The complete list can be found in GitHub CI summary, either from Step Summary or in the Artifact.
205 test(s) were failing in legacy but now pass in eval. Before merging, confirm they are intended to pass.
The complete list can be found in GitHub CI summary, either from Step Summary or in the Artifact.

Conformance comparison report-Cross Commit-LEGACY

Base (abfc58d) 2a044a7 +/-
% Passing 92.51% 92.51% 0.00%
✅ Passing 5382 5382 0
❌ Failing 436 436 0
🔶 Ignored 0 0 0
Total Tests 5818 5818 0
Number passing in both: 5382

Number failing in both: 436

Number passing in Base (abfc58d) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (abfc58d) but now pass: 0

Conformance comparison report-Cross Commit-EVAL

Base (abfc58d) 2a044a7 +/-
% Passing 90.67% 90.67% 0.00%
✅ Passing 5276 5276 0
❌ Failing 543 543 0
🔶 Ignored 0 0 0
Total Tests 5819 5819 0
Number passing in both: 5276

Number failing in both: 543

Number passing in Base (abfc58d) but now fail: 1

Number failing in Base (abfc58d) but now pass: 1
⁉️ CONFORMANCE REPORT REGRESSION DETECTED ⁉️. The following test(s) were previously passing but now fail:

Click here to see
  • Example 6 — Value Coercion, compileOption: LEGACY
The following test(s) were previously failing but now pass. Before merging, confirm they are intended to pass:
Click here to see
  • Example 6 — Value Coercion, compileOption: LEGACY

@alancai98
Copy link
Member

One observation is the that API dumps captures changes in ANTLR generated files. It would be nice to filter out those.

Perhaps we want to:

  1. package ANTRL code in an package called xxx.internal.antlr
  2. filter out anything source under internal package when running apiDump

Agree that it'll be good to do both of those.

  1. is tracked in Internalize ANTLR-generated parser sources #1446.
  2. we should do as part of the package audit process before v1. For reference, the compatibility checker gradle plugin is pretty easy to configure to ignore certain class paths -- https://github.com/Kotlin/binary-compatibility-validator#optional-parameters. Let's tackle the filtering/excluding in subsequent PRs.

@alancai98 alancai98 merged commit 607c4c0 into v1 Apr 25, 2024
14 checks passed
@alancai98 alancai98 deleted the v1-build-fix branch April 25, 2024 22:51
yliuuuu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
yliuuuu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
* Revert "V1 ddl extended keyword (#1455)"

This reverts commit 2879f3a

* Revert "struct subfield and list element type (#1449)"

This reverts commit 23f6fee

* Revert "run apiDump (#1447)"

This reverts commit 607c4c0

* Revert "Support parsing for attribute and tuple level constraint (#1442)"

This reverts commit abfc58d

* fix post-revert build

* submodule
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants