Fix typos, grammar and spacing

[galoget]

Fixed some typos, grammar on some sentences and standardized spacing in comments.

[github-actions]

The provided patches do not seem to contain any security issues, vulnerabilities, backdoors, potentially malicious or suspicious code, leaks of sensitive information, code bugs, or optimization issues.

However, there are a few minor code smells that could be improved for better readability and maintainability:

1. linPEAS/builder/linpeas_builder.py:

   • Line 6, 9, 20, 30: Comments should be separated by a space from the code for better readability.

2. linPEAS/builder/linpeas_parts/2_container.sh:

   • Line 16, 257, 279: Comments should be separated by a space from the code for better readability.

3. linPEAS/builder/linpeas_parts/3_cloud.sh:

   • Line 150, 236, 270, 334, 346, 371, 398, 436: Comments should be separated by a space from the code for better readability.
   • Line 436: There's a typo in the comment, "metdata" should be "metadata".

These are not critical issues but following best practices for code comments can improve the readability and maintainability of your code.

[github-actions]

The provided PR patches are mostly related to comment changes and minor code adjustments. Here are the details:

1. Security issues: No security issues were found in the provided patches.

2. Vulnerabilities: No vulnerabilities were found in the provided patches.

3. Backdoors: No backdoors were found in the provided patches.

4. Potentially malicious or suspicious code: No potentially malicious or suspicious code was found in the provided patches.

5. Leaks of sensitive information: No leaks of sensitive information were found in the provided patches.

6. Code bugs: No code bugs were found in the provided patches.

7. Optimization issues: No optimization issues were found in the provided patches.

8. Code smells:

   • File: linPEAS/builder/linpeas_parts/7_software_information.sh
   • Lines: 144, 239, 352, 533, 546
   • Issue: The comments in these lines are not clear and concise. They should be rewritten for better understanding and maintainability.

Overall, the code seems to be well-written with no major issues detected in the provided patches. However, the comments could be improved for better readability and understanding.